[Bug bootstrap/35619] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] fixed includes not being found if building in src dir

2009-09-16 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot

[Bug bootstrap/38591] erratic comparison failures on very fast machines

2009-09-17 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-17 16:27 --- Does this also happen on trunk, or with branch-4_3 only? AFAICS 4.3.3 had sparseset.o: sparseset.c $(SYSTEM_H) sparseset.h in gcc/Makefile.in, which means it was lacking $(CONFIG_H) thus lacking dependency on auto

[Bug bootstrap/35619] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] fixed includes not being found if building in src dir

2009-09-19 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #32 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-19 08:30 --- Subject: Bug 35619 Author: rwild Date: Sat Sep 19 08:29:58 2009 New Revision: 151880 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151880 Log: Fix long-standing in-tree build include-fixed b

[Bug bootstrap/35619] [4.3/4.4 Regression] fixed includes not being found if building in src dir

2009-09-19 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #33 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-19 08:33 --- Fixed on trunk. -- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail

[Bug libstdc++/38923] symbol versioning disabled due to non-portable sed script

2009-09-19 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug libgomp/41418] Can't build libgomp without --enable-languages=fortran

2009-09-21 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-21 07:46 --- First off, do you happen to know whether this is a regression? Then, please show more of the build output of the failing build: everything starting from toplevel target 'configure-target-libgomp'. You ca

[Bug other/37210] Prohibit Default Builds in the GCC Source Tree

2009-09-21 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-21 16:44 --- With PR 35619 fixed in trunk it works fine for me to build in the source tree. Feel free to Cc: me on new bugs arising from an in-tree build. (Leaving bug open as it addresses 4.4 not trunk.) -- http

[Bug libgomp/41418] Can't build libgomp without --enable-languages=fortran

2009-09-21 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-21 20:15 --- Created an attachment (id=18629) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18629&action=view) proposed patch Please try out this patch. The problem is, libtool turns off language compiler de

[Bug bootstrap/32272] make exit because build/genmodes.exe doesn't exist

2009-09-22 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-22 18:00 --- Subject: Bug 32272 Author: rwild Date: Tue Sep 22 18:00:15 2009 New Revision: 152037 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=152037 Log: Error out if building separately but srcdir has build

[Bug bootstrap/32272] make exit because build/genmodes.exe doesn't exist

2009-09-22 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-22 18:05 --- trunk implements the warning from comment #10 now, and r151880 fixes the long-standing include-fixed bug with an in-tree build, so this can be considered as fixed on trunk I guess. -- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug libstdc++/38923] symbol versioning disabled due to non-portable sed script

2009-09-22 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-23 04:22 --- patch at <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg01599.html>. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38923

[Bug libgcj/38298] libjava link failures.

2009-09-26 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-26 09:03 --- proposed patch at <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg01850.html>. -- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug libgcj/38298] libjava link failures.

2009-09-26 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-27 06:49 --- Subject: Bug 38298 Author: rwild Date: Sun Sep 27 06:49:33 2009 New Revision: 152215 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=152215 Log: Fix library dependencies for -Wl,--as-needed. gcc/:

[Bug bootstrap/40928] build failure w/ -Wl,--as-needed - undefined references in plugin.c

2009-09-26 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-27 06:49 --- Subject: Bug 40928 Author: rwild Date: Sun Sep 27 06:49:33 2009 New Revision: 152215 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=152215 Log: Fix library dependencies for -Wl,--as-needed. gcc/:

[Bug bootstrap/40928] build failure w/ -Wl,--as-needed - undefined references in plugin.c

2009-09-26 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-27 06:53 --- Fixed -- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug libgcj/38298] libjava link failures.

2009-09-26 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-27 06:56 --- Fixed in trunk. -- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work

[Bug libstdc++/38923] symbol versioning disabled due to non-portable sed script

2009-09-29 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 00:43 --- Subject: Bug 38923 Author: rwild Date: Wed Sep 30 00:43:28 2009 New Revision: 152315 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=152315 Log: sed and head portability fixes in ld version check.

[Bug libstdc++/38923] symbol versioning disabled due to non-portable sed script

2009-09-29 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 00:44 --- Fixed on trunk. -- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work

[Bug libgomp/41418] Can't build libgomp without --enable-languages=fortran

2009-10-08 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #16 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-08 19:06 --- Created an attachment (id=18755) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18755&action=view) (hopefully) better patch Gah. Initial white space isn't stripped from the case argument, I sho

[Bug libgomp/41418] Can't build libgomp without --enable-languages=fortran

2009-10-08 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #18 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-08 19:57 --- Created an attachment (id=18756) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18756&action=view) ditto, but without the d'oh factor That's what you get when you name one pr-41418 and the oth

[Bug lto/41593] slightly confusing configure message about lto

2009-10-16 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-16 17:56 --- The duplicate lto in the language list has been fixed in r152697, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-10/msg00682.html>. However, the way to enable lto still is not to add it to --enable-languages, but

[Bug libgomp/41418] Can't build libgomp without --enable-languages=fortran

2009-10-17 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #21 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-17 07:35 --- Subject: Bug 41418 Author: rwild Date: Sat Oct 17 07:34:47 2009 New Revision: 152931 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=152931 Log: Fix libgomp without --enable-languages=fortran.

[Bug libgomp/41418] Can't build libgomp without --enable-languages=fortran

2009-10-17 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #22 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-17 07:37 --- Fixed. -- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/38867] [Regression] gcc 4.4.0 20090114 - libjava/configure sets "NONE/share/python", need "${prefix}/share/python"

2009-11-01 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-01 11:39 --- patch and additional questions at <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-11/msg00017.html> -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38867

[Bug libstdc++/38923] symbol versioning disabled due to non-portable sed script

2009-11-02 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-02 17:48 --- unassigning; fixed for 4.5 by Jakub. -- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/38867] [Regression] gcc 4.4.0 20090114 - libjava/configure sets "NONE/share/python", need "${prefix}/share/python"

2009-11-02 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-02 18:52 --- Subject: Bug 38867 Author: rwild Date: Mon Nov 2 18:52:08 2009 New Revision: 153820 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=153820 Log: Work with defaulted $prefix (NONE) in libjava.

[Bug bootstrap/38867] [Regression] gcc 4.4.0 20090114 - libjava/configure sets "NONE/share/python", need "${prefix}/share/python"

2009-11-02 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-02 18:53 --- Fixed on trunk. -- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work

[Bug bootstrap/41709] Failing bootstrap in stage 2 while building Ada + C

2009-11-02 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-03 06:32 --- Well, can you look in /c/Gcc/Build-4.5.0/intl/config.log to find out the error underlying this failure, as the error message indicates? -- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug other/42980] GCC parallel "make install" failures

2010-02-08 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-08 18:18 --- Can you make a bit more of the output of such a failed install available, say, about 50 lines around each of the two different failures? Wrt. the failure with headers, it seems GNU coreutils install does not allow

[Bug other/42980] GCC parallel "make install" failures

2010-02-21 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-21 16:13 --- Thanks for the logs. I don't understand the libiberty installation failure yet. Can you please run the following, and provide the log file and the number of runs needed, in case it provokes a failure? while

[Bug other/43132] New: installation directory defaults do not match documentation, Coding Standards

2010-02-21 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43132

[Bug web/43133] New: changes.html needs to document configure API changes due to autotools upgrade

2010-02-21 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
Priority: P3 Component: web AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org BugsThisDependsOn: 43132 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43133

[Bug other/43134] New: installation directory defaults do not match documentation, Coding Standards

2010-02-21 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43134

[Bug other/43134] installation directory defaults do not match documentation, Coding Standards

2010-02-21 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-21 16:28 --- sorry for the dupe *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 43132 *** -- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug other/43132] installation directory defaults do not match documentation, Coding Standards

2010-02-21 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-21 16:28 --- *** Bug 43134 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43132

[Bug web/43133] changes.html needs to document configure API changes due to autotools upgrade

2010-02-21 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last

[Bug other/43132] installation directory defaults do not match documentation, Coding Standards

2010-02-21 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last

[Bug other/43132] installation directory defaults do not match documentation, Coding Standards

2010-02-21 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-21 17:27 --- I think one way to start addressing this would be to transport an unexpanded docdir='${datarootdir}/doc/${PACKAGE}' through to the sub makes (it's fairly irrelevant whether datarootdir is expanded

[Bug libmudflap/33119] Missing mf-runtime.h after make -j2 install

2010-02-24 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-24 20:03 --- This particular race condition should be fixed by <http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=122415>, so it should actually be fixed in the 4.3 branch. If you can still reproduce this with 4.3.

[Bug other/43171] New: build: target modules Makefiles have broken rebuild rules (multilib issue)

2010-02-24 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
et modules Makefiles have broken rebuild rules (multilib issue) Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug other/43171] build: target modules Makefiles have broken rebuild rules (multilib issue)

2010-02-24 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1

[Bug other/42980] GCC parallel "make install" failures

2010-02-24 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-24 22:15 --- Thank you very much for the logs, and the note that install-target-libiberty alone wasn't sufficient to provoke a race, that provided the needed clue. Please try the following three patches (split up because th

[Bug other/42980] GCC parallel "make install" failures

2010-02-24 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-24 22:17 --- Created an attachment (id=19953) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19953&action=view) properly propagate (parallel) make flags in libgcc install rule -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_

[Bug other/42980] GCC parallel "make install" failures

2010-02-24 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-24 22:18 --- Created an attachment (id=19954) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19954&action=view) Fix parallel libiberty install failure This patch should fix the bulk of the failures, and is hopefully

[Bug other/42980] GCC parallel "make install" failures

2010-02-24 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-24 22:22 --- Created an attachment (id=19955) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19955&action=view) Changes proposed for automake-generated files (pending upstream fix) This patch is just a diff agains

[Bug other/43132] installation directory defaults do not match documentation, Coding Standards

2010-02-25 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-25 20:53 --- (In reply to comment #2) > I think one way to start addressing this would be to transport an unexpanded > docdir='${datarootdir}/doc/${PACKAGE}' > > through to the sub makes (it'

[Bug other/42980] GCC parallel "make install" failures

2010-02-28 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-28 09:57 --- Patches posted at <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg01236.html> -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42980

[Bug bootstrap/38388] parallel install failures in install-{libiberty,gnatlib}

2010-02-28 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-28 11:08 --- Actually, except for the libiberty failure, these failures are different, and not fixed by the patches for PR 42980. De-duplicating and reopening. Can you still reproduce the Ada-related failures? It looks like

[Bug bootstrap/43170] gcc 4.5 20100218 bootstrap compare fails on os x 10.6

2010-02-28 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-28 11:15 --- (In reply to comment #4) > Although this pr report a problem for parallel make without install it may be > a > duplicate of pr38388. That seems unlikely to me. The cited PR does not change nor concern

[Bug bootstrap/43170] gcc 4.5 20100218 bootstrap compare fails on os x 10.6

2010-02-28 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-28 11:42 --- (In reply to comment #6) > > It would however be interesting to know whether this PR is > > reproducible with parallel make only. > > Indeed, but so far it is not (see comment #3). What does your

[Bug bootstrap/43170] gcc 4.5 20100218 bootstrap compare fails on os x 10.6

2010-02-28 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-28 12:22 --- (In reply to comment #8) > On a Core2 Duo (x86_64-apple-darwin10), I see the libgomp comparison fails in > a > no reproducible way with both -j2 and -j3 (probability since the first > occurrence at r 156

[Bug bootstrap/43170] gcc 4.5 20100218 bootstrap compare fails on os x 10.6

2010-02-28 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-28 18:14 --- Thanks. You are right that the chance for a non-parallelism-related failure was low, but comparison failures can be due to the phase of the moon literally. Anyway, here's how I usually debug parallel build fai

[Bug other/42980] GCC parallel "make install" failures

2010-03-01 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-02 06:10 --- Subject: Bug 42980 Author: rwild Date: Tue Mar 2 06:09:56 2010 New Revision: 157159 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157159 Log: Small multilib rule fixups. libgcc/: PR oth

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

2010-03-11 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-11 15:46 --- Quoting install.texi: First, we @strong{highly} recommend that GCC be built into a separate directory from the sources which does @strong{not} reside within the source tree. This is how we generally build GCC

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

2010-03-11 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-11 16:06 --- Did you 'rm -rf ~/src/gcc/trunk' and create that directory anew? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43328

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

2010-03-11 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-11 18:33 --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Did you 'rm -rf ~/src/gcc/trunk' and create that directory anew? > > no, what for? svn status reports no unversioned files in trunk di

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

2010-03-12 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-12 18:09 --- Thanks. I can reproduce a spurious toplevel-build/32/zlib directory when --enable-multilib is passed explicitly to toplevel configure. Workaround is to not pass --enable-multilib, multilibs are enabled by default

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

2010-03-12 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-12 18:10 --- BTW, the actual bug is that, if --enable-multilib is passed explicitly, it will wrongly propagate to build_configargs and host_configargs and not only to target_configargs. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug bootstrap/43170] gcc 4.5 20100218 bootstrap compare fails on os x 10.6

2010-03-13 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-13 09:12 --- Thanks. Is /usr/include/pthread.h or one of the headers it includes matched by a fixincludes rule? I.e., does any of {stage{1,2,3}-,prev-,}gcc/include/fixed contain pthread.h or included headers, and if yes, what

[Bug bootstrap/43170] gcc 4.5 20100218 bootstrap compare fails on os x 10.6

2010-03-13 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-13 09:14 --- (In reply to comment #14) > a fixincludes rule? I.e., does any of {stage{1,2,3}-,prev-,}gcc/include/fixed That should be include-fixed at the end there. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43170

[Bug bootstrap/38388] parallel install failures in install-{libiberty,gnatlib}

2010-03-13 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38388

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

2010-03-16 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-16 07:56 --- Patch at <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-03/msg00509.html>. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43328

[Bug lto/43542] New: LTO segfault with object referencing __gnu_lto_v1

2010-03-26 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
y: LTO segfault with object referencing __gnu_lto_v1 Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug c++/43581] New: exception handling broken across shared libaries

2010-03-29 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
Keywords: wrong-code, EH Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43581

[Bug lto/42757] lto1 does not emit common symbols with -fuse-linker-plugin

2010-03-30 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-30 16:39 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Works when linking in comm.o main.o order. FWIW one can construct test cases where neither order works, e.g., cat >main.c <<\EOF extern int i; int j; int main(void)

[Bug other/43581] [4.5 Regression] exception handling broken across shared libaries with -fuse-linker-plugin

2010-03-30 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-30 16:58 --- Bug also happens with $ g++ -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/opt/bin/g++ COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/opt/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Configured with

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

2010-03-30 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-31 05:44 --- Subject: Bug 43328 Author: rwild Date: Wed Mar 31 05:44:30 2010 New Revision: 157851 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157851 Log: Fix toplevel configure --enable-multilib

[Bug lto/43581] exception handling broken across shared libaries with -fuse-linker-plugin

2010-03-31 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-31 18:49 --- Here's the analogous test case from Libtool for dlopen'ed modules. Also passes when -fuse-linker-plugin is removed from the link line for module.so. CXX=g++ CXXFLAGS='-O2 -flto' LDFLAGS='

[Bug lto/43576] lto: ICE with partial linking (ld -r, both bfd and gold)

2010-03-31 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-31 18:53 --- FWIW, same failure happens with s/-flto/-fwhopr/g but is probably worth another testcase once fixed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43576

[Bug lto/43609] New: LTO -fwhopr generating shared library: ICE in csi_node at cgraph.h:663

2010-03-31 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43609

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

2010-04-01 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-01 16:32 --- Subject: Bug 43328 Author: rwild Date: Thu Apr 1 16:32:38 2010 New Revision: 157916 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157916 Log: /: PR bootstrap/43615 PR bootstr

[Bug bootstrap/43615] [4.5 Regression] bootstrap fails: /usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:7:27: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file or directory

2010-04-01 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-01 16:32 --- Subject: Bug 43615 Author: rwild Date: Thu Apr 1 16:32:38 2010 New Revision: 157916 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157916 Log: /: PR bootstrap/43615 PR bootstr

[Bug bootstrap/43615] [4.5 Regression] bootstrap fails: /usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:7:27: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file or directory

2010-04-01 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-01 16:40 --- Fixed by reverting the offending patch. -- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug other/43620] New: Uploading to gnu.org will fail due to automake security issue

2010-04-01 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
issue Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43620

[Bug other/43620] Uploading to gnu.org will fail due to automake security issue

2010-04-01 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-01 17:41 --- (In reply to comment #1) > If no-dist works to pass the gnu.org check, that (unlike upgrades) should > be OK for 4.4 and 4.3 branches. Well, for branches we are not in such a hurry. I could easily release Au

[Bug lto/41584] WHOPR doesn't grok empty units

2010-04-01 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-01 18:15 --- Same happens with cat >a.c <<\EOF int i = 42; EOF or with cat >a.c <<\EOF int foo; int *i = &foo; EOF -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41584

[Bug lto/42757] lto1 does not emit common symbols with -fuse-linker-plugin

2010-04-01 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-01 18:21 --- (In reply to comment #11) This patch works for me. Thanks for looking into this! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42757

[Bug bootstrap/43615] [4.5 Regression] bootstrap fails: /usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:7:27: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file or directory

2010-04-02 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-02 07:32 --- *** Bug 43625 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/43625] Revision 157851 has broken build on pure 64bit AMD64 systems

2010-04-02 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-02 07:32 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 43615 *** -- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/43531] [4.5 Regression] host files being used during cross compilation

2010-04-02 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #19 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-02 07:49 --- Subject: Bug 43531 Author: rwild Date: Fri Apr 2 07:49:06 2010 New Revision: 157941 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157941 Log: Revert: Fix dependency of out_object_file on gt he

[Bug bootstrap/43531] [4.5 Regression] host files being used during cross compilation

2010-04-02 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #20 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-02 08:01 --- Is this fixed now? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43531

[Bug other/43620] Uploading to gnu.org will fail due to automake security issue

2010-04-02 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-02 12:40 --- (In reply to comment #3) > I think we want no-dist on the branches and an update on trunk (possibly > adding no-dist to GCC local pieces anyway). Is that an approval for <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patche

[Bug other/43620] Uploading to gnu.org will fail due to automake security issue

2010-04-02 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-02 18:18 --- Subject: Bug 43620 Author: rwild Date: Fri Apr 2 18:18:06 2010 New Revision: 157949 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157949 Log: Update to Automake 1.11.1. gcc/: PR oth

[Bug fortran/42607] add information about how to compile a module

2010-04-04 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-04 08:40 --- (In reply to comment #1) > > should -c explain how a .mod file is created? > > IMHO, the answer is a resounding 'no.' Adding such information > would simply add unneeded clutter to the m

[Bug bootstrap/43531] [4.5 Regression] host files being used during cross compilation

2010-04-06 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #23 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-07 05:38 --- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #20) > > Is this fixed now? > The hard-breakdown due is gone, but now I am observing another bug: [...] > Note the > -I../../gcc//users/rtems/src/to

[Bug bootstrap/43531] [4.5 Regression] host files being used during cross compilation

2010-04-11 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #29 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-11 14:24 --- Created an attachment (id=20361) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20361&action=view) patch to address issue described in comment #21 The main issue described in this bug is fixed, and

[Bug bootstrap/43170] gcc 4.5 20100218 bootstrap compare fails on os x 10.6

2010-04-15 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #21 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-16 05:17 --- (In reply to comment #20) > PS> This will block any direct or first attempt to build gcc by Mac owners > unless they try builds of intermediate versions of gcc. A bootstrap comparison failure can easily

[Bug bootstrap/40972] libtool fails to detect pe-x86-64 import library

2009-12-05 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-05 17:19 --- Subject: Bug 40972 Author: rwild Date: Sat Dec 5 17:18:53 2009 New Revision: 155012 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155012 Log: Sync from git Libtool and regenerate. /: P

[Bug target/38384] shared link/execute fails for cross gcc from linux to target hppa64-hp-hpux11.00

2009-12-05 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #49 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-05 17:19 --- Subject: Bug 38384 Author: rwild Date: Sat Dec 5 17:18:53 2009 New Revision: 155012 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155012 Log: Sync from git Libtool and regenerate. /: P

[Bug bootstrap/40972] libtool fails to detect pe-x86-64 import library

2009-12-05 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-05 19:47 --- Fixed. -- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/40974] cannot build gcc-4.4.1: fenv_t has not been declared

2009-12-16 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-16 21:51 --- Armand, to expand on comment #13, could you post the exact command and error message you're getting, as the original poster did? Both of you, could you cd to the directory where the failure occurs, remove the -

[Bug libstdc++/40974] cannot build gcc-4.4.1: fenv_t has not been declared

2009-12-22 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #20 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 21:04 --- Created an attachment (id=19374) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19374&action=view) patch to turn off multiple inclusion guard for fenv.h C++ wrapper Comment #18 confirms #13. It is p

[Bug other/42525] gtyp-input.list contains 'n' instead of '\n' as separator

2009-12-29 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-29 16:42 --- Created an attachment (id=19416) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19416&action=view) patch to avoid tr '\n', for Solaris /usr/bin/tr You can either try the attached patch, or have

[Bug bootstrap/42529] Stage 1 compiler cannot compile

2009-12-29 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-29 16:52 --- What happens if you enter /cygdrive/e/Home/cvsroot/gcc-obj/libgcc, create a small conftest.c with 'int main () {}' and try to compile it with this command: /cygdrive/e/Home/cvsroot/gcc-obj/./gcc/xgcc -B/

[Bug bootstrap/42566] Bootstrap fails in stage3 building the libstdc++ PCH

2010-01-04 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 13:18 --- This looks like <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-12/msg00650.html>. To confirm, please throw away your build tree once, build, then proceed as described in above mail (adjusting $target etc). Your build

[Bug libstdc++/35942] Self Reference In Dynamic Linked Library builds for building Cross-Compiler

2010-01-04 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 17:15 --- Created an attachment (id=19463) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19463&action=view) proposed patch (In reply to comment #14) > Is this still an issue? I have not tried to reproduce

[Bug bootstrap/41818] Error building cross compiler caused by changing LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable in Makefile

2010-01-06 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-06 17:33 --- Created an attachment (id=19486) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19486&action=view) patch to add TARGET_LIB_PATH only when bootstrapping Please try this patch. Thanks. -- http://gcc.

[Bug bootstrap/41818] Error building cross compiler caused by changing LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable in Makefile

2010-01-07 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-07 19:54 --- Subject: Bug 41818 Author: rwild Date: Thu Jan 7 19:53:50 2010 New Revision: 155706 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155706 Log: Fix PR bootstrap/41818. /: PR bootstr

[Bug bootstrap/41818] Error building cross compiler caused by changing LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable in Makefile

2010-01-07 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-07 19:57 --- Fixed. -- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/35942] Self Reference In Dynamic Linked Library builds for building Cross-Compiler

2010-01-07 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #16 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-07 20:54 --- Patch at <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00349.html>, it would be nice if someone could confirm that it fixes the issue. Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35942

<    1   2   3   >