https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112589
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102250
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81831
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117642
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117689
--- Comment #2 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
More specifically, gcc accepts
enum e;
static enum e thing;
enum e { e1, e2, e3};
but rejects
enum e;
int foo (void)
{
static enum e thing;
return -1;
}
enum e { e1, e2, e3};
and also
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42270
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117689
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |sandra at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117689
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118118
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118982
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117689
--- Comment #3 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hmmm, the code in finish_decl() in c-decl.cc seems to be deliberately deferring
the error diagnostic for an incomplete types on certain static decls. From a
user's perspective, I think
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90468
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90468
--- Comment #5 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hmmm, I was using "control" as a noun, e.g. warnings about control and warnings
about data-flow problems, not half of a compound adjective. If that seems
incorrect, of course I can ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81649
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110983
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82265
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105548
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106618
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108134
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101440
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61727
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42270
--- Comment #7 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I've checked in patches doing most of the re-ordering, but I'm leaving this
issue open for now because I'd still like to do something to group the
attributes and built-ins sections
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118965
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60972
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118965
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38376
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28684
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114957
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78008
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58973
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I noticed this while working on PR58973.
In common.opt, we have
Werror
Common Var(warnings_are_errors)
Turn all warnings into errors.
Werror=
Common Joined
Turn the specified warning
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14708
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85562
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61744
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87909
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
Keywords: documentation
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
The "Known Causes of Trouble with GCC" manual chapter is so bit-rotten t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90465
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88382
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71094
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
Keywords: documentation
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
At optimization levels below -O1 or -Og, the pass manager completely skips most
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71094
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42683
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78876
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97585
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113203
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71268
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91917
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
501 - 547 of 547 matches
Mail list logo