--- Comment #4 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2009-10-20 12:19 ---
Subject: Re: [OOP] Calling one TBP as an actual argument
of another TBP
Oh bother! I completely forgot to test the subroutine branch - thanks Janus
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:30 PM, janus
--- Comment #7 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-02-14 19:54 ---
Subject: Re: unneeded temporary (2x)
Joost,
This time I beat you to it :-)
Dominique's problems on fortran-dev are fixed by a test for the
array_spec, which also fixes this one.
As so
--- Comment #9 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-02-16 08:59 ---
Subject: Re: ICE segfault when reading module file
> Ditto. (Don't forget "gfc_symbol *sym;" as I did in my posted patch as I
> failed
> to split three patches correctly.
--- Comment #12 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-02-16 11:01 ---
Subject: Re: ICE segfault when reading module file
Aahhh... thanks, I was going to attend to it myself.
Well thank you for the report :-)
Paul
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:53 AM, burnus at gcc dot
--- Comment #23 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-02-21 10:43 ---
Subject: Re: spurious _gfortran_internal_pack
I was going to check out the situation for 4.4. However, my
inclination is to close it. I'll be working on it tonight.
Cheers
Paul
On Sat, F
--- Comment #6 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-02-21 10:43 ---
Subject: Re: unneeded temporary (s=s+f(a))
Same as 41113 - I'll decide what to do tonight - see you on #gfortran?
Paul
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:48 PM, burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-02-22 09:06 ---
Subject: Re: unneeded temporary
Tobias,
I'll take a look tonight.
Cheers
Paul
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:58 AM, burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #4 from
--- Comment #4 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-02-25 12:50 ---
Subject: Re: Memory leaks in allocatable component
expressions
> --- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-25 07:38
> ---
> Paul, can you try with valgri
--- Comment #1 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-03-03 15:53 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] Missing array temp for DT
with pointer component
Yet another in the series :-) I hope that it is the last...
This bootstraps and regtests on RHEL5.2/x86_64
--- Comment #4 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-03-03 16:15 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] Wrong-code due to missing
array temp for DT with pointer component
Tobias,
Don't worry, I got it:-)
The patch fixes both problems.
Cheers
Paul
On Wed
--- Comment #3 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-03-10 13:20 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] 200.sixtrack fails setup
Dear All,
>
> Paul, I think you are the only gfortraner, which has access to SPEC CPU 2000.
> Can you have a look?
>
I am still
--- Comment #9 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-03-13 17:26 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] Wrong-code due to missing
array temp for DT with pointer component
HJ,
Thanks for doing all this backporting of the testcases.
As it happens, I have been
--- Comment #7 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-03-26 11:08 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] type mismatch
between an SSA_NAME and its symbol with -O3
Richi, Thanks for intervening. Paul
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:57 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #2 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-04-16 07:36 ---
Subject: Re: [fortran-dev Regression] ICE: segmentation
fault in mio_expr
Janus,
I am looking at this and PR42274; I will be in a hotel room the
evenings of next week and hope to get
--- Comment #25 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-04-20 09:31 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: segmentation fault
in mio_expr
Dominiq,
>
> Note for the record that it gives an additional error for PR43266 instead of
> the ICE:
>
&
--- Comment #26 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-04-25 18:28 ---
Subject: Re: [fortran-dev Regression] ICE: segmentation
fault
Dear Janus,
I thought that I would lend a helping hand, so I applied your latest
patch to my fortran-dev. Since I had left
--- Comment #28 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-04-25 18:59 ---
Subject: Re: [fortran-dev Regression] ICE: segmentation
fault
Janus,
Forget all of our last exchanges - I screwed up somehow with the
patch. This has nothing to do with your problem
--- Comment #7 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-01-14 12:04 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Wrong-code with
allocatable compounds
Dear Tobias,
I am just leaving on a trip. As it happens, I copied this PR onto my
memory stick, so I will have
--- Comment #11 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-01-21 20:25 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Wrong-code with
allocatable or pointer components in elemental functions
Thanks, Tobias.
I am not sure that it is unnecessary - for that reason, I am
--- Comment #3 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-02-04 05:33 ---
Subject: Re: ICE segfault when reading module file
Tobias,
I'll give it some thought at lunchtime.
Cheers
Paul
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:40 PM, burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-07-16 14:38 ---
Subject: Re: [4.6 Regression] Wrong decl for module vars /
FAIL: gfortran.dg/char_array_structure_constructor.f90
Dear Tobias,
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 2:08 PM, burnus at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #9 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-07-19 20:12 ---
Subject: Re: [OOP] poylmorphic operators do not work
Fixed on trunk
Paul
> Author: pault
> Date: Mon Jul 19 18:48:44 2010
> New Revision: 162313
>
> URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcv
--- Comment #9 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-07-22 10:00 ---
Subject: Re: Aliasing of TARGET dummy argument not
detected correctly
Dear Tobias,
> I think the patch below looks fine, however, if I set a break point, the
> fu
--- Comment #2 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-08-09 10:50 ---
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault with -fwhole-file for
subref_array_pointer
Dear Tobias,
> If one now recycles the definition for the array descriptor "desc" this
> in
--- Comment #4 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-08-15 16:32 ---
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault with -fwhole-file for subref_array_pointer
Dear Jerry,
> --- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-09 17:18
> ---
> Paul, can
--- Comment #4 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-08-21 12:17 ---
Subject: Re: Array-valued calles to elementals are not simplified
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 5:24 PM, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot e
--- Comment #9 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-09-16 09:43 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in
gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:4208
Thanks! Paul
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 9:06 AM, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
wrote
--- Comment #22 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-04-29 10:02 ---
Subject: Re: Weird temporary array allocation
> As an aside, for the 4.6 array descriptor update, there has been some
> discussion to move from the current (lbound, ubound, stride) tripl
--- Comment #12 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-05-24 08:31 ---
Subject: Re: Missing interface not detected in call to
same file function
With -fwhole-file, we get for the short testcase:
../pr36553/pr36553.f90:2.9:
print *, f( (/ 0.0, 1.0
--- Comment #9 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-05-25 20:57 ---
Subject: Re: unneeded temporary
Mikael,
Yes, I am sure that you are right about the <>.
Let's close it :-)
Paul
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:52 PM, mikael at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #10 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-06-05 06:55 ---
Subject: Re: inline matmul for small matrix sizes
Dear Thomas,
> The preferred way would therefore be to state the rank 2 * rank 2 problem as
>
> do i=1,m
> do j=1,n
>
--- Comment #13 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-06-22 04:36 ---
Subject: Re: gfortran generates wrong results due to wrong
ABI in function with array return
Dear Tobias,
Thanks for looking through the patch.
> Does use_assoc also include h
--- Comment #3 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-06-22 19:15 ---
Subject: Re: [OOP] Dynamic dispatch uses broken types
Dear Tobias,
> --- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-22 15:00
> ---
> CC Paul as he might have an id
--- Comment #4 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-06-23 17:36 ---
Subject: Re: [OOP] Dynamic dispatch uses broken types
Tobias,
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 5:00 PM, burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gn
--- Comment #15 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-06-27 14:39 ---
Subject: Re: [OOP] ICE on array-valued function with CLASS
formal argument
> --- Comment #14 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-27 13:16
> ---
> (In reply to co
--- Comment #25 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-06-28 04:27 ---
Subject: Re: Scalarization of reductions
Dear Mikael,
> - gfc_find_sym_tree (name, gfc_current_ns, 0, &st);
> - st->n.sym = *result;
> st = gfc_ge
--- Comment #17 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-06-28 06:47 ---
Subject: Re: gfortran generates wrong results due to wrong
ABI in function with array return
OK, I have regtested a submittable version this morning. I will do
the business tonight.
Paul
--- Comment #14 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-07-05 13:52 ---
Subject: Re: [OOP] Dynamic dispatch uses broken types
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 3:14 PM, burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
wrote:
> Thanks for checking, Richard!
Indeed, seconded by me.
Is th
--- Comment #16 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-07-05 15:47 ---
Subject: Re: [OOP] Dynamic dispatch uses broken types
> --- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de 2010-07-05 14:06 ---
Now I take a look at build_pointer_type_for_mode and it
--- Comment #19 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-07-06 15:28 ---
Subject: Re: [OOP] Dynamic dispatch uses broken types
Dear Tobias,
> Paul, thanks for the check in. Do you plan to backport it to 4.5, which sems
> to
> use the same code?
Yes, I coul
--- Comment #12 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-07-08 15:32 ---
Subject: Re: [4.6 Regression] Unnecessary temporaries
increase the runtime for channel.f90 by ~70%
Tobias,
That is the context - apply it and see.
Paul
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:33 PM
--- Comment #20 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-07-12 06:31 ---
Subject: Re: [4.6 Regression] Unnecessary temporaries
increase the runtime for channel.f90 by ~70%
4.3 is not so easy - it's throwing a load of regressions. I'll spend
some ti
42 matches
Mail list logo
