https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99316
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96357
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew.goodbody at linaro do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93235
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99195
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Using a define_subst like:
(define_subst "add_vec_concat_subst"
[(set (match_operand:VDMOV 0 "" "")
(match_operand:VDMOV 1 "" ""))]
"!BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN"
[(set (match_operand: 0 "regi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99312
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99437
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Assignee|unass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99520
Bug ID: 99520
Summary: Failure to detect bswap pattern
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99520
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Consider e.g.
> unsigned foo (unsigned x)
> {
> return (x<<24) + ((x<<8)&0xff) + ((x>>8)&0xff00) + (x>>24) +
> (((x&0xff00)<<16)>>8);
> }
> as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99520
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
FWIW the version in the initial comment is what appears in 525.x264_r in
SPEC2017
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99540
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.3
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99560
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
Last rec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99593
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11 Regression] arm MVE ICE |[11 Regression] arm Neon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96825
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99593
--- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #7)
> Created attachment 50412 [details]
> proposed testcase
>
> Here is a proposal for a testcase derived from the initial description:
> - added relev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99593
--- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> Comment on attachment 50412 [details]
> proposed testcase
>
> Any reason not to replace
> __simd128_int32_t with int32x4_t ,
> __simd128_float32_t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96582
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99766
Bug ID: 99766
Summary: ICE: unable to generate reloads with SVE code
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99766
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99807
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99813
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.2.1
Summary|S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99766
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99808
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99037
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99822
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.2.1
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99822
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99822
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99820
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96974
--- Comment #13 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97349
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97349
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97349
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97405
Bug ID: 97405
Summary: ICE in get_or_alloc_expr_for in code hoisting with SVE
intrinsics
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-vali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97405
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.2
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97442
Bug ID: 97442
Summary: Wrong represenation of AArch64 saba in RTL
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97534
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-23
Stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97528
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97546
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97546
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Likely find_bswap_or_nop just needs to bail out if !cst_and_fits_in_hwi
(TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (gimple_expr_type (stmt)))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97546
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97546
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70210
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70210
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Viktor Engelmann from comment #5)
> Hmmm the problem isn't related to docker - I get the same problem when I run
> gcc on the raspberry directly with -mcpu=armv7l as autoconf does in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97904
Bug ID: 97904
Summary: ICE with AArch64 SVE intrinsics
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97904
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.2.1, 11.0
Target Miles
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97929
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97969
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97984
Bug ID: 97984
Summary: [10/11 Regression] Worse code for -O3 than -O2 on
aarch64 vector multiply-add
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97969
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97969
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Bisection shows it started with g:8d2d39587d941a40f25ea0144cceb677df115040
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97969
--- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Haoxin Tu from comment #7)
> (In reply to Paul Sokolovsky from comment #0)
>
> Hi, Paul. May I ask how to reduce compile-time-hog/memory-hog test cases
> using CReduce?
> I know CRe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98177
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-12-07
Ever confirm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98199
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-12-08
Stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98259
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98279
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98322
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98350
Bug ID: 98350
Summary: Reassociation breaks FMA chains
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96313
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ktkachov at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97150
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97323
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|kyry
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97150
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96313
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97349
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-09
Targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98448
Bug ID: 98448
Summary: [11 Regression] bootstrap-O3 comparison fails due to
libcody
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98453
Bug ID: 98453
Summary: aarch64: Missed opportunity for STP for vec_duplicate
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98477
Bug ID: 98477
Summary: aarch64: Unnecessary GPR -> FPR moves for conditional
select
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimizat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98477
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Or a =r,r,r alternative to the FCSEL pattern instead...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98448
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Indeed, I see it passing with today's trunk.
Nathan, if you can't reproduce it feel free to close this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96974
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98532
Bug ID: 98532
Summary: Use load/store pairs for 2-element vector in memory
permutes
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimizat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535
Bug ID: 98535
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in
operands_scanner::get_expr_operands(tree_node**, int)
building 538.imagick_r
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This backtrace started with my commit 64432b680eab0bddbe9a4ad4798457cf6a14ad60
but before this it still ICEd with:
foo.c: In function 'i':
foo.c:12:1: error: type mismatch in 'vec_perm_expr'
1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98581
Bug ID: 98581
Summary: unexpected reassociation for umin/umax ?
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98636
--- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #7)
> I think the error is correct.
> CCing Kyrill -- could you please confirm if the error is valid for
> above case ?
> Thanks!
Yes, -mfp16-format=alte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98641
Bug ID: 98641
Summary: Feature request: implement pointer alignment builtins
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98641
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The component is marked as C++, but it would be good to have these in C as
well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98657
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98681
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98268
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98268
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10 Regression] ICE:|[10/11 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98726
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.3.1
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98766
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.2.1
Summary|S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97172
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2020-09-23 00:00:00 |2021-1-22
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98791
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98792
Bug ID: 98792
Summary: Fail to use SHRN instructions for narrowing shift on
aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimizat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98766
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98766
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] SVE: ICE |[10 Regression] SVE: ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98849
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looks like after the refactoring to introduce MVE shifts (which doesn't ICE) we
need to make sure the optab is still disabled for iwmmxt?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98766
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98867
Bug ID: 98867
Summary: Failure to use SRI instruction for
shift-right-and-insert vector operations
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92665
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95265
Bug 95265 depends on bug 92665, which changed state.
Bug 92665 Summary: [AArch64] low lanes select not optimized out for vmlal
intrinsics
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92665
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98877
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91753
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97528
--- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
If the patch tests cleanly we should apply it to GCC 9 and 8 too (if
applicable)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98917
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98931
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|arm: Assembly fails with|[11 Regression] arm:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98949
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98974
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-02-05
Known to fa
1 - 100 of 371 matches
Mail list logo