------- Comment #4 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-03-03 16:15 -------
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] Wrong-code due to missing
array temp for DT with pointer component
Tobias,
Don't worry, I got it:-)
The patch fixes both problems.
Cheers
Paul
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:53 PM, burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
<gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-03 15:53
> -------
> As it might have not been completely clear from comment 0:
>
> type t
> [...]
> integer, pointer :: b(:)
> end type
> type(t) :: y
> y%b => z(::2)
> call bar(y%b) ! <<< WRONG-CODE: Here a temporary is missing
>
> Without the temporary, [1,2,3] instead of [1,3,5] is passed to "bar" and thus
> the example fails with a call to ABORT. (The rest of example illustrates a
> missed optimization, which is not a regression.)
>
>
> --
>
> burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Known to fail| |4.5.0
> Known to work| |4.3.5 4.4.3
> Priority|P3 |P4
> Summary|[4.5 Regression] Missing |[4.5 Regression] Wrong-code
> |array temp for DT with |due to missing array temp
> |pointer component |for DT with pointer
> | |component
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43243
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43243
