https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846
--- Comment #19 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jul 17 17:25:55 2015
New Revision: 225953
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225953&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-17 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/52846
* decl.c (gfc_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846
--- Comment #20 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jul 17 17:26:12 2015
New Revision: 225955
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225955&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-17 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/52846
* decl.c (gfc_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846
--- Comment #21 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jul 17 17:26:42 2015
New Revision: 225956
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225956&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-17 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/52846
* decl.c (gfc_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846
--- Comment #22 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jul 17 17:27:42 2015
New Revision: 225957
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225957&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-17 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/52846
* decl.c (gfc_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846
--- Comment #23 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jul 17 17:32:09 2015
New Revision: 225958
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225958&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-17 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/52846
* decl.c (gfc_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66762
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> > What are the precise circumstances that you see this, please?
>
> [Book15] f90/bug% gfc
> /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/submodule_1.f90 -flto
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Please see
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.fortran/dN_tQA1Mu-I
for the description of the
||2015-08-01
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67091
--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sat Aug 1 18:37:25 2015
New Revision: 226464
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226464&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-08-01 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/67091
* trans-intrinsi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66079
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 36113
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36113&action=edit
Patch for th 5 branch
Before closing this PR, I checked and found that the 5 branch now leaks memory.
The attach
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846
--- Comment #25 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 5 12:06:25 2015
New Revision: 226622
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226622&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-08-05 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/52846
* module.c (che
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67174
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #5)
> >
> > Please read comment 0.
> >
>
> I read comment #0.
>
> THERE IS NO CODE THERE.
>
> THERE IS NO CODE ATTACHED TO THIS PR.
>
> One needs to go to PR65045 to g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47850
--- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas 2011-03-06 16:19:02
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Jerry,
Based in this and comment #11, I noted that the place where this was failing
was iterator-free EXPR_ARRAYs. I then leapt to the following patch, which
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47850
--- Comment #14 from Paul Thomas 2011-03-06 20:15:42
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Mar 6 20:15:38 2011
New Revision: 170720
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170720
Log:
2011-03-06 Paul Thomas
Jerry DeLisle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47850
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46896
--- Comment #16 from Paul Thomas 2011-03-13 14:16:25
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Tobias,
>
> You shame me - I undertook to do something with this one and did not.
> I do not know that the fix is compatible even with 4.5 - I think not.
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35913
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
||2011.03.13 15:09:07
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas 2011-03-13 15:09:07
UTC ---
Created attachment 23645
||2011.03.13 15:24:42
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas 2011-03-13 15:24:42
UTC ---
This can be confirmed
Paul
||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas 2011-03-13 15:34:27
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Intel (#i552365) pointed out the following, which is part of 11.2 Modules of
> the F2003 spec:
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41107
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||WONTFIX
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas 2011-03-13 15:54:19
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Just for completeness: The wording in
> J3/04-007 (p. 259, ll. 38-41; "12.3.2.1 Interface block
||2011.03.13 15:59:24
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas 2011-03-13 15:59:24
UTC ---
This could certainly do with a cleanup.
Confirmed
Paul
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47348
--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas 2011-03-13 17:37:47
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Mar 13 17:37:43 2011
New Revision: 170923
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170923
Log:
2011-03-13 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/47348
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47348
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46886
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25708
--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas 2011-04-04 11:49:52
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> I would like to promote this one. I have run into an application that is
> taking about 2 to 3 minutes to compile while other compilers can do so in a
> mat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48360
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48462
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48456
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48462
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas 2011-04-10 18:48:40
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> This should be easy. The only difference between default (failing) and
snip
> which sort of does a job on 'a'. I say that it is easy because there a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48456
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas 2011-04-12 19:14:53
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Tue Apr 12 19:14:49 2011
New Revision: 172339
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172339
Log:
2011-04-12 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/48360
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48360
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas 2011-04-12 19:14:52
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Tue Apr 12 19:14:49 2011
New Revision: 172339
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172339
Log:
2011-04-12 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/48360
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48456
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas 2011-04-13 18:38:21
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Wed Apr 13 18:38:17 2011
New Revision: 172390
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172390
Log:
2011-04-13 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/48360
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48360
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas 2011-04-13 18:38:21
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Wed Apr 13 18:38:17 2011
New Revision: 172390
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172390
Log:
2011-04-13 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/48360
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48360
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48456
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48462
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas 2011-04-15 20:40:58
UTC ---
Created attachment 24008
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24008
A fix for the PR
This fixes the PR and bootstraps/regtests on FC9/x86_64.
I will continue to look for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48462
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas 2011-04-16 21:25:55
UTC ---
Created attachment 24014
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24014
A more elegant fix
This bootstraps and regtests on FC9/x86_64.
A testcase has been developed. Will s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48588
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48462
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas 2011-04-18 05:07:44
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Apr 18 05:07:38 2011
New Revision: 172636
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172636
Log:
2011-04-18 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/48462
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48462
--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas 2011-04-29 20:26:59
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Apr 29 20:26:56 2011
New Revision: 173185
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173185
Log:
2011-04-29 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/48462
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48746
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas 2011-04-29 20:26:59
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Apr 29 20:26:56 2011
New Revision: 173185
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173185
Log:
2011-04-29 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/48462
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48746
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas 2011-04-30 11:46:34
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Sat Apr 30 11:46:31 2011
New Revision: 173213
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173213
Log:
2011-04-30 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/48746
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48746
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas 2011-04-30 12:00:53
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Sat Apr 30 12:00:50 2011
New Revision: 173214
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173214
Log:
2011-04-30 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/48462
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48462
--- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas 2011-04-30 12:00:53
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Sat Apr 30 12:00:50 2011
New Revision: 173214
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173214
Log:
2011-04-30 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/48462
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48462
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48746
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||2011.05.11 09:25:24
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas 2011-05-11 19:57:21
UTC ---
Created attachment 24229
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24229
A fix for the PR
This fixes the problem in two steps:
(i) It reverts r162289; and
(ii) It adds the cor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas 2011-05-22 18:28:18
UTC ---
Created attachment 24332
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24332
A fix for the PR
This uses the same basic idea as Thomas' patch but is based on the original
logic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45081
--- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas 2010-09-26 09:04:38
UTC ---
I'll do 4.4 and 4.3 when I get back to Barcelona on Tuesday night.
Paul
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45081
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Summar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46339
--- Comment #26 from Paul Thomas 2010-11-21 07:18:04
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> The test program is:
snip
> type (particle_struct), optional, target :: p(:)
> real, pointer, optional :: axis(:)
>
> axis => p%r%vec(1)
>
> end s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42112
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42112
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas 2010-11-25 05:58:03
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
>
> This looks correct to me, unless F2003 forces a reallocation in ALLOCATE, when
> frealloc-lhs is in effect?
This is specifically not the case. The standa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42112
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas 2010-11-28 11:17:03
UTC ---
Tobias,
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > One probably needs:
> >
> > a) If "a" is no TARGET:
> > deallocate (a)
> > f(&a)
At present, this is not done. I g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35810
--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas 2010-11-28 13:47:31
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Nov 28 13:47:26 2010
New Revision: 167220
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167220
Log:
2010-11-28 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/35810
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas 2010-12-07 05:39:47
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Paul, this involves (for me) some heavy voodoo regarding conversion of
> strings to trees.
>
> Do you have any idea, by any chance?
Thomas,
The odd thing is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46896
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46896
--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas 2010-12-13 12:06:52
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
I spoke too soon :-(
> I do not believe that
> there will be any ere regressions since the patch adds temporaries where there
> were none before.
FAIL: gfortr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46896
--- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas 2010-12-14 05:35:00
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > The attached fixes the PR and is regtesting right now. I do not believe
> > that
> > there will be any ere regressions since
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955
--- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas 2011-05-26 18:19:40
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu May 26 18:19:36 2011
New Revision: 174302
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174302
Log:
2011-05-26 Paul Thomas
Thomas Koenig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955
--- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas 2011-05-26 20:49:11
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu May 26 20:49:07 2011
New Revision: 174308
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174308
Log:
2011-05-26 Paul Thomas
Thomas Koenig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49617
Summary: gcc misses uninititialized variables in contained
functions
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70673
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jun 27 19:18:21 2016
New Revision: 237802
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237802&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-27 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/70673
* frontend-passe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70673
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jun 27 20:54:56 2016
New Revision: 237804
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237804&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-27 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/70673
* frontend-passe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70673
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jun 27 20:57:13 2016
New Revision: 237805
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237805&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-27 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/70673
* frontend-passe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44265
--- Comment #16 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 38917
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38917&action=edit
Further development of the patch
This patch cures the problem described at the end of comment #1. The change in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71883
--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Jul 28 14:47:02 2016
New Revision: 238822
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238822&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-28 Steven G. Kargl
Thomas Koenig
PR fortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71883
--- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Jul 28 21:21:49 2016
New Revision: 238841
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238841&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-28 Steven G. Kargl
Thomas Koenig
PR fortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71883
--- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jul 29 05:16:05 2016
New Revision: 238848
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238848&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-29 Steven G. Kargl
Thomas Koenig
PR fortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71883
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2016-08-24
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 39495
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77358
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 24 19:33:14 2016
New Revision: 239740
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239740&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-24 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/77358
* resolve.c (res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77358
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 24 19:45:56 2016
New Revision: 239741
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239741&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-24 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/77358
* resolve.c (res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77358
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298
--- Comment #17 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 31 05:36:22 2016
New Revision: 239880
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239880&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-31 Paul Thomas
Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/48298
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Spotted by Steve Lionel, Intel.
As committed this morning, dtio_5.f90 contains a standard defying deallocation
at line 153.
deallocate(top)
To quote Steve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77418
--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 31 07:50:44 2016
New Revision: 239881
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239881&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-31 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/77418
* gfortran.dg/dt
||2016-08-31
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
I will take this one.
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99307
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #4)
> (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> > Reduced test
>
> While -fsanitize=address,undefined does not find anything on
> x86_64-gnu-linux, I do see w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99307
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 50386
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50386&action=edit
Fix for the PR
Juergen,
Thanks for the report and the reduction.
r11-6253-gce8dcc9105cbd404 exposed at e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99545
--- Comment #14 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #13)
> I confirm that with that patch our code compiles again, however, more or
> less all functionality fails because of runtime errors about
> Fortran runtime error:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99545
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99602
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #6)
> Actually, the last example missed a line that I overeagerly deleted too
> much. This one is the correct reproducer:
> module m
> implicit none
> private
> pub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99602
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99602
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99602
--- Comment #28 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #27)
> Created attachment 50432 [details]
> reproducer, down to 6800 lines
Hi Juergen,
Stop! Yesterday's final is just fine. The problem is connected with the logic
se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99602
--- Comment #30 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 50442
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50442&action=edit
Patch that "fixes" all versions of the problem.. so far :-)
Hi Juergen,
I think that this one does the job... i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99602
--- Comment #33 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #32)
> Ready for merge?
Hi Juergen,
Daytime work intervened. I will submit to the list today.
Thanks for all your support BTW.
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99818
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Started with r11-7188-gff6903288d96aa1d.
Thanks, Gerhard and Martin.
Have you ever tried to put a tent up in a storm? Sometimes maintaining gfortran
feels just lik
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99818
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99818
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to G. Steinmetz from comment #4)
> > Have you ever tried to put a tent up in a storm?
> ... geez, how difficult and lengthy ...
>
> The number of bug reports is admittedly increasing,
> but the numbe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99307
--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas ---
The patch was posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055923.html
I'll ping it.
Thanks Richard.
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100027
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
1601 - 1700 of 2378 matches
Mail list logo
