http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #63 from Oleg Endo ---
Created attachment 30566
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30566&action=edit
Reduced test
(In reply to Laurent Aflonsi from comment #58)
> Created attachment 30524 [details]
> functional regres
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #64 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Laurent Aflonsi from comment #61)
>
> The movt(L2) and the tst(L3) are both removed, and that's coherent for that
> run path, because it is preceded by the tst r2,r2.
> But that makes the first path
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target: sh*-*-*
On SH unsigned int comparisons against some constants can be converted to shift
and test sequences to potentially save one register.
For example:
int test_00
||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo ---
The same applies to SH and probably other targets that use constant pools in
the text sections.
||2013-07-28
CC||eraman at google dot com,
||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo ---
With SVN rev 201282, SH cross compiler and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54682
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo ---
A related case, but the other way around:
#include
std::bitset<32> make_bits (void)
{
std::bitset<32> r;
for (auto&& i : { 4, 5, 6, 10 })
if (i < r.size ())
r.set (i);
return r;
}
results in t
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: steven at gcc dot gnu.org, tejohnson at google dot com
Target: sh*-*-*
On SH, compiling the following code with -O2
#include
std::bitset<32> make_bits (void)
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58033
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo ---
... according to the changelog you've been doing some things on bb-reorder.c,
maybe you have an idea?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58033
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo ---
Created attachment 30574
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30574&action=edit
bbro dump
(In reply to Teresa Johnson from comment #2)
>
> I assume it is the above branch that is the issue (not th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53513
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo ---
See also PR 29349.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #65 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #64)
>
> would be simplified to this:
>
> mov.l @(4,r4),r1
> tst r1,r1 // T = @(4,r4) == 0
> .L3:
> bt/s.L5
> mov #1,r1
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53976
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #2)
> Interestingly, the following function shows some improved behavior (notice
> the removed volatile mem store):
>
> int test_2_1 (int* a, int b, int c)
> {
> a[1] = b !=
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12081
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |other
--- Comment #26 from Oleg Endo ---
I d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12081
--- Comment #29 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #28)
> (In reply to Michael Meissner from comment #27)
> > The patch from Oleg Endo breaks the PowerPC build.
> >
> > .../gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c: In function ‘void
> > r
,
||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo ---
Kaz, maybe you have an idea whether/how this could be improved?
mal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
This one was originally reported here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2013-08/msg00124.html
The original example was:
#include
template
inlin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58122
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #0)
>
> I've checked this with an SH cross compiler setup, but I don't think it
> matters.
> The loops do get eliminated if the number of loop iterations is max. 17, for
> both
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58122
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo ---
Looking at the tree dump (-fdump-tree-all -fdump-tree-all-details), it seems
that this is related to loop unrolling (dump file *t.cunroll) and induction
variable optimization.
If the number of iterations is small
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53976
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo ---
One option to get rid of the redundant clrt and sett in BBs that are reached
with a conditional branch would be to add an SH specific RTL pass that analyses
the BBs and eliminates the insns in question.
Another o
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target: sh2a*-*-*
As of rev 201282, when compiling for SH2A mov.l insn lengths are wrongly set to
4 bytes:
int test (int* x)
{
return x[0];
}
void test (int* x, int y)
{
x[0] = y
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #66 from Oleg Endo ---
Created attachment 30689
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30689&action=edit
WIP RTL pass
Just wanted to give an update on the issue.
I've been writing an SH specific RTL pass that handles tho
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12081
--- Comment #31 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Thu Aug 29 18:37:46 2013
New Revision: 202083
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202083&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2013-08-05 Oleg Endo
PR other/12081
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12081
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54272
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo ---
Another example where addv could be used:
int test (int a)
{
if (a == 0x7FFF)
return a;
return a + 1;
}
currently compiles to:
-O2 -m2a:
mov.l .L6,r1
cmp/eq r1,r4
bt.s
|NEW
Last reconfirmed||2013-09-20
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo ---
FPUL handling seems to need some work in general, see also
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54236
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo ---
Some more addc candidates I ran into:
int test00 (int a, int b, int c, int d)
{
return (d & 1) + a + b;
}
-O2 -m4:
mov r7,r0
and #1,r0
add r4,r0
rts
add
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target: sh*-*-*
While working on something else, I've noticed the following sequence in the
CSiBE set in the file zlib-1.1.4/infbl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #30689|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52941
--- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo 2012-04-30 19:16:31
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > Created attachment 27173 [details]
> > Proposed patch
>
> Looks even better.
>
> > Only one thing ... is it safe to do the
> > "@-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52941
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27173|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50751
--- Comment #29 from Oleg Endo 2012-04-30
19:37:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> I'm now trying to work around this by adding special insn_and_split patterns
> for the reload phase and removing the displacement addressing special cases in
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53250
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|sh4-unknown-linux-gnu |sh*-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53250
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo 2012-05-06 18:04:27
UTC ---
Created attachment 27326
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27326
Proposed patch
(In reply to comment #0)
> On sh4-unknown-linux-gnu, there are many new failures after re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176
--- Comment #20 from Oleg Endo 2012-05-06
19:21:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> "olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org" writes:
> > --- Comment #18 from Oleg Endo 2012-05-06
> > 18:09:37 UTC ---
> > On SH an issue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53250
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo 2012-05-06 22:39:01
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sun May 6 22:38:57 2012
New Revision: 187218
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187218
Log:
PR target/53250
* config/sh/sh.c (sh_rtx_cos
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53268
Bug #: 53268
Summary: [4.8 Regression] [SH] libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp
failures
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #37 from Oleg Endo 2012-05-07
20:50:31 UTC ---
Created attachment 27336
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27336
Supplementary patch
As of rev 187217, the pr51244-1.c target testcase fails at least for m4*.
The attac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #38 from Oleg Endo 2012-05-08
21:36:35 UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Tue May 8 21:36:30 2012
New Revision: 187298
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187298
Log:
PR target/51244
* config/sh/sh.md (*branch_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53268
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53511
Bug #: 53511
Summary: SH Target: Add support for fma patterns
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51340
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53512
Bug #: 53512
Summary: SH Target: Allow fsca and fsrra for non-SH4A
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53513
Bug #: 53513
Summary: SH Target: Add support for fschg and fpchg insns
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52941
--- Comment #11 from Oleg Endo 2012-05-29
20:26:46 UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Tue May 29 20:26:41 2012
New Revision: 187987
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187987
Log:
PR target/52941
* config/sh/predicates.md (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51340
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo 2012-05-29 20:56:02
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Tue May 29 20:55:58 2012
New Revision: 187988
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187988
Log:
PR target/51340
* config/sh/sh.c (sh_option_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51340
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29366
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|52941 |
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo 2012-05-29 21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52971
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52642
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo 2012-05-31 23:01:22
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Thu May 31 23:01:13 2012
New Revision: 188087
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188087
Log:
Backport from mainline
2012-03-21 Kaz Kojim
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52667
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo 2012-05-31 23:04:08
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Thu May 31 23:04:02 2012
New Revision: 188089
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188089
Log:
Backport from mainline
2012-03-27 Chung-Lin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53512
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo 2012-06-03 11:26:58
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sun Jun 3 11:26:54 2012
New Revision: 188149
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188149
Log:
PR target/53512
* sh.opt (mfsca, mfsrra): Ne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53512
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||2012-06-03
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53511
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo 2012-06-03 18:01:31
UTC ---
Created attachment 27547
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27547
Propo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53511
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53568
Bug #: 53568
Summary: SH Target: Add support for bswap built-ins
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53579
Bug #: 53579
Summary: libstdc++ configure atomicity tests use CXXFLAGS
instead of CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29366
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||53579
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo 2012-06-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53511
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27547|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53511
--- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo 2012-06-05 20:08:08
UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #4)
>
> Make -mfused-madd no-op instead to remove for the backward
> compatibility.
Sorry, I don't quite follow. According to my understanding we have
something l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53511
--- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo 2012-06-05 20:12:51
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Looking into the __builtin_sh_media_FMAC_S implementation, it takes
> 2 floating arguments and one return float value. It looks that
> "a = __builtin_sh_media_F
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53511
--- Comment #10 from Oleg Endo 2012-06-05
23:06:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Yes. -mfused-madd is for a micro optimization after all. It would
> be tolerable even if it can't generate fmac insns in the case like (*).
> OTOH deleting th
||2012-06-10
CC||kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org,
||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo 2012-06-10 19:13:44
UTC ---
(In reply to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53511
--- Comment #12 from Oleg Endo 2012-06-11
19:24:24 UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Mon Jun 11 19:24:20 2012
New Revision: 188396
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188396
Log:
PR target/53511
* config/sh/sh.md (fmasf4):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53568
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50749
--- Comment #12 from Oleg Endo 2012-06-12
07:09:58 UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Tue Jun 12 07:09:52 2012
New Revision: 188426
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188426
Log:
PR target/50749
* gcc.target/sh/pr50749-sf-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53511
--- Comment #13 from Oleg Endo 2012-06-12
18:25:46 UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Tue Jun 12 18:25:40 2012
New Revision: 188471
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188471
Log:
PR target/53511
* gcc.target/sh/pr51340-1.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53568
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo 2012-06-13 18:45:56
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Wed Jun 13 18:45:17 2012
New Revision: 188524
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188524
Log:
PR target/53568
* config/sh/sh.md (bswapsi2)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53568
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo 2012-06-14 19:33:17
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Thu Jun 14 19:33:10 2012
New Revision: 188632
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188632
Log:
PR target/53568
* config/sh/sh.md: Add peeph
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52941
--- Comment #13 from Oleg Endo 2012-06-16
08:30:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Probably, you should update libjava/sysdep/sh/locks.h as well.
Just for the record, this was fixed by:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg00971.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #39 from Oleg Endo 2012-06-30
12:00:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 27724
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27724
Another patch
I have noticed that the branch_true and branch_false insns also require
some subreg varia
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #40 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-02
19:24:03 UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Mon Jul 2 19:23:56 2012
New Revision: 189177
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189177
Log:
PR target/51244
* config/sh/predicates.md (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53568
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-02 23:00:05
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Mon Jul 2 22:59:59 2012
New Revision: 189181
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189181
Log:
PR target/53568
* gcc.target/sh/pr53568-1.c:
||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-02 23:37:59
UTC ---
I'm not sure since when, but at least as of rev 189180 (4.8) this problem does
not occur anymore.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53689
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-06 17:59:34
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Under target (sh-elf) big-endian SuperH-2 (SH7604) (options -m2 -mb
> -fno-omit-frame-pointer).
>
> When defining an interrupt handler:
> static void __attribut
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39423
--- Comment #15 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-06
22:04:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 27754
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27754
combine pass based patch
A possible combine pass based solution for the problem.
It fixes the case ment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53886
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53886
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53886
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-08 12:19:09
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created attachment 27763 [details]
> preprocessed src
>
> Sorry, I had tried to attach it during the bug creation but I didn't notice it
> didn't take.
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53886
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|sh4-unknown-linux-gnu |sh*-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53886
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-08 13:45:28
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > The patch below fixes this particular crash, but I'm not sure whether it is
> > the right thing to do in this case.
>
> Looks fine
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #41 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-08
15:03:26 UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sun Jul 8 15:03:21 2012
New Revision: 189360
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189360
Log:
PR target/51244
* config/sh/sh.md (*branch_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53886
--- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-09 22:39:29
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Mon Jul 9 22:39:25 2012
New Revision: 189394
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189394
Log:
PR target/53886
* config/sh/sh.c (sequence_i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53911
Bug #: 53911
Summary: [SH] Improve displacement addressing
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53911
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-10 22:01:53
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Tue Jul 10 22:01:44 2012
New Revision: 189416
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189416
Log:
PR target/53911
* config/sh/sh.md: Remove di
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53886
--- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-10 22:07:36
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Tue Jul 10 22:07:29 2012
New Revision: 189417
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189417
Log:
PR target/53886
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr53
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53886
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53689
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-11 13:05:59
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > (In reply to comment #0)
> > > Under target (sh-elf) big-endian SuperH-2 (SH7604) (options -m2 -mb
>
> > I've checked this case wit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39423
--- Comment #18 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-11
15:09:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Created attachment 27775 [details]
> plus add combine
>
> Here is the patch that I've been running since some time, it also use the same
> combine pattern mat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11708
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||WORKSFORME
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-11 23:44:40
UTC ---
As of rev 189427 this seems to be OK. Probably the described cases were side
effects of other issues which have been solved.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53949
Bug #: 53949
Summary: [SH] Add support for mac.w / mac.l instructions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39423
--- Comment #21 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-13
09:36:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> I like your mem,plus,plus combine that look better than my folding. just there
> are 2 little details that I tried while playing with it: there was a
> lost of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53949
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-13 10:34:20
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> So far, GCC does not utilize the integer multiply-add instructions.
> On SH1 only the mac.w instruction is supported.
> On SH2 and above the mac.w and mac.l inst
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53949
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-15 12:11:20
UTC ---
Created attachment 27799
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27799
Proof of concept patch
This is a proof of concept patch just to probe around.
The idea is to allow the R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29969
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33135
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53689
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53976
Bug #: 53976
Summary: [SH] Unnecessary clrt after bt
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
301 - 400 of 1963 matches
Mail list logo
