https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71156
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #5)
> With the patch in comment 3, compiling the test
>
> module my_interface
> implicit none
> interface
> module subroutine f
> end subroutine
> e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71156
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Wed Jun 1 14:30:00 2016
New Revision: 236996
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236996&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-01 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/71156
* decl.c (copy_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71156
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Wed Jun 1 18:46:11 2016
New Revision: 237004
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237004&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-01 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/71156
* decl.c (copy_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71156
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70350
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Jun 2 17:44:59 2016
New Revision: 237043
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237043&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-02 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/70350
Backport from tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70350
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70673
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jun 13 07:48:25 2016
New Revision: 237358
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237358&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-13 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/70673
* frontend-passe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44265
--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Ian Harvey from comment #10)
> The patch discussed in #5 applies changes to the wrong location in
> trans-decl.c. Corrected patch attached.
>
> With this latest patch I see no variation in che
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44265
--- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Ian Harvey from comment #10)
> The patch discussed in #5 applies changes to the wrong location in
> trans-decl.c. Corrected patch attached.
>
> With this latest patch I see no variation in che
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81447
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|FIXED |---
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
Hi Richi,
This is not right - only the first level should be nullified. Oddly, GNU
Fortran (GCC) 5.1.1 20150618 (Red Hat 5.1.1-4) did the right thing. It seems to
have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81827
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80657
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834
--- Comment #16 from Paul Thomas ---
Dear Jerry,
Thanks for your confirmation of my feeling about this. I have enough on my
plate as it is!
Cheers
Paul
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Reported on clf by Ev. Drikos
type t6
integer :: i
class(t6), allocatable :: foo
end type t6
type(t6) :: x
x = t6(42, t6
||2017-08-30
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas ---
Taking it
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82064
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to janus from comment #3)
> It appears that the regression has been introduced by r241450, which was the
> fix for PR 69834. Reverting it, in particular the changes to
> resolve_select_type, makes the
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
As reported on
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.fortran/yqT4TInGjC0 by James
Van Buskirk:
program data_var2
implicit none
integer, parameter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82161
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57019
--- Comment #14 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Sep 10 17:02:53 2017
New Revision: 251949
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251949&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-10 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/34640
PR fortran/4073
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57116
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Sep 10 17:02:53 2017
New Revision: 251949
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251949&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-10 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/34640
PR fortran/40737
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40737
--- Comment #19 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Sep 10 17:02:53 2017
New Revision: 251949
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251949&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-10 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/34640
PR fortran/4073
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763
--- Comment #25 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Sep 10 17:02:53 2017
New Revision: 251949
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251949&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-10 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/34640
PR fortran/4073
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
--- Comment #35 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Sep 10 17:02:53 2017
New Revision: 251949
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251949&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-10 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/34640
PR fortran/4073
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 34640, which changed state.
Bug 34640 Summary: ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39304
Bug 39304 depends on bug 34640, which changed state.
Bug 34640 Summary: ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56818
Bug 56818 depends on bug 34640, which changed state.
Bug 34640 Summary: ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56818
Bug 56818 depends on bug 40737, which changed state.
Bug 40737 Summary: Pointer references sometimes fail to define "span" symbols
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40737
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40737
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57019
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57116
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
Fixed on trunk.
I am sorry that it has taken so long.
Thanks for the report.
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763
--- Comment #26 from Paul Thomas ---
Fixed on trunk.
I am sorry that it has taken so long.
Thanks for the report.
Paul
dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> Confirmed. Is the code valid?
>
> module mod
> implicit none
>
> integer, parameter :: dp = kind (0.0d0)
>
> type, public :: v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82168
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Tue Sep 12 18:06:52 2017
New Revision: 252039
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252039&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-12 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/82173
PR fortran/82168
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Tue Sep 12 18:06:52 2017
New Revision: 252039
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252039&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-12 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/82173
PR fortran/82168
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Wed Sep 13 21:15:26 2017
New Revision: 252734
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252734&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-13 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/82173
* decl.c (match_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Sep 15 07:26:14 2017
New Revision: 252781
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252781&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-15 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/82184
trans-decl.c (gf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Sep 17 18:24:37 2017
New Revision: 252894
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252894&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-17 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/82173
* decl.c (gfc_ge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60483
--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Sep 17 18:24:37 2017
New Revision: 252894
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252894&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-17 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/82173
* decl.c (gfc_g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81903
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64933
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2017-09-21
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|gfortran rejects valid &|gfortran rejects valid &
|accepts invalid r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82275
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|gfortran rejects valid &|gfortran rejects valid &
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52832
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Sep 21 18:40:21 2017
New Revision: 253077
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253077&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-21 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/52832
* match.c (gfc_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67543
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Sep 21 18:40:21 2017
New Revision: 253077
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253077&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-21 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/52832
* match.c (gfc_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82121
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Sep 21 18:40:21 2017
New Revision: 253077
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253077&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-21 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/52832
* match.c (gfc_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78152
--- Comment #14 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Sep 21 18:40:21 2017
New Revision: 253077
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253077&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-21 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/52832
* match.c (gfc_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80120
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Sep 21 18:40:21 2017
New Revision: 253077
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253077&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-21 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/52832
* match.c (gfc_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81903
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Sep 21 18:40:21 2017
New Revision: 253077
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253077&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-21 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/52832
* match.c (gfc_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78512
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Sep 21 18:40:21 2017
New Revision: 253077
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253077&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-21 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/52832
* match.c (gfc_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82258
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52832
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Sep 22 08:38:31 2017
New Revision: 253091
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253091&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-22 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/52832
* gfortran.dg/as
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Posted on Stack Overflow:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46369744/gfortran-associates-wrong-type-bound
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82312
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80440
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Apr 17 18:22:03 2017
New Revision: 246952
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246952&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-04-17 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/80440
* module.c (find
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80440
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80554
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Tamas Bela Feher from comment #0)
> Created attachment 41281 [details]
> submodule redefines a variable from the ancestor module
>
> Dear GFortran team,
>
> In the attached program, module M and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80554
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80554
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Tue May 16 20:09:02 2017
New Revision: 248129
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248129&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-05-16 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/80554
* decl.c (build_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79842
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> Do you agree with the change in comment 0? If yes, I can do the testing and
> packaging.
Yes, that's fine by me.
Thanks
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80965
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80965
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 41519
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41519&action=edit
Patch for the bug
This appears to be a consequence of r241450, which fixed PR69834 (select type
clashes).
The fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
--- Comment #29 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 41534
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41534&action=edit
An unpolished patch for the bug
Dear All,
Since I am not going to have any time to fix the array descriptor ref
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52162
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78474
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38319
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas ---
class_array_15.f03 leaks from line 65-66:
allocate (indv(2), source = [individual(1, [99,999]), &
individual(2, [999,])])
==22496== HEAP SUMMARY:
==22496== in use at e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38319
--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas ---
Of the testcases originally highlighted:
alloc_comp_assign_2.f90 still leaks
alloc_comp_assign_4.f90 still leaks
alloc_comp_basics_2.f90 still leaks
alloc_comp_basics_5.f90 is OK - probabl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78293
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Nov 25 12:23:43 2016
New Revision: 242875
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242875&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-25 Andre Vehreschild
Paul Thomas
PR fortran/78
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78474
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 40168
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40168&action=edit
Fix for the PR
This patch has been posted to the list.
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77903
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Damian Rouson from comment #0)
> Gfortran accepts invalid code in which an implicitly typed interface body
> has the same name as a conflicting, explicitly typed module function
> implemented in a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78474
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Nov 27 19:00:00 2016
New Revision: 242900
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242900&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-27 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/78474
* module.c (gfc_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78331
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Nov 27 19:00:00 2016
New Revision: 242900
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242900&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-27 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/78474
* module.c (gfc_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77903
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 40237
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40237&action=edit
Fix for the PR
This is still a bit rough round the edges but it fixes the PR, regtests and
bootstraps with this t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45516
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39627
Bug 39627 depends on bug 45516, which changed state.
Bug 45516 Summary: [F08] allocatable compontents of recursive type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45516
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77903
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #40237|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77903
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #40256|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44265
--- Comment #18 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Dec 9 11:55:27 2016
New Revision: 243478
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243478&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-12-09 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/44265
* gfortran.h :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44265
--- Comment #19 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 40286
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40286&action=edit
Failing testcases with -flto under Darwin
The PR is fixed under Linux but gives a link error under Darwin with -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77903
--- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Dec 9 22:25:26 2016
New Revision: 243507
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243507&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-12-09 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/77903
* decl.c (get_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77903
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78350
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sat Dec 10 18:35:47 2016
New Revision: 243517
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243517&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-12-10 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/78350
* resolve.c (reso
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 40302
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40302&action=edit
A workaround for the PR (even a patch?)
The attached allows this testcase to run as intended:
! { dg-do run }
!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
--- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #12)
> Created attachment 40305 [details]
> Patch for the PR
>
> That attachment appears to fix the testcases of comments #6 and #9. This
> check of comment #6 runs OK:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
--- Comment #15 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Damian Rouson from comment #14)
> Hi Paul,
>
> Based on comment #12, I assume you no longer believe that type guarding is
> required. If I misinterpreted comment #12, please let me know. Otherwi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
--- Comment #16 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #15)
> (In reply to Damian Rouson from comment #14)
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > Based on comment #12, I assume you no longer believe that type guarding is
> > required. If I mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
--- Comment #21 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Damian Rouson from comment #19)
> (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #16)
> > (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #15)
> > > (In reply to Damian Rouson from comment #14)
> > > > Hi Paul,
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
--- Comment #22 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to janus from comment #20)
> (In reply to Damian Rouson from comment #19)
> > > On thinking about it, is the specific instance of write_formatted allowed?
> >
> > I believe not. Note 7.50 of the 31
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
As noted in
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.fortran/OsOpiumYCqY gfortran
has implemented a number of F2015 features but has not activated -std=f2015,
even though
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to janus from comment #1)
> +1
>
> Can you remind us which F15 features we have already?
>
> On https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran/News I see:
> * Support for IMPLICIT NONE (external, type).
> * ERRO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65045
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79382
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> The test compiles and executes if I remove the line
>
>public :: write (formatted)
Hi Walt and Dominique,
Should this be a syntax error or a quiet ign
||2017-02-07
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas ---
Dear Stefano (and Chris),
I can
||2017-02-09
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas ---
It's mine! I'll pu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79447
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
Hi Damian,
Thanks for the report. I am back in France for a couple of days, tidying up
things like utility company contracts and the pile of "stuff" that I left in a
friend's garage. I'll get onto this as soon
901 - 1000 of 2249 matches
Mail list logo
