[Bug fortran/104650] [PDT] ICE in gfc_resolve_finalizers, at fortran/resolve.cc:13749 since r8-3056-g5bab4c9631c478b7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104650 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||82173 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --

[Bug fortran/105380] [PDT] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.cc:6317 since r8-3056-g5bab4c9631c478b7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105380 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||82173 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --

[Bug fortran/107142] [PDT] ICE: Segmentation fault (in next_statement)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107142 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Bloc

[Bug fortran/107142] [PDT] ICE: Segmentation fault (in next_statement)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107142 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Added to PDT meta-bug

[Bug fortran/108663] Accepts invalid bug with pdtXXX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108663 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Bloc

[Bug fortran/106242] [PDT] Internal compiler error: Parameterised derived types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106242 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||82173 CC|

[Bug fortran/104649] ICE in gfc_match_formal_arglist, at fortran/decl.cc:6733 since r6-1958-g4668d6f9c00d4767

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104649 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to kargl from comment #2) > Null pointer dereference. > > > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/decl.cc b/gcc/fortran/decl.cc > index bd586e75008..8e2cd511c4d 100644 > --- a/gcc/fortran/decl.cc > +++ b/gcc/fo

[Bug fortran/106050] ICE in reject_statement, at fortran/parse.cc:2879 since r8-3056-g5bab4c9631c478b7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106050 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2) > Likely started with r8-3056-g5bab4c9631c478b7, it was rejected before the > revision anyway. With all branches up to 13-branch, I see: ../pr105594/pr106050.f90:3:1

[Bug fortran/106050] ICE in reject_statement, at fortran/parse.cc:2879 since r8-3056-g5bab4c9631c478b7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106050 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 55515 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55515&action=edit Patch that fixes this PR for me I had to add to Steve's patch to get this PR sorted out. Ideally of course, we

[Bug fortran/106050] ICE in reject_statement, at fortran/parse.cc:2879 since r8-3056-g5bab4c9631c478b7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106050 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #6) > (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #5) > > Possibly walking the symbols in reverse order to release them would fix > > this. > > > It seems to work: > > diff

[Bug fortran/99139] ICE: gfc_get_default_type(): Bad symbol '__tmp_UNKNOWN_0_rank_1'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99139 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #7) > Updating known-to-work/known to fail version. > > Paul/Steve: do you want to assign this PR to one of you? I am of two minds as to whether or not to backport the patch o

[Bug fortran/110720] [13 Regression] Internal compiler error (segmentation fault) in gfc_expression_rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110720 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #1) > Looks like a dup of pr109948, which is fixed on 14-trunk. > > @Paul: do you think your patch (commit r14-1487-g3c2eba4) is > backportable to 13-branch? I know that it i

[Bug fortran/89645] No IMPLICIT type error with: ASSOCIATE( X => function() )

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89645 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 56892 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56892&action=edit An experimental patch for two pass compilation of contained procedures with failures I am giving up on this. Fail

[Bug fortran/113363] ICE on ASSOCIATE and unlimited polymorphic function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363 --- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #0) > While discussing a patch for PR89645/99065, the following issue with > ASSOCIATE and unlimited polymorphic functions was found: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran

[Bug fortran/113363] ICE on ASSOCIATE and unlimited polymorphic function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-01-14 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/113363] ICE on ASSOCIATE and unlimited polymorphic function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #2) > > > > Both allocation with source and assignment are broken :-( > > With numerical output from foo ([1,2,3,4,5]), we get: > >1 3 5

[Bug fortran/102689] Segfault with RESHAPE of CLASS as actual argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102689 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug fortran/115700] [11/12/13/14 regression] Bogus warning for associate with assumed-length character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115700 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #2) > Created attachment 58553 [details] > Draft patch > > Very hackish patch that sets the character length of the selector at the > beginning of the associate block if the t

[Bug fortran/108889] [12/13/14/15 Regression] (Re)Allocate in assignment shows used uninitialized memory warning with -Wall if LHS is unallocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108889 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 f

[Bug fortran/108889] [12/13/14/15 Regression] (Re)Allocate in assignment shows used uninitialized memory warning with -Wall if LHS is unallocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108889 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/108889] [12/13/14/15 Regression] (Re)Allocate in assignment shows used uninitialized memory warning with -Wall if LHS is unallocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108889 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to kargls from comment #7) > (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #6) > > Created attachment 58586 [details] > > Fix for this PR > > > > This does the job but it is still a bit clunky. > > > > Hav

[Bug fortran/103368] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:15668 since r12-4464-g017665f63047ce47

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103368 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 58605 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58605&action=edit "Fix" for this PR This "fix" turns out to have restricted utility because of other changes in 14-branch and mai

[Bug fortran/103368] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:15668 since r12-4464-g017665f63047ce47

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103368 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/84006] [11/12 Regression] ICE in storage_size() with CLASS entity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84006 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/92006] storage_size() returns incorrect value on unlimited polymorphic variable (CLASS(*)) when passed a CHARACTER variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92006 Bug 92006 depends on bug 84006, which changed state. Bug 84006 Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE in storage_size() with CLASS entity https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84006 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/103312] [11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_find_component since r9-1098-g3cf89a7b992d483e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103312 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12 Regression] ICE in

[Bug fortran/84868] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_offset, at fortran/trans-array.c:208

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84868 --- Comment #15 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #6) > (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #5) > > With the following patch len_trim is accepted in a specification expression: > > Just forget that. Indeed: NAG Fo

[Bug fortran/84868] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_offset, at fortran/trans-array.c:208

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84868 --- Comment #16 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 58641 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58641&action=edit Fix for this PR The only way that I have found to fix this is to simplify the len_trim expression. In doing so,

[Bug fortran/84868] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_offset, at fortran/trans-array.c:208

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84868 --- Comment #17 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #16) > Created attachment 58641 [details] > Fix for this PR > > The only way that I have found to fix this is to simplify the len_trim > expression. In doing so, another

[Bug fortran/108889] [12/13/14/15 Regression] (Re)Allocate in assignment shows used uninitialized memory warning with -Wall if LHS is unallocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108889 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #58586|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug testsuite/115989] [15 regression] libgomp.oacc-fortran/privatized-ref-2.f90 fails after r15-2135-gc3aa339ea50f05

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115989 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/108889] [12/13/14 Regression] (Re)Allocate in assignment shows used uninitialized memory warning with -Wall if LHS is unallocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108889 --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas --- Note to self: Backport https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-cvs/2024-July/406082.html when backporting this patch.

[Bug fortran/77504] [12/13/14 Regression] "is used uninitialized" with allocatable string and array constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77504 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14 Regression] "is

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 113363, which changed state. Bug 113363 Summary: ICE on ASSOCIATE and unlimited polymorphic function https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/113363] ICE on ASSOCIATE and unlimited polymorphic function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[Bug fortran/59104] Wrong result with SIZE specification expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- > (cherry picked from commit ccaa39a268bef2a1d8880022696ff2dcaa6af941) Backporting to 13-branch fails: [pault@pc30 gcc-13]$ git gcc-backport r15-1468-gccaa39a268bef2a1d8880022696ff2dcaa6af941 Auto-mergin

[Bug fortran/59104] Wrong result with SIZE specification expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834 Bug 32834 depends on bug 59104, which changed state. Bug 59104 Summary: Wrong result with SIZE specification expression https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 87448, which changed state. Bug 87448 Summary: ICE at trans-expr:3417 in allocate statement with type signature using an associated variable https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87448 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/87448] ICE at trans-expr:3417 in allocate statement with type signature using an associated variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87448 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 fr

[Bug fortran/59104] 15 Regression - Wrong result with SIZE specification expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Wrong result with SIZE |15 Regression - Wrong |s

[Bug fortran/59104] 15 Regression - Wrong result with SIZE specification expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104 --- Comment #16 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 58717 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58717&action=edit Fix for the regression The mechanism in the original fix was OK but the use of the locus location was not. I wil

[Bug fortran/59104] Wrong result with SIZE specification expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|15 Regression - Wrong |Wrong result with SIZE |

[Bug fortran/59104] Wrong result with SIZE specification expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104 --- Comment #20 from Paul Thomas --- OK the regression is fixed - thanks for the green light, Harald. It's a pity that I have missed the 4.2 release :-( Paul

[Bug fortran/106089] false positives with -Wuninitialized for allocation on assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106089 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/77504] [12/13/14 Regression] "is used uninitialized" with allocatable string and array constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77504 Bug 77504 depends on bug 106089, which changed state. Bug 106089 Summary: false positives with -Wuninitialized for allocation on assignment https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106089 What|Removed |Adde

[Bug fortran/108889] [12/13/14 Regression] (Re)Allocate in assignment shows used uninitialized memory warning with -Wall if LHS is unallocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108889 Bug 108889 depends on bug 106089, which changed state. Bug 106089 Summary: false positives with -Wuninitialized for allocation on assignment https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106089 What|Removed |Ad

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 106089, which changed state. Bug 106089 Summary: false positives with -Wuninitialized for allocation on assignment https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106089 What|Removed |Adde

[Bug fortran/77504] [12/13/14 Regression] "is used uninitialized" with allocatable string and array constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77504 --- Comment #35 from Paul Thomas --- Closing since it is fixed on mainline and the remedy will be backported in due course by the fix for pr10889. Paul

[Bug fortran/59104] Wrong result with SIZE specification expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104 --- Comment #22 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #21) > (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #20) > > OK the regression is fixed - thanks for the green light, Harald. > > > > It's a pity that I have missed the 4.2 release :

[Bug fortran/79685] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE on valid code in gfc_match_structur_constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79685 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Assigne

[Bug fortran/50410] ICE in record_reference, pointer variable in data statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #54 f

[Bug fortran/50410] ICE in record_reference, pointer variable in data statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410 --- Comment #55 from Paul Thomas --- > I've removed the other part that tries to detect the double initialization. > I think this is the wrong place as is would not detect e.g. the following: > > program p > type t > integer :: g > end

[Bug fortran/50410] ICE in record_reference, pointer variable in data statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410 --- Comment #56 from Paul Thomas --- > I've removed the other part that tries to detect the double initialization. > I think this is the wrong place as is would not detect e.g. the following: > > program p > type t > integer :: g > end

[Bug testsuite/117335] [15 regression] New test case gfortran.dg/pr115070.f90 from r15-4702-ged8ca972f88578 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117335 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org Last re

[Bug fortran/117434] [F08] gfortran rejects actual argument corresponding to procedure pointer dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117434 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/115070] [13 Regression] ICE using IEEE_ARITHMETIC in a derived type method with class, intent(out)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115070 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[13/14 Regression] ICE |[13 Regression] ICE using

[Bug fortran/115348] [13 Regression] -fcheck=recursion issue with intent(out) derived type argument without components with default value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115348 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[13/14 Regression] |[13 Regression] |-fchec

[Bug fortran/116040] [13 regression] New test case gfortran.dg/pr113363.f90 from r13-8926-g7c81ff02a943cd ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116040 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/117430] New: gfortran allows type(C_ptr) in I/O list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117430 Bug ID: 117430 Summary: gfortran allows type(C_ptr) in I/O list Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/117430] gfortran allows type(C_ptr) in I/O list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117430 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/116040] [13 regression] New test case gfortran.dg/pr113363.f90 from r13-8926-g7c81ff02a943cd ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116040 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug fortran/116388] [13/14/15 regression] Finalizer called on uninitialized components of intent(out) argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116388 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/116388] [13/14/15 regression] Finalizer called on uninitialized components of intent(out) argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116388 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug fortran/115070] [13 Regression] ICE using IEEE_ARITHMETIC in a derived type method with class, intent(out)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115070 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/115348] [13 Regression] -fcheck=recursion issue with intent(out) derived type argument without components with default value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115348 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/115700] [12/13 regression] Bogus warning for associate with assumed-length character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115700 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug fortran/115700] [12/13 regression] Bogus warning for associate with assumed-length character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115700 --- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to GCC Commits from comment #11) > The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : > > https://gcc.gnu.org/g:159fb203231c503418e7ab9f45282957e40cb195 > > commit r15-4793-g159fb203231c503418e7a

[Bug fortran/79685] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE on valid code in gfc_match_structure_constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79685 --- Comment #17 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #16) > Created attachment 58764 [details] > Fix for this PR > > Lot's of checking needed now: (i) To understand why this fix is necessary > here; and (ii) To see what els

[Bug fortran/79685] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE on valid code in gfc_match_structure_constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79685 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14 Regression] ICE

[Bug fortran/108434] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in class_allocatable, at fortran/expr.cc:5000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108434 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10

[Bug fortran/108434] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in class_allocatable, at fortran/expr.cc:5000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108434 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug fortran/115070] [13/14 Regression] ICE using IEEE_ARITHMETIC in a derived type method with class, intent(out)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115070 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[13/14/15 Regression] ICE |[13/14 Regression] ICE

[Bug fortran/115348] [13/14 Regression] -fcheck=recursion issue with intent(out) derived type argument without components with default value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115348 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[13/14/15 Regression] |[13/14 Regression] |-fc

[Bug fortran/116388] [13/14 regression] Finalizer called on uninitialized components of intent(out) argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116388 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[13/14/15 regression] |[13/14 regression] |Fin

[Bug fortran/109345] [12/13/14 Regression] class(*) variable that is a string array is not handled correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109345 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14 Regression] |

[Bug fortran/105054] [12/13/14 Regression] Using one kind of pointer functions causes the compiler to hang since r11-3029-g2b0df0a6ac79b34f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105054 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14 Regression] Using

[Bug fortran/37336] [F03] Finish derived-type finalization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336 Bug 37336 depends on bug 112459, which changed state. Bug 112459 Summary: gfortran -w option causes derived-type finalization at creation time https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112459 What|Removed |A

[Bug fortran/112459] gfortran -w option causes derived-type finalization at creation time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112459 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/79685] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE on valid code in gfc_match_structure_constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79685 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/33056] [Meta-bug] Data - statement related bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33056 Bug 33056 depends on bug 79685, which changed state. Bug 79685 Summary: [12/13/14 Regression] ICE on valid code in gfc_match_structure_constructor https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79685 What|Removed

[Bug testsuite/117335] [15 regression] New test case gfortran.dg/pr115070.f90 from r15-4702-ged8ca972f88578 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117335 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||haochen.jiang at intel dot com Re

[Bug fortran/105054] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Using one kind of pointer functions causes the compiler to hang since r11-3029-g2b0df0a6ac79b34f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105054 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Assign

[Bug fortran/116733] [F202y] Generic processing of assumed rank objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116733 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Working through J3/24-136r1 by Malcolm Cohen Subject: DIN-4: Generic processing of assumed-rank objects Date: 2024-June-24 1. Introduction "DIN-4 suggests "Allow generic processing of assumed-rank argum

[Bug target/116078] [15 Regression] 10-12% slowdown of 436.cactusADM on AMD Zen2 since r15-2187-g838999bb23303e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116078 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > or rather the order of some operations for the arguments cause some other > missing optimizations. > > I doubt there is not much to be done from the front-end sid

[Bug fortran/116733] [F202y] Generic processing of assumed rank objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116733 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #59119|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/116733] [F202y] Generic processing of assumed rank objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116733 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Before submission of the patch, will give consideration to Malcolm Cohen's https://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/24/24-136r1.txt Paul

[Bug fortran/84868] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_offset, at fortran/trans-array.c:208

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84868 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/109345] [12/13/14/15 Regression] class(*) variable that is a string array is not handled correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109345 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Assign

[Bug fortran/117763] [15.0 regression] segmentation fault through allocatable char arrays (?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117763 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/117763] [14/15 regression] segmentation fault through allocatable char arrays (?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117763 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug fortran/117763] [14/15 regression] segmentation fault through allocatable char arrays (?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117763 --- Comment #14 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #13) > (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #12) > > Created attachment 59694 [details] > > Fix for this PR > > > > Hi Juergen and Harald, > > > > Mea culpa once aga

[Bug fortran/84674] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Derived type name change makes a program segfault, removing non_overridable helps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84674 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug fortran/78492] [OOP] Compiler segfault with non_overridable function in generic interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78492 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/29670] [meta-bug] fortran interfaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29670 Bug 29670 depends on bug 78492, which changed state. Bug 78492 Summary: [OOP] Compiler segfault with non_overridable function in generic interface https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78492 What|Removed

[Bug libgcc/85869] libgcc fails to build in canadian cross: cet.h not found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85869 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 fr

[Bug fortran/84869] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_class_len_get, at fortran/trans-expr.c:233

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84869 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/116388] [13/14 regression] Finalizer called on uninitialized components of intent(out) argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116388 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/117768] [15 regression] ICE in diagnostic_impl (?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117768 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >