--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:19 ---
Subject: Bug 25102
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 30 05:19:34 2006
New Revision: 116579
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116579
Log:
2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:19 ---
Subject: Bug 24866
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 30 05:19:34 2006
New Revision: 116579
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116579
Log:
2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:19 ---
Subject: Bug 28885
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 30 05:19:34 2006
New Revision: 116579
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116579
Log:
2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:20 ---
Subject: Bug 20067
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 30 05:19:34 2006
New Revision: 116579
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116579
Log:
2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:31 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:31 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:31 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28873
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:32 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:32 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:33 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:34 ---
Helps to check the fixed box!
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 20:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=12159)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12159&action=view)
Patch for the PR
This is regtesting as I write. I do not doubt that it will pass because none
of th
--- Comment #24 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-01 15:32 ---
Fix posted - I await your goahead, HJ.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #34 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-05 04:26 ---
Subject: Bug 28908
Author: pault
Date: Tue Sep 5 04:26:10 2006
New Revision: 116690
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116690
Log:
2006-09-05 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #35 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-05 04:30 ---
Subject: Bug 28908
Author: pault
Date: Tue Sep 5 04:29:56 2006
New Revision: 116691
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116691
Log:
2006-09-05 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #36 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-05 04:32 ---
Closed, at last!
Thanks everybody.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-05 19:38 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> The proposed change in comment #8 appears to give several testsuite failures.
>
Yes, I know; see the email that I sent you today. The original patch on #5
works fine and is near
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-05 19:39 ---
A patch is ready but I have not had time to post it.
Watch the list this weekend.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-05 19:40 ---
A patch is ready but I have not had time to post it.
Watch the list this weekend.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-05 19:40 ---
A patch is ready but I have not had time to post it.
Watch the list this weekend.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-05 19:41 ---
I had better deal with this, since I am teh author of the wrong bit of logic.
Thanks
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-05 19:42 ---
The patch is mine!
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-05 19:43 ---
The patch is mine!
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-09 14:17 ---
I have just posted a patch to the list.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-09 14:18 ---
I have just posted the patch to the list.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 17:13 ---
Subject: Bug 28923
Author: pault
Date: Sun Sep 10 17:13:29 2006
New Revision: 116815
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116815
Log:
2006-09-10 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 17:18 ---
Subject: Bug 28959
Author: pault
Date: Sun Sep 10 17:17:57 2006
New Revision: 116816
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116816
Log:
2006-09-10 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 17:21 ---
Subject: Bug 28947
Author: pault
Date: Sun Sep 10 17:21:44 2006
New Revision: 116817
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116817
Log:
2006-09-10 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 17:27 ---
Subject: Bug 28947
Author: pault
Date: Sun Sep 10 17:26:54 2006
New Revision: 116818
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116818
Log:
2006-09-10 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 17:32 ---
Subject: Bug 28959
Author: pault
Date: Sun Sep 10 17:32:22 2006
New Revision: 116819
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116819
Log:
2006-09-09 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 17:32 ---
Subject: Bug 28947
Author: pault
Date: Sun Sep 10 17:32:22 2006
New Revision: 116819
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116819
Log:
2006-09-09 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 17:32 ---
Subject: Bug 28923
Author: pault
Date: Sun Sep 10 17:32:22 2006
New Revision: 116819
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116819
Log:
2006-09-09 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 19:43 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 19:44 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 19:44 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-11 05:03 ---
Subject: Bug 28890
Author: pault
Date: Mon Sep 11 05:02:58 2006
New Revision: 116839
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116839
Log:
2006-09-11 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-12 04:37 ---
Subject: Bug 28890
Author: pault
Date: Tue Sep 12 04:37:09 2006
New Revision: 116871
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116871
Log:
2006-09-12 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-12 04:38 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-12 08:59 ---
Oskar,
We believe that this bug is "fixed"; however, I will take you tst.f90 and put
it in the gfortran testsuite, since we do not know what moved to produce both
the regression and the "fix".
A
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-12 09:02 ---
Daniel,
This bug is fixed in more recent gfortrans. You will have a much easier life
if you upgrade; expecially to 4.2, for which binaries are available from the
gfortran wiki. If you have any difficulties with the
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-12 09:10 ---
John,
The ICE is fixed on recent versions of gfortran. However, I am keeping the PR
and giving it a new summary because the lack of a warning on the assumed shape
array is a problem that is related to others
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-12 19:38 ---
Subject: Bug 28971
Author: pault
Date: Tue Sep 12 19:38:48 2006
New Revision: 116904
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116904
Log:
2006-09-12 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 08:21 ---
Bud,
Quite by chance, I had noticed the cause of this a couple of days ago; if you
look at the Doxygen documentation for gfc_data, you will see that the only
reference to the locus field 'where' is in
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-14 16:45 ---
Have developed the above patch a tad and intend to submit tonight
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-14 20:05 ---
Iguchi-san and Tobi,
This has proven to be an "absorbing" bug and is indicative of a rather serious
malaise in the gfortran parser. As I surmised in the previous comment, it is
the assignments that are th
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-15 16:31 ---
Subject: Bug 29051
Author: pault
Date: Fri Sep 15 16:30:52 2006
New Revision: 116977
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116977
Log:
2006-09-15 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-15 16:39 ---
Subject: Bug 29051
Author: pault
Date: Fri Sep 15 16:38:51 2006
New Revision: 116978
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116978
Log:
2006-09-15 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-15 16:39 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Thanks, Bud
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 19:57 ---
See list for choice of fixes. I will submit my favourite tomorrow.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 19:58 ---
I propose to submit Tobi's patch
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 20:06 ---
GNU F95 version 4.2.0 20060916 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.2.0 20060916 (experimental).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096
In file
ult at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29115
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 06:25 ---
Subject: Bug 28817
Author: pault
Date: Mon Sep 18 06:24:54 2006
New Revision: 117014
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117014
Log:
2006-09-18 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 06:25 ---
Subject: Bug 29060
Author: pault
Date: Mon Sep 18 06:24:54 2006
New Revision: 117014
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117014
Log:
2006-09-18 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 06:25 ---
Subject: Bug 21918
Author: pault
Date: Mon Sep 18 06:24:54 2006
New Revision: 117014
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117014
Log:
2006-09-18 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 06:46 ---
Subject: Bug 28817
Author: pault
Date: Mon Sep 18 06:46:36 2006
New Revision: 117015
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117015
Log:
2006-09-18 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 06:46 ---
Subject: Bug 29060
Author: pault
Date: Mon Sep 18 06:46:36 2006
New Revision: 117015
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117015
Log:
2006-09-18 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 06:46 ---
Subject: Bug 21918
Author: pault
Date: Mon Sep 18 06:46:36 2006
New Revision: 117015
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117015
Log:
2006-09-18 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 06:53 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Problem is not in library side.
>
Jerry,
This is an easy one: Somebody forgot to add the post block for the evaluation
of the select expression to the block of code, for the specifi
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 06:54 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 06:55 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 06:56 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
Thanks, Tobi!
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 06:58 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > Where did this one go to? Can we close it?
>
> It is still funny looking code. I might take a look this weekend or on June 27
> when I am tr
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 07:49 ---
This fixes it:
Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
===
*** gcc/fortran/resolve.c (revision 117013)
--- gcc/fortran/resolve.c (working copy
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 19:29 ---
Thanks Steven, it was just too obvious, wasn't it?
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c(revision 117030)
+++ gcc/fo
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 20:20 ---
Subject: Bug 28526
Author: pault
Date: Mon Sep 18 20:19:50 2006
New Revision: 117034
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117034
Log:
2006-09-18 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 20:20 ---
Subject: Bug 29101
Author: pault
Date: Mon Sep 18 20:19:50 2006
New Revision: 117034
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117034
Log:
2006-09-18 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 22:02 ---
Subject: Bug 28817
Author: pault
Date: Mon Sep 18 22:02:24 2006
New Revision: 117038
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117038
Log:
2006-09-18 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 22:02 ---
Subject: Bug 29060
Author: pault
Date: Mon Sep 18 22:02:24 2006
New Revision: 117038
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117038
Log:
2006-09-18 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 22:02 ---
Subject: Bug 21918
Author: pault
Date: Mon Sep 18 22:02:24 2006
New Revision: 117038
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117038
Log:
2006-09-18 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 22:24 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 22:25 ---
integer, allocatable :: x(:)
integer :: i, j(2)
allocate (x(kind(i)), stat=i)
print *, size(x)
allocate (x(size(j)), stat=j(1))
print *, size(x)
end
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 22:26 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28526
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 11:05 ---
Subject: Bug 29101
Author: pault
Date: Tue Sep 19 11:04:55 2006
New Revision: 117053
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117053
Log:
2006-09-19 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 11:24 ---
Subject: Bug 29101
Author: pault
Date: Tue Sep 19 11:24:44 2006
New Revision: 117054
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117054
Log:
2006-09-19 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 11:26 ---
Thanks to Steven's intervention, I can declare this bug well and truly closed.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-24 14:55 ---
Ooops, I forgot to clear this.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #24 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-24 17:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=12320)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12320&action=view)
Patch + testcases for allocatable components
This version has all the known issues fixed and includes a
unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29211
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-25 16:21 ---
I have had to fix this to get on with the allocatable component patch. As soon
as I can (~24hrs), I will clear the tree and do a clean diff for this PR.
The principle is simple;
generate_loop_for_rhs_to_temp and
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-25 16:29 ---
Yup, does it for me too! Confirmed.
As soon as I am near no an F95 standard, I will confirm that a function result
should indeed be initialized; logic suggests that it should!
Paul
$ /irun/bin/gfortran --version
--- Comment #27 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-28 14:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=12350)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12350&action=view)
The latest version, incorporating all fixes so far.
This latest has an increasingly complete set of te
--- Comment #28 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-29 15:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=12354)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12354&action=view)
Patch that fixes Salvatore's latest
This patch moves the addition of EXPR_NULL for allocatable c
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-01 09:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=12364)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12364&action=view)
Fix for this problem
This seems to be my doing - I forgot all about missing optionals when I
introduc
--- Comment #32 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-02 21:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=12373)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12373&action=view)
A patch that fixes test_ab9.f90
You will see the modification in trans-types.c. This is the first bit
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 11:10 ---
I intend to submit the patch in #2, just as soon as the allocatable components
patch is out of the way.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 11:11 ---
I submitted a fix for this today.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 11:11 ---
I submitted a fix for this today.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 14:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=12377)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12377&action=view)
This fixes the bug.
This has to be sorted out at resolution time because it is the label 'vortex&
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 15:06 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> The problem lies in the absence of global actual/formal argument checking;
> where there is an explicit interface, all works correctly.
Actually, it is not as bad as I thought:
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 20:13 ---
Subject: Bug 29284
Author: pault
Date: Tue Oct 3 20:13:03 2006
New Revision: 117413
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117413
Log:
2006-10-03 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 20:13 ---
Subject: Bug 29322
Author: pault
Date: Tue Oct 3 20:13:03 2006
New Revision: 117413
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117413
Log:
2006-10-03 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 20:13 ---
Subject: Bug 25091
Author: pault
Date: Tue Oct 3 20:13:03 2006
New Revision: 117413
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117413
Log:
2006-10-03 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 20:13 ---
Subject: Bug 29321
Author: pault
Date: Tue Oct 3 20:13:03 2006
New Revision: 117413
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117413
Log:
2006-10-03 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 20:13 ---
Subject: Bug 25092
Author: pault
Date: Tue Oct 3 20:13:03 2006
New Revision: 117413
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117413
Log:
2006-10-03 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 20:15 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 20:15 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 20:16 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 20:16 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
801 - 900 of 3045 matches
Mail list logo
