https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110224
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Hi Neil, > I actually didn't originally try that commented-out assignment with nagfor, > but confirm that it gets it wrong as you said. I'll give you the honor of > submitting a bug report. Will do! > > nagfor does get the ASSOCIATE part correct, which was what I was what I was > after in the first place when I encountered this bug. In your gfortran-bugs, I think that the following are the associate bugs: gfortran-20230529.f90 Still doesn't identify co-array associate name gfortran-20220127.f90 ICE in verify_gimple gfortran-20171124a.f90 <= compiles and runs correctly from 8-branch to trunk gfortran-20160821.f90 -ditto- (i) Have I got the lot? (ii) Are there existing PRs for the two most recent? Regards and thanks for your support Paul
