http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-11 19:57:21 UTC --- Created attachment 24229 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24229 A fix for the PR This fixes the problem in two steps: (i) It reverts r162289; and (ii) It adds the correct initialization for loop.reverse[] in gfc_trans_assignment_1. This was implemented incorrectly in the fix for PR24524 (in spite of the correct comment in dependency.c!) and removed at sometime, I do not know why. ****sigh**** Bootstraps and regtests on x86_64/FC9. I will add a testcase and submit formally tomorrow night. There are probably other assignements, such as in FOR and WHERE blocks that could do with reversing being enabled. I'll put thinking cap on after I have fixed this PR. Paul
