Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marejde at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The following program:
#include
#include
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
std::error_code error_code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71415
--- Comment #1 from Martin Ejdestig ---
Sorry, a copy paste error slipped in. Last print out should be:
std::cout << "error_code operator bool: " << (error_code ? true : false) <<
'\n';
Output is still the same though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71415
--- Comment #3 from Martin Ejdestig ---
> The semantics of exists(const path&, error_code&) are precisely specified,
> and > I think this behaviour is correct according to the specification. This
> is also > consistent with Boost.Filesystem.
O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71415
--- Comment #5 from Martin Ejdestig ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> A new issue should get added to
> http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-active.html
Thank you.
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marejde at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The following program:
#include
#include
#include
#include
int main(void)
{
std::recursive_timed_mutex mutex
ty: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marejde at gmail dot com
Reading http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/chrono/operator%22%22min (sorry, I do
not have the spec readily available) it says:
"In addit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65499
--- Comment #1 from Martin Ejdestig ---
See the end of 20.12.2 ("Header synopsis").
Maybe it is too late for 5.0?
