clean tree which was the fix before.
That doesn't find it, either
the build is currently broken as it worked yesterday or something is wrong with
my config command.
Nick
ser-plugin --enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-gtk-cairo
--with-java-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-5-amd64/jre --enable-java-home
--with-jvm-root-dir=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-5-amd64
--with-jvm-jar-dir=/usr/lib/jvm-exports/java-1.5.0-gcj-5-amd64
--with-arch-directory=amd64 --with-ecj-jar=/usr/share/java/eclipse-ecj.jar
--enable-objc-gc --enable-multiarch --disable-werror --with-arch-32=i686
--with-abi=m64 --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --enable-multilib
--with-tune=generic --enable-checking=release --build=x86_64-linux-gnu
--host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.4.0 20160609 (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4)
Huge Thanks for any help,
Nick
? Or maybe the rules in
t-sh need to be updated to include an architecture selection switch
? (eg -m2a-single ?)
Cheers
Nick
running regressions tests to see if it
introduces any new problems. (I doubt that it will, but it never hurts
to check).
Cheers
Nick
}
if (mips_tls_operand_p (src))
But I am pretty sure that this is the wrong solution. Since I am
not a MIPS expert however I am punting this problem to you guys. :-)
Cheers
Nick
ff as you guys.
I might have time to try a fix this weekend. Please feel free
to file a bug report and assign it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have created a PR (31388) but I do not have the authority to assign it
you.
Cheers
Nick
n gcc somewhere
(that assumes that a long will fit into a register) or whether there
is something mips specific about the problem. (One thing telling
gcc that a long is 32-bits and another thing tell it that they are
64-bits).
What do you think ?
Cheers
Nick
store_df_high
pattern in mips.md.
Any clues or solutions ?
Cheers
Nick
128201-files.tar.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
ough it would fail if
the alignment power is sufficiently large to cause the left shift to
overflow an integer. So I am going to check in a variant of this
change:
offset &= (bfd_vma)~((1L << s->alignment_power) - 1L);
which I think should satisfy everyone. I will also c
uld like to know if the gcc
error message is really correct, or if I have run across a
gimplification bug.
Cheers
Nick
this problem and added a comment to PR 22371
mentioning that 33122 might be a duplicate.
Cheers
Nick
nk. Is this a generic bitfield allocation problem in
gcc ?
Cheers
Nick
Anyone who doesn't hate homework is
cr'r'r'r'r'r'r'r'r'r'raz'z'z'zz'z'z'z'z'z'z'z'zy!
Nick Cocchiarella
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: coo
tdio/vfprintf.c:480: internal compiler error: verify_gimple
failed
This is from a mips64vr-elf target, but I have the same failure with
mipsisa32-elf and mipsisa64-elf targets as well.
Cheers
Nick
assume that it is because the C6X has more than one delay slot ?
Cheers
Nick
nal jump pattern, but I am
loath to do so because I have found that gcc tends to have issues with
jump insns that contain parallels.
Any suggestions ?
Cheers
Nick
ate a binutils AVR bug report, but I need a working
toolchain).
Cheers
Nick
been looking at the loop invariant
code trying to figure out what needs to be changed, but so far I
have not been able to puzzle it out.
I think that the real problem might be the clobbers in the
ineqbranchsi pattern, but I do not know how it could be changed to
fix this.
Any ideas ?
Cheers
Nick
ux-gnulibc
toolchain, so I abandoned it. (I did not investigate why it caused
regressions, I just assumed that my approach was wrong).
Cheers
Nick
toolchain was
building OK at the end of November...
Cheers
Nick
attempt to call a function
called "memset" if it is compiling code inside a function called
"memset". The problem is, I cannot see an easy way of enforcing this.
The memset builtin expander is called from several different places
and I am not at all sure how, or if, they should be modified. Any
clues ?
Cheers
Nick
e type3 structure in bug.c is given another,
non-zero-length field, then the test passes.
Cheers
Nick
#include
#include
#include
typedef int * type1;
typedef struct
{
union u1 { double f1; long int f2; } f3[0];
} type3;
typedef int type4;
static type1 arg1 = 0;
static double arg2 = 1.
Hi Richard,
+ /* Even zero-sized arguments occupy one byte. */
+ if (size == 0)
+ size = 1;
That fixes it! Thanks.
Will you apply this patch yourself, or should I submit the patch and the
test case as a separate email to gcc-patches ?
Cheers
Nick
r class B is
run, but the destructor for class B is permanently recorded in the
.dtors section. Since the exit() function runs the things recorded
with atexit() first, before calling _exit() which runs the
destructors in the .dtors section, the destructor for A is called
before the destructor for B.
Can anyone clarify this for me ? Is this a bug with the current G++
implementation ?
Cheers
Nick
"Please report any bugs to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing-list."
I would like to report a real bug when trying to run gfortran on an Athlon
processor (See end of this email).
Nick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host gcc.gnu.org[209.132.176.174] said: 550 Sorry,
there is no mailbox for [EMAIL
work, but I am wary about the AND pattern - it looks like
it uses short cuts for certain sizes of integer and I do not
know enough about the AM33 ISA to know if these short cuts are
valid when address registers are involved.
Can you offer any advice ? Is this a reload problem whereby "sp"
should be moved into a data register ?
Cheers
Nick
be an attempt to register a builtin type using
the float128_type_node, which is NULL for these particular targets:
gcc/config/ia64/ia64.c:10373
gcc/config/i386/i386.c:33347
Presumably float128_type_node should not be NULL, but I am not sure
how to fix this. Any suggestions ?
Cheers
Nick
nt to get target
greping wrong.
So - Jan, Uros, Jim, Steve - are these ia64 and i386 backend patches OK ?
Cheers
Nick
gcc/ChangeLog
2016-08-25 Nick Clifton
* config/ia64/ia64.c (ia64_init_builtins): Initialise the
float128_type_node if that has not been d
the type is
> not fully supported. You need a different name for the local node, e.g.
> i386_float128_type_node (and then update all back-end uses to use the
> local node).
Oh, OK - new patch in the works.
Cheers
Nick
y: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: nick at ilm dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_6
--- Additional Comments From nick at ilm dot com 2005-04-12 02:37 ---
I meant to say that it succedes with i686-pc-linux-gnu not x86-unknown-linux-gnu
> /dept/rnd/vendor/gcc-4.0.0-20050410/bin/gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-4.0.0-20050
--- Additional Comments From nick at ilm dot com 2005-04-12 02:42 ---
mislabeled as c - should be c++
compiling as c on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu succedes
compiling as c++ on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu fails
compiling as c on i686-pc-linux-gnu succedes
compiling as c++ on i686-pc-linux
signed at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: nick at ilm dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21012
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21012
--- Additional Comments From nick at ilm dot com 2005-04-14 02:15 ---
testcase compiles successfuly with gcc-4.0.0-20050410
on x68 and amd64, removed 4.0.0 from known to fail line.
--
What|Removed |Added
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: nick at ilm dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-lin
e function gets instantiated.
-nick
--
Summary: arguments incorrectly named in static member
specialization
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid, rejects-
||valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
amd64
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: nick at ilm dot com
CC: gcc
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19744
--- Additional Comments From nick at sqrt dot co dot uk 2005-03-06 15:51
---
This is a longstanding bug that still occurs for the 4.0 branch.
For ARM change:
Integer'Min (2, Standard'Maximum_Alignment);
to:
Integer'Min (4, Standard'Maximum_Alig
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: nick at sqrt dot co dot uk
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: arm-linux-elf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20797
correctly resolved
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: nick dot orlov at mail dot ru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35631
--- Comment #2 from nick dot orlov at mail dot ru 2008-03-19 12:44 ---
Standard says:
11.4.6. A function can be defined in a friend declaration of a class if and
only if the class is a non-local class (9.8), the function name is unqualified,
and the function has namespace scope
dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: nick dot spence at freescale dot com
GCC build triplet: gcc version 4.1.2 20070626 (Red Hat 4.1.2-13)
GCC host triplet: i386-redhat-linux
GCC target triplet: i386-redhat-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36232
--- Comment #1 from nick dot spence at freescale dot com 2008-05-13 19:51
---
Created an attachment (id=15636)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15636&action=view)
Example code source file
Compile with 'gcc -Os test.c' or 'gcc -O2 test.c'
--- Comment #2 from nick dot spence at freescale dot com 2008-05-13 19:52
---
Created an attachment (id=15637)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15637&action=view)
Compiler intermediate file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36232
--- Comment #3 from nick dot spence at freescale dot com 2008-05-13 19:56
---
The code has two loops, which compile correctly when no optimization, or
-O1 are used, but the second loop becomes infinite if -Os or -O2 is used.
.file "test.c"
--- Comment #6 from nick dot spence at freescale dot com 2008-05-13 20:41
---
1) Since most bootloaders are written in C your view is very interesting but
probably not shared by everyone else working with embedded software.
2) If the compiler now treats this as an undefined condition
dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: nick at sqrt dot co dot uk
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21958
upports_ada=${acx_cv_cc_gcc_supports_ada='no'}
acx_cv_prog_LN=${acx_cv_prog_LN='ln'}
gcc_cv_prog_cmp_skip=${gcc_cv_prog_cmp_skip='cmp $$f1 $$f2 16 16'}
gcc_cv_prog_ln_s_dir=${gcc_cv_prog_ln_s_dir='yes'}
--
Summary: Fails to build bootstrap under solaris 10, i386
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: nick dot kings at bt dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29741
: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: nick at ludocode dot com
Target Milestone: ---
In file a.c:
#define FOO foo
typedef int FOO;
typedef short FOO;
gcc a.c
a.c:1:13: error: conflicting types for ‘foo’
1 | #define FOO foo
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: nick dot cheng at areca dot com dot tw
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35550
53 matches
Mail list logo
