[Bug fortran/102689] Segfault with RESHAPE of CLASS as actual argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102689 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 56730 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56730&action=edit Another failing testcase With the attached, we should get: [pault@pc30 pr87477]$ rm ./a.out;ifort ~/prs/pr102689

[Bug fortran/85836] [meta-bug] Fortran 2018 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85836 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug fortran/85836] [meta-bug] Fortran 2018 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85836 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 56770 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56770&action=edit Features 1.x

[Bug fortran/85836] [meta-bug] Fortran 2018 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85836 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 56771 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56771&action=edit Features 2.x

[Bug fortran/85836] [meta-bug] Fortran 2018 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85836 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 56772 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56772&action=edit Features 4.x

[Bug fortran/85836] [meta-bug] Fortran 2018 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85836 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 56773 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56773&action=edit Feature 5.12

[Bug fortran/85836] [meta-bug] Fortran 2018 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85836 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 56774 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56774&action=edit Features 6.x

[Bug fortran/89645] No IMPLICIT type error with: ASSOCIATE( X => function() )

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89645 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug fortran/112834] New: Class array function selector causes chain of syntax and other spurious errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112834 Bug ID: 112834 Summary: Class array function selector causes chain of syntax and other spurious errors Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/112834] Class array function selector causes chain of syntax and other spurious errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112834 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug fortran/112834] Class array function selector causes chain of syntax and other spurious errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112834 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||87477 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --

[Bug fortran/109684] compiling failure: complaining about a final subroutine of a type being not PURE (while it is indeed PURE)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109684 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug fortran/109684] compiling failure: complaining about a final subroutine of a type being not PURE (while it is indeed PURE)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109684 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- The trigger for this problem is not apparent to me at all. The chunk that I mentioned in comment #5 is not responsible for it. The finalization of 'grid' in 13.f90 is done by an invocation of the 'finalizatio

[Bug fortran/87270] "FINAL" subroutine is called when compiled with "gfortran -O1", but not "gfortran -O0"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87270 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/109948] [13/14 Regression] ICE(segfault) in gfc_expression_rank() from gfc_op_rank_conformable()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109948 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||87477 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --

[Bug fortran/109948] [13/14 Regression] ICE(segfault) in gfc_expression_rank() from gfc_op_rank_conformable()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109948 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- By the way, the patch regtests OK Do you want to do the honours or shall I? I think that this rates as an 'obvious' fix. Paul

[Bug fortran/109948] [13/14 Regression] ICE(segfault) in gfc_expression_rank() from gfc_op_rank_conformable()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109948 --- Comment #14 from Paul Thomas --- Hi Mikael, > Mmh, in a sense it also "double breaks" it. For example, with > associate(z=>array(1)%ar(2,3)%array(:,:,:)), I expect to get the wrong as in > ref->u.ar.as for the last two array references. >

[Bug fortran/109948] [13/14 Regression] ICE(segfault) in gfc_expression_rank() from gfc_op_rank_conformable()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109948 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug fortran/102109] Associate to construct compound object results in incorrect type inferred

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102109 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc do

[Bug fortran/102112] Cannot associate with component of associate target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102112 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-06-01 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/102190] Syntax error reported in associate construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102190 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug fortran/87127] External function not recognised from within an associate block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87127 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 87127, which changed state. Bug 87127 Summary: External function not recognised from within an associate block https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87127 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/100094] Undefined pointers have incorrect rank when using optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100094 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING Blocks|87477

[Bug fortran/102973] possible inconsistency in procptr_assignment handling when matching ASSOCIATE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102973 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas

[Bug fortran/83154] ICE: associate and coarrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83154 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 83154, which changed state. Bug 83154 Summary: ICE: associate and coarrays https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83154 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/83700] [Meta-bug] Fortran Coarray issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700 Bug 83700 depends on bug 83154, which changed state. Bug 83154 Summary: ICE: associate and coarrays https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83154 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/85510] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression][Coarray] Linking error when accessing a coindexed variable inside an associate block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85510 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10 f

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 87430, which changed state. Bug 87430 Summary: [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in fortran/trans-types.c:1157 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87430 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/87430] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in fortran/trans-types.c:1157

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87430 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Statu

[Bug fortran/87460] [F03] accepts-invalid bug with ASSOCIATE and array argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87460 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 87460, which changed state. Bug 87460 Summary: [F03] accepts-invalid bug with ASSOCIATE and array argument https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87460 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/89645] No IMPLICIT type error with: ASSOCIATE( X => function() )

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89645 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug fortran/93338] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:282

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93338 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 93338, which changed state. Bug 93338 Summary: [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:282 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93338 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/95068] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_class_from_expr, at fortran/trans-expr.c:484

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95068 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 95068, which changed state. Bug 95068 Summary: [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_class_from_expr, at fortran/trans-expr.c:484 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95068 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/99326] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_build_dummy_array_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99326 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 99326, which changed state. Bug 99326 Summary: [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_build_dummy_array_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1299 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99326 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 102109, which changed state. Bug 102109 Summary: Associate to construct compound object results in incorrect type inferred https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102109 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/102109] Associate to construct compound object results in incorrect type inferred

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102109 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/102109] Associate to construct compound object results in incorrect type inferred

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102109 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Hi Brad, This is fixed on trunk (14-branch). I am going to close the PR for housekeeping purposes but will be sure to include the patch in a cumulative backport. Thanks for the report. Paul

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 102112, which changed state. Bug 102112 Summary: Cannot associate with component of associate target https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102112 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/102112] Cannot associate with component of associate target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102112 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/102190] Syntax error reported in associate construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102190 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 102190, which changed state. Bug 102190 Summary: Syntax error reported in associate construct https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102190 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/102532] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_corank, at fortran/expr.c:5769

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102532 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 102532, which changed state. Bug 102532 Summary: [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_corank, at fortran/expr.c:5769 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102532 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/104430] [10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_component_ref, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:2742 since r9-3522-gd0477233215e37de

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104430 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 104430, which changed state. Bug 104430 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_component_ref, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:2742 since r9-3522-gd0477233215e37de https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104430

[Bug fortran/106048] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in ubsan_encode_value, at ubsan.cc:143 / verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106048 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 106048, which changed state. Bug 106048 Summary: [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in ubsan_encode_value, at ubsan.cc:143 / verify_gimple failed https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106048 What|Remov

[Bug fortran/106048] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in ubsan_encode_value, at ubsan.cc:143 / verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106048 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/109948] [13/14 Regression] ICE(segfault) in gfc_expression_rank() from gfc_op_rank_conformable()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109948 --- Comment #19 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #16) > (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #15) > > Created attachment 55225 [details] > > Fix for this PR > > > > The attached patch substantially tidies up parse_associat

[Bug fortran/109948] [13/14 Regression] ICE(segfault) in gfc_expression_rank() from gfc_op_rank_conformable()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109948 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 109948, which changed state. Bug 109948 Summary: [13/14 Regression] ICE(segfault) in gfc_expression_rank() from gfc_op_rank_conformable() https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109948 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/99350] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1869

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99350 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|87477 | CC|

[Bug fortran/99350] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1869

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99350 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/109451] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor with ASSOCIATE and substrings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109451 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 109451, which changed state. Bug 109451 Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor with ASSOCIATE and substrings https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109451 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 107821, which changed state. Bug 107821 Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.cc:3723 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107821 What|Removed |A

[Bug fortran/107821] ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.cc:3723

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107821 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/107900] Select type with intrinsic type inside associate causes ICE / Segmenation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107900 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug fortran/88688] Incorrect association in SELECT TYPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88688 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug fortran/110224] Rejects valid: function reference with data pointer result as lhs in assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110224 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||87477 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --

[Bug fortran/110033] rejects-valid: associate name corresponding to coarray selector should be considered a coarray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110033 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Bloc

[Bug fortran/110224] Rejects valid: function reference with data pointer result as lhs in assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110224 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Hi Neil, Thanks for posting this bug report. > !x%var_ptr() = 2.0 ! THIS IS NOT REJECTED AS EXPECTED Why do you think that this should be rejected? As I understood it, this was permitted by the definition

[Bug fortran/108961] Segfault when associating to pointer from C_F_POINTER

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108961 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 55368 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55368&action=edit Fix for this PR I couldn't see what the problem was initially and so I put this PR to one side. I still have it

[Bug fortran/110224] Rejects valid: function reference with data pointer result as lhs in assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110224 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Neil Carlson from comment #5) > >> !x%var_ptr() = 2.0 ! THIS IS NOT REJECTED AS EXPECTED > > > > I could have phrased the comment better. I expected that assignment to be > > okay > > (i.e., no

[Bug fortran/110224] Rejects valid: function reference with data pointer result as lhs in assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110224 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Hi Neil, > I actually didn't originally try that commented-out assignment with nagfor, > but confirm that it gets it wrong as you said. I'll give you the honor of > submitting a bug report. Will do! > > na

[Bug fortran/110224] Rejects valid: function reference with data pointer result as lhs in assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110224 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 110224, which changed state. Bug 110224 Summary: Rejects valid: function reference with data pointer result as lhs in assignment https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110224 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/107900] Select type with intrinsic type inside associate causes ICE / Segmenation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107900 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 107900, which changed state. Bug 107900 Summary: Select type with intrinsic type inside associate causes ICE / Segmenation fault https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107900 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/88688] Incorrect association in SELECT TYPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88688 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Fixed on trunk and closing. I will build a composite patch for 13-branch in a few weeks. Thanks for the report Paul

[Bug fortran/108961] Segfault when associating to pointer from C_F_POINTER

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108961 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/100650] Passing a derived-type array constructor to the reshape intrinsic gives incorrect results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100650 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-06-21 CC|

[Bug fortran/49213] [OOP] gfortran rejects structure constructor expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49213 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Assigne

[Bug fortran/99065] ASSOCIATE function selector expression "no IMPLICIT type" failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99065 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 99065, which changed state. Bug 99065 Summary: ASSOCIATE function selector expression "no IMPLICIT type" failure https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99065 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/89645] No IMPLICIT type error with: ASSOCIATE( X => function() )

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89645 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- *** Bug 99065 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/87908] [PDT] ICE in check_interface0, at fortran/interface.c:1841

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87908 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Block

[Bug fortran/95504] [PDT] ICE in transfer_array_component, at fortran/trans-io.c:2167

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95504 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||82173 CC|

[Bug fortran/95541] [PDT] ICE in gfc_get_dataptr_offset, at fortran/trans-array.c:6909

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95541 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||82173 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---

[Bug fortran/95543] [PDT] ICE in is_CFI_desc, at fortran/expr.c:1080

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95543 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Block

[Bug fortran/98023] ICE: [PDT] free_expr0(): Bad expr type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98023 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Added to PDT meta-bug

[Bug fortran/99709] [PDT] VALUE attribute for an object with nonconstant length parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99709 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Block

[Bug fortran/102003] [PDT] Length of character component not simplified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102003 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/102240] [PDT] derived type parameter does not shadow variable name in enclosing scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102240 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||82173 CC|

[Bug fortran/102241] [PDT] ICE when declaring derived type with a parameterized derived type member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102241 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Bloc

[Bug fortran/102457] [PDT] ICE in fold_convert_const_int_from_real, at fold-const.c:2034

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102457 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||82173 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --

[Bug fortran/102686] [PDT] ICE in check_host_association, at fortran/resolve.c:6055

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102686 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||82173 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --

[Bug fortran/102901] ICE (segfault) when compiling pdt_13.f03 with -fcheck=all in gfc_check_pdt_dummy -> structure_alloc_comps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102901 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Bloc

[Bug fortran/103371] [PDT] f951: internal compiler error: Aborted (free(): double free detected in tcache 2) when giving diagnostics on type of a parameter expression since r8-3056-g5bab4c9631c478b7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103371 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||82173 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --

[Bug fortran/103414] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] [PDT] ICE in gfc_free_actual_arglist, at fortran/expr.c:547 since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103414 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/103508] [PDT] ICE in gfc_find_symtree, at fortran/symbol.c:2979

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103508 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||82173 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/103748] [PDT] Variable declaration with PDT syntax when the type is not a PDT fails to trigger a syntax error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103748 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/104096] ICE with parameterized derived type (PDT)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104096 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||82173 CC|

[Bug fortran/104097] parameterized derived type (PDT) with type-bound procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104097 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Blocks|

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >