------- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-13 08:49 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > This is similar to 34432 is some ways. I think we are not matching the (\ \) > correctly. I don't think gfc_match_expr has the tooling for it yet.
The error message is spurious in my opinion. It is left on the stack from a failed match. As I say above, the problem is in simplification and, specifically, the simplification of reshape. Hang a gfc_show_expr_n in gfc_simplify_reshape for each of the arguments and see what happens. You will find, I believe, that the simplification is failing on arguments that look perfectly OK for reasons that I just do not understand. Good luck - I think that it is easily fixable but that one needs to alight on what triggers failure. Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34556
