https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71415

--- Comment #3 from Martin Ejdestig <marejde at gmail dot com> ---
> The semantics of exists(const path&, error_code&) are precisely specified, 
> and > I think this behaviour is correct according to the specification. This 
> is also > consistent with Boost.Filesystem.

Oh, OK. It seems odd to me that an error is signaled for something that should
be considered "normal operations" though.

> I'll discuss with the C++ committee whether this behaviour is really 
> desirable, > but it seems to be what the spec requires, and not a bug in GCC.

OK, thanks.

Is there some way for me to track the discussion? The isocpp.org Google group?
Or is there e.g. some other mailing list where std::filesystem is discussed? I
am just curious. :)

Reply via email to