||2017-04-19
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80429
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Yes sorry, fixed on trunk. Backports pending.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71617
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
This does not seem to warn with trunk anymore.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80491
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> Segher, any idea what can be done about the second (combiner) issue?
> Is it possible to special case MODE_CC class hard registers that are just
> clobbered
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80546
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc*-*-*
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80505
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|ppc64le-linux-gnu |powerpc*-*-*
Host|ppc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71509
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Doing an 8 byte load of something that was stored as 4 byte immediately
before will cause flushes and stalls... Yeah it could use a 4-byte load
here afaics.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80747
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Hi Zhangwen,
That patch looks correct. The explanation maybe not: the problem happens
if the earliest "end" is the entry block itself, not a real BB (that is,
if we start the function with a newly inse
||2017-05-16
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Confirmed. The problem happens during ccp1 already:
===
Substituting values and folding statements
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I have a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80692
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed May 17 21:57:23 2017
New Revision: 248174
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248174&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix comparison of decimal float zeroes (PR80692)
Decimal float nega
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80692
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80860
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
It is memory corruption. PR80843 may be the same.
It is caused by my r248256, sws for FP.
I have a patch. What a silly bug.
||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80860
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed May 24 14:33:11 2017
New Revision: 248421
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248421&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Fix for separate shrink-wrapping for fp (PR80860, PR80843)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80843
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed May 24 14:33:11 2017
New Revision: 248421
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248421&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Fix for separate shrink-wrapping for fp (PR80860, PR80843)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80860
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80843
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Since r247848 there are 633 FAILs in go and 131 FAILs in libgo, on
powerpc-linux. What happens is the test for atomic.Xadd64 fails, in
runtime1.go, and then it throws an
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I have a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80618
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed May 31 20:58:59 2017
New Revision: 248763
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248763&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Don't write "nor" as (not (ior () ())) (PR80618)
The canoni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80618
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed May 31 21:09:41 2017
New Revision: 248764
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248764&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix changelog of previous commit, the correct version is:
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80618
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Known to fail|
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 41465
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41465&action=edit
testcase (-O0 -fstack-limit-register=r14)
Eric Botcazou reports a b
||2017-06-03
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80693
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #0)
> Also, the costs dump in the first replacement looks wrong:
> original costs 0 + 4 + 4 = 0
This is correct: 0 means undefined. You usually get it from a
para
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80966
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Fri Jun 9 03:46:08 2017
New Revision: 249046
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249046&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Don't add an immediate to r0 (PR80966)
If there is a large
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80966
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Fixed on trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81126
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80902
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Fri Jun 23 17:37:27 2017
New Revision: 249603
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249603&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix expand_builtin_atomic_fetch_op for pre-op (PR80902)
__atomic_ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70173
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70098
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68690
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
This now compiles to
main:
.LCF1:
0: addis 2,12,.TOC.-.LCF1@ha
addi 2,2,.TOC.-.LCF1@l
.localentry main,.-main
addis 9,2,.LC0@toc@ha # gpr load fusion, type lon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67856
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67483
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Cannot work in the general case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61729
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 17:11:01 2017
New Revision: 249700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenkoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77850
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 17:11:01 2017
New Revision: 249700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenkoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80618
--- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 17:11:01 2017
New Revision: 249700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73650
--- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 17:11:01 2017
New Revision: 249700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80382
--- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 17:11:01 2017
New Revision: 249700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80692
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 17:11:01 2017
New Revision: 249700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenkoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80966
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 17:11:01 2017
New Revision: 249700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenkoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80902
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 17:11:01 2017
New Revision: 249700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenkoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80429
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 17:11:01 2017
New Revision: 249700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenkoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
--- Comment #28 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 17:11:01 2017
New Revision: 249700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80692
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 18:24:51 2017
New Revision: 249707
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249707&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenkoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73650
--- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 18:24:51 2017
New Revision: 249707
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249707&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61729
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 18:24:51 2017
New Revision: 249707
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249707&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenkoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77850
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 18:24:51 2017
New Revision: 249707
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249707&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenkoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80966
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 18:24:51 2017
New Revision: 249707
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249707&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenkoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80618
--- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 18:24:51 2017
New Revision: 249707
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249707&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80382
--- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 18:24:51 2017
New Revision: 249707
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249707&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80902
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 18:24:51 2017
New Revision: 249707
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249707&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenkoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80382
--- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 21:45:45 2017
New Revision: 249711
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249711&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Those two changes aren't actually applicable to 5. Sorry for the n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80966
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 21:45:45 2017
New Revision: 249711
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249711&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Those two changes aren't actually applicable to 5. Sorry for the no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80966
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80902
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80692
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80618
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80479
--- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to jreiser from comment #14)
> Here's how to retain the increased speed (and save around 300 bytes per
> call) while enabling valgrind happiness.
It won't be as fast. How much slower, only p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80429
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80382
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81286
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81286
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |6.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81291
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81291
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
To answer your last question (from comment 1) first: at expand
time we have:
d.3_10 = d;
_11 = (long long unsigned int) d.3_10;
c.4_12 = c;
e.5_14 = e;
_15 = (long long unsigned int) e.5_14;
Assignee: ian at airs dot com
Reporter: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: cmang at google dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Since quite a while GCC fails building libgo:
In file included from /home/segher/src/gcc/libgo/sysinfo.c:109:0:
/usr/include/linux/ptrace.h:58:8: error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81288
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
||2017-07-11
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Hi Randy,
It is development stage 1, which means we are all pretty busy, so
that's why no on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41718|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317
--- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool ---
The original testcase still ICEs ("smaller reproducer" I never got to fail).
(trunk, no options whatsoever):
81317-1.c: In function 'jsimd_ycc_rgb_convert_altivec':
81317-1.c:184:6: internal compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317
--- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Created attachment 41722
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41722&action=edit
second patch, for the original problem
This one should solve the original problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41722|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81423
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
There are a few issues here.
1) I cannot reproduce it: a trunk x86_64-linux compiler stores to
memory in that insn 20 (the testcase from comment 3).
2) 17, 18 -> 19 should already match. Instead we ge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78400
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78438
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Nov 23 14:33:13 2016
New Revision: 242757
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242757&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
combine: Convert subreg-of-lshiftrt to zero_extract properly (PR7839
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78477
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Nov 23 14:33:13 2016
New Revision: 242757
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242757&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
combine: Convert subreg-of-lshiftrt to zero_extract properly (PR7839
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77881
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Nov 23 14:33:13 2016
New Revision: 242757
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242757&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
combine: Convert subreg-of-lshiftrt to zero_extract properly (PR7839
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78390
--- Comment #28 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Nov 23 14:33:13 2016
New Revision: 242757
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242757&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
combine: Convert subreg-of-lshiftrt to zero_extract properly (PR783
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78482
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78342
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Nov 29 02:02:45 2016
New Revision: 242947
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242947&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
combine: Make code after a new trap unreachable (PR78342)
Combine c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77687
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Nov 29 05:29:47 2016
New Revision: 242949
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242949&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Make deallocation of a large frame work (PR77687)
If we use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78342
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Please file a separate bug. PR77346 is unrelated, let's not mix matters.
Thanks!
||2016-11-29
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78590
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Nov 30 08:24:59 2016
New Revision: 242999
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242999&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
combine: Don't mess with subregs of floating point (PR78590)
PR7859
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78590
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78583
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Nov 30 08:41:26 2016
New Revision: 243000
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243000&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
simplify-rtx: Add missing line for previous commit (PR78583)
The co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78583
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78342
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
That one is an unrelated bug as well, nothing to do with combine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78610
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78610
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78610
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Nov 30 14:47:01 2016
New Revision: 243028
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243028&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
ira: Don't substitute into TRAP_IF insns (PR78610)
In the testcase,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78607
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Dec 1 02:04:10 2016
New Revision: 243092
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243092&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
combine: Emit a barrier after unconditional trap (PR78607)
After an
||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Fixed.
||2016-12-01
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
No, it most
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78638
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I have a patch for the rlwimi ones. The new ones are an actual regression
as well.
1501 - 1600 of 3229 matches
Mail list logo
