--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-11 10:13 ---
I have had a brief attempt to resolve this one and have driven my head against
a brick wall!
Starting with this development of the original testcase:
! Rejects-valid. Fails with gfortran 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3
! For 4.3
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-11 19:12 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Breaking up the expression for h1, thusly:
hh = (/(exp(-2*pi*(0,1)*mod(k*L,N)/N)*h2(L),L=0,N-1)/)
h1 = (/(sum(hh),k=0,N-1)/)
cures the problem.
Paul
--
http
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-11 18:26 ---
Subject: Bug 34537
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jan 11 18:25:29 2008
New Revision: 131470
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131470
Log:
2008-01-11 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-11 18:27 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-11 22:01 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Will 2.5s do you on amd64/Cygwin_nt?
Index: gcc/fortran/array.c
===
*** gcc/fortran/array.c (revision 131469)
--- gcc/fortran
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-12 09:43 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Dominique,
Indeed - I found all those regressions when I got up this morning. However,
the patch indicates which way to go. The compiler is repeatedly trying to
expand an array that it
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-13 08:49 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> This is similar to 34432 is some ways. I think we are not matching the (\ \)
> correctly. I don't think gfc_match_expr has the tooling for it yet.
The error message is spu
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 08:00 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
It is sufficient that BA_T is referenced in tests; eg. by PRINT *, BA_T for the
problem to go away. Thus the problem is that the symbol is not being set as
referenced. I will try to find out
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 17:33 ---
This regression enters between 4.1/20050803 and 4.2/20061221.
gfc_check_constructor_type is applying the wrong type, because the intrinsic
has not been resolved. (This is called from gfc_match_init_expr via
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-17 06:23 ---
Toon,
I do not have time to fix this in the next day or two but this is a work
around:
type(grid_index_region),intent(out)::iregion(:)
I'll bet that with dimension nproc that no descriptor is
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-17 07:19 ---
Subject: Bug 34431
Author: pault
Date: Thu Jan 17 07:19:04 2008
New Revision: 131592
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131592
Log:
2008-01-17 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-17 07:19 ---
Subject: Bug 34471
Author: pault
Date: Thu Jan 17 07:19:04 2008
New Revision: 131592
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131592
Log:
2008-01-17 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-17 07:19 ---
Subject: Bug 34429
Author: pault
Date: Thu Jan 17 07:19:04 2008
New Revision: 131592
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131592
Log:
2008-01-17 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-17 10:12 ---
Fixed on trunk - see below for some remaining wrinkles, dug up by Tobias. I
will keep this pR open until both are fixed.
Paul
wrinkle #1: This one is easily fixed.
Index: gcc/fortran/decl.c
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-17 09:59 ---
Fixed on trunk - see PR34429 for some remaining wrinkles.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-17 10:00 ---
Fixed on trunk - see PR34429 for some remaining wrinkles.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-17 15:33 ---
I have a fix for this that I will apply as "obvious" overnight (in the EU, that
is:))
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-11 09:54 ---
It's mine, it's mine! I even posted a fix for it last night but have not had a
chance to commit it. I'll try to do so over the weekend.
As Jerry remarks, it sometimes goes away; such as on my x86_ia6
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-15 19:41 ---
Subject: Bug 35864
Author: pault
Date: Tue Apr 15 19:40:33 2008
New Revision: 134329
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=134329
Log:
2008-04-15 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-15 19:43 ---
Finally, I have managed to deal with this.
Sorry it took so long
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-16 20:53 ---
Subject: Bug 35932
Author: pault
Date: Wed Apr 16 20:53:07 2008
New Revision: 134364
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=134364
Log:
2008-04-16 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-16 21:02 ---
Subject: Bug 35932
Author: pault
Date: Wed Apr 16 21:02:10 2008
New Revision: 134366
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=134366
Log:
2008-04-16 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-16 21:07 ---
Fixed on 4.4 and 4.3
Thanks for the report
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-17 05:59 ---
Here is a further reduced version of the testcase:
program testprog
type :: t_type
integer, dimension(:), allocatable :: chars
end type t_type
integer, save :: callnb = 0
type(t_type) :: this
allocate
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-17 20:37 ---
This is indeed a bug. A fix will be posted in half an hour or so.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-18 21:02 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
>
> Please note off-by one in the last index.
>
Uros,
Indeed:) I'm snooping round trying to understand why the scalarizer has taken
to doing that. Not only is the offset
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-19 08:36 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I have started a regression hunt on this one. If any one finds the problem,
> let me know, the hunt could take a while.
>
Jerry,
In fixing PR35946, I have fixed this fella to
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-19 08:45 ---
This fixes it, albeit with one regression (scalarize_parameter_array_1.f90):
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
===
*** gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-19 21:56 ---
Subject: Bug 35959
Author: pault
Date: Sat Apr 19 21:55:24 2008
New Revision: 134472
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=134472
Log:
2008-04-19 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-19 21:56 ---
Subject: Bug 35944
Author: pault
Date: Sat Apr 19 21:55:24 2008
New Revision: 134472
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=134472
Log:
2008-04-19 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-19 21:56 ---
Subject: Bug 35946
Author: pault
Date: Sat Apr 19 21:55:24 2008
New Revision: 134472
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=134472
Log:
2008-04-19 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-19 21:56 ---
Subject: Bug 35947
Author: pault
Date: Sat Apr 19 21:55:24 2008
New Revision: 134472
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=134472
Log:
2008-04-19 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-19 22:31 ---
Subject: Bug 35947
Author: pault
Date: Sat Apr 19 22:30:03 2008
New Revision: 134475
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=134475
Log:
2008-04-19 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-19 22:31 ---
Subject: Bug 35959
Author: pault
Date: Sat Apr 19 22:30:03 2008
New Revision: 134475
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=134475
Log:
2008-04-19 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-19 22:31 ---
Subject: Bug 35944
Author: pault
Date: Sat Apr 19 22:30:03 2008
New Revision: 134475
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=134475
Log:
2008-04-19 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-19 22:31 ---
Subject: Bug 35946
Author: pault
Date: Sat Apr 19 22:30:03 2008
New Revision: 134475
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=134475
Log:
2008-04-19 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-19 22:32 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.3.
Thanks for the report.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-19 22:32 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.3.
Thanks for the report.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-19 22:32 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.3.
Thanks for the report.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-22 22:34 ---
> Paul, can you maybe shed any light on this?
>
Not for some days, I'm afraid. I'm in China, up to my eyeballs with day-time
work.
It'll be high priority when I get back.
Paul
--
http:/
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-28 11:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=15541)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15541&action=view)
Fix for this PR
This seems to do the job. The problem arises because the present version of
module.c d
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-28 21:03 ---
This is not "critical" in the gcc sense - I would change it back to normal if I
were you. After all, this feature of F95 has never worked correctly:)
Cheers
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-30 20:14 ---
Subject: Bug 35997
Author: pault
Date: Wed Apr 30 20:13:21 2008
New Revision: 134836
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=134836
Log:
2008-04-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-01 07:32 ---
Subject: Bug 35780
Author: pault
Date: Thu May 1 07:31:28 2008
New Revision: 134847
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=134847
Log:
2008-05-01 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-01 07:32 ---
Subject: Bug 35864
Author: pault
Date: Thu May 1 07:31:28 2008
New Revision: 134847
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=134847
Log:
2008-05-01 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-01 15:58 ---
This is now fixed on trunk and 4.3. The following version of the big, original
testcase works fine. If desired, it could be incorporated into the testsuite,
although I do not think that it adds anything.
Cheers
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-01 17:40 ---
Tobias,
Does this do the job?
Paul
Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
===
*** gcc/fortran/resolve.c (revision 134835)
--- gcc/fortran/resolve.c
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-01 19:47 ---
> Does this do the job?
BTW It breaks forall_7.f90 because it does not distinguish multiple sub-blocks
but, I suspect it cures the segfault/memory problem.
This needs a more intelligent approach to storing
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-13 20:27 ---
Subject: Bug 35997
Author: pault
Date: Tue May 13 20:26:47 2008
New Revision: 135273
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135273
Log:
2008-05-13 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-13 20:28 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.3
Thanks for the report.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
argument rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: pault at gcc dot g
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-13 21:34 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
This fixs it and regtests OK
Index: gcc/fortran/interface.c
===
*** gcc/fortran/interface.c (revision 134835)
--- gcc
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-14 05:15 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> OK to commit as simple.
>
Jerry,
In the clear light of day, I think that I need to separate the character and
the array checks. I'll check the standard and try other compile
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-14 20:44 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> Jerry,
>
> In the clear light of day, I think that I need to separate the character and
> the array checks. I'll check the standard and
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-14 21:33 ---
Subject: Bug 36233
Author: pault
Date: Wed May 14 21:32:53 2008
New Revision: 135307
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135307
Log:
2008-05-14 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 21:12 ---
Subject: Bug 35745
Author: pault
Date: Fri May 16 21:12:04 2008
New Revision: 135443
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135443
Log:
2008-05-16 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 21:12 ---
Subject: Bug 35756
Author: pault
Date: Fri May 16 21:12:04 2008
New Revision: 135443
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135443
Log:
2008-05-16 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 21:12 ---
Subject: Bug 35759
Author: pault
Date: Fri May 16 21:12:04 2008
New Revision: 135443
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135443
Log:
2008-05-16 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 21:12 ---
Subject: Bug 35743
Author: pault
Date: Fri May 16 21:12:04 2008
New Revision: 135443
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135443
Log:
2008-05-16 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-17 07:11 ---
Subject: Bug 36233
Author: pault
Date: Sat May 17 07:10:13 2008
New Revision: 135461
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135461
Log:
2008-05-17 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-17 07:11 ---
Subject: Bug 35743
Author: pault
Date: Sat May 17 07:10:13 2008
New Revision: 135461
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135461
Log:
2008-05-17 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-17 07:11 ---
Subject: Bug 35759
Author: pault
Date: Sat May 17 07:10:13 2008
New Revision: 135461
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135461
Log:
2008-05-17 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-17 07:11 ---
Subject: Bug 35745
Author: pault
Date: Sat May 17 07:10:13 2008
New Revision: 135461
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135461
Log:
2008-05-17 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-17 07:11 ---
Subject: Bug 35756
Author: pault
Date: Sat May 17 07:10:13 2008
New Revision: 135461
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135461
Log:
2008-05-17 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-17 07:16 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.3.
Thanks for the report.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-17 07:16 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.3.
Thanks for the report.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-17 07:17 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.3.
Thanks for the report.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-17 07:17 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.3.
Thanks for the report.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-17 08:20 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.3.
Thanks for the report.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-17 16:20 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created an attachment (id=15589)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15589&action=view) [edit]
> Very small code example
>
Frank,
The problem arise
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-18 10:03 ---
Confirmed.
This is quite revealing...
implicit none
character(len=5), dimension(3,3), parameter :: &
p = reshape(["a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f",
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-18 15:37 ---
> I have to admit, I did not quickly see in the dump (-fdump-tree-original) why
> it is failing; at a glance, both calling "neg_at" in MAIN__ and the assignment
> in "neg_at" itself look
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-18 16:00 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
The patch that I have been working on, which is held up by memory leak
problems, actually cures this fellow too.
I am active again on all the allocatable component bugs.
Watch this space
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-18 21:02 ---
Frank,
I am downgrading this to 'normal' severity - 'major' is reserved for fairly
cataclysmic bugs for the whole of gcc. 'ice-on-valid-code' will catch the
attention of gfortran deve
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-04 21:15 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
This PR is totally vexacious!
A number of things get rid of the ICE:
(i) Interchange test2 and test3;
(ii) Interchange the USE statements in test2; or
(iii) Make the component of outer a non
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-05 19:45 ---
> At the moment, I cannot see what draws these together. Nor can I see any
> difference in the .mod files for the cases that work
Ah... go it! gcc-4.2 had a derived type list for each namespace and ca
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-07 09:05 ---
Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
> ===
> *** gcc/fortran/resolve.c (revision 136412)
> --- gcc/fortran/resolve.c (wor
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-07 16:17 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
This comes about, indirectly, because of simplification. Change the the index
of the first item in the data list for 'c' to 2, for example. This can be
tracked back to
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-16 20:22 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Mark as waiting. Can any of you try whether the bug still exists for you?
>
This works for me - x86_ia64/Fedora8 - gcc version 4.4.0 20080615
Taking a risk, given Tobias' repor
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-17 18:09 ---
Subject: Bug 36366
Author: pault
Date: Tue Jun 17 18:08:24 2008
New Revision: 136871
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=136871
Log:
2008-06-17 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-17 18:09 ---
Subject: Bug 34396
Author: pault
Date: Tue Jun 17 18:08:24 2008
New Revision: 136871
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=136871
Log:
2008-06-17 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-17 19:33 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> At revision 136821 the following code:
Dominique,
It runs fine for me on x86_ia64 - did you use any options?
I've CC'd Jerry, since 136821 was his.
Paul
--
pault at gc
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-18 07:15 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> However, this is not different from 4.3. Using NAG f95, I get:
> Warning: line 26: REAL value for INTEGER PARAMETER
> Error:Explicit interface required for CHECK_INTEGER4_R
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-18 07:17 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Reopened.
Hah! OK - thanks
Paul *with tail between his legs*
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36342
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-20 10:43 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
This is due to an error in interface.c. The following fixes the fault,
bootstraps and regtests OK. I will apply as obvious just as soon as I can.
Paul
Index: gcc/fortran/interface.c
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-24 21:45 ---
Subject: Bug 36371
Author: pault
Date: Tue Jun 24 21:44:28 2008
New Revision: 137088
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137088
Log:
2008-06-24 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-24 21:45 ---
Subject: Bug 34371
Author: pault
Date: Tue Jun 24 21:44:28 2008
New Revision: 137088
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137088
Log:
2008-06-24 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-25 23:05 ---
Subject: Bug 36526
Author: pault
Date: Wed Jun 25 23:04:33 2008
New Revision: 137125
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137125
Log:
2008-06-25 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-23 16:28 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Hi FX
Your patch looks fine to me. In particular, you have tackled it at the right
place. However, I have a question: why is this not sufficient?
se.expr = gfc_evaluate_now (fold_convert
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-21 09:09 ---
Subject: Bug 25538
Author: pault
Date: Sat Jan 21 09:08:54 2006
New Revision: 110063
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110063
Log:
2005-01-21 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-21 09:09 ---
Subject: Bug 25625
Author: pault
Date: Sat Jan 21 09:08:54 2006
New Revision: 110063
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110063
Log:
2005-01-21 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-21 09:09 ---
Subject: Bug 23308
Author: pault
Date: Sat Jan 21 09:08:54 2006
New Revision: 110063
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110063
Log:
2005-01-21 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-21 09:09 ---
Subject: Bug 20881
Author: pault
Date: Sat Jan 21 09:08:54 2006
New Revision: 110063
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110063
Log:
2005-01-21 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-21 09:09 ---
Subject: Bug 25710
Author: pault
Date: Sat Jan 21 09:08:54 2006
New Revision: 110063
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110063
Log:
2005-01-21 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-22 19:54 ---
I have just posted the patch that I intend to commit tomorrow.
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25901
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 05:07 ---
Subject: Bug 25901
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jan 23 05:07:52 2006
New Revision: 110106
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110106
Log:
2005-01-23 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-26 05:31 ---
Huummmpfffhh! That's an annoying exception. It's straightforward to fix but I
will check the standard first.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-26 19:01 ---
The patch is on its way in the next hour or so
Statement functions = internal procedures, as far as the standard is concerned.
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25964
2401 - 2500 of 3045 matches
Mail list logo
