--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 20:43
---
I have the patch for this working and will be submitting to the list for
approval soon.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24794
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-20 02:00
---
Patch submitted for review and approval. Christoph, thankyou for submitting
this PR and the example case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24794
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-23 02:02
---
Subject: Bug 24794
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Nov 23 02:02:31 2005
New Revision: 107394
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107394
Log:
2005-11-22 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-23 02:14
---
Subject: Bug 24794
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Nov 23 02:14:26 2005
New Revision: 107396
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107396
Log:
2005-11-22 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-23 02:28
---
Subject: Bug 24794
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Nov 23 02:28:44 2005
New Revision: 107397
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107397
Log:
2005-11-22 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-23 02:30
---
Subject: Bug 24794
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Nov 23 02:30:23 2005
New Revision: 107399
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107399
Log:
2005-11-22 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-23 20:57
---
Fixed in 4.1 and 4.2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24794
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-24 00:49
---
Fixed in 4.1 and 4.2, if someone has a dieing need for this in 4.0 let me know
and I will commit the fix there as well.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-24 07:21
---
This is not a bug. Gfortran is complying with F95 namelist read requirements.
This would be an enhancement or extension. The work around is to use correct
array triplets in the array qualifiers for namelist
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-24 17:25
---
After going to comp.lang.fortran I determined this is not a bug and gfortran is
correctly handling the given namelist. To get desired behavior use array
qualifiers with array triplet notation.
--
jvdelisle
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-25 19:44
---
I am reopening this PR because I recieved information that the behavior is a
pre F90 feature commonly used before array triplet notation was introduced. I
also found that it is supported in g77. So we
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-25 22:00
---
Confirmed on 4.2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-26 01:35
---
-fdump-tree-original: See below. What is this unprintable character? Is that
right?
MAIN__ ()
{
int4 i2;
int4 i1;
{
struct __st_parameter_dtquireY dt_parm.0;
dt_parm.0.common.filename
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-26 19:10
---
The problem with the test case is not related to the weird dump I am getting.
Notice I also have a 'Y' in there too as well as a '\b' character. This is
really weird.
I also noticed some
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-26 23:53
---
Please attach an actual example of the code so we can study it. This is
probably a duplicate of pr25039, but I need to see an example to confirm.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-27 00:34
---
Confirmed, we are deafaulting BLANK = to UNSPECIFIED rather than NULL as
required by F95 Standard.
Regression testing a patch now.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-28 00:23
---
Subject: Bug 25109
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Nov 28 00:23:28 2005
New Revision: 107588
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107588
Log:
2005-11-27 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-29 02:16
---
Reduced test case:
program test
dimension data(100)
read(11,end=1000 )data
1000 continue
backspace 11
backspace 11
end
I will have to check to see if this is
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-29 02:28
---
Yes, I have a patch under review right now that fixes this. However, I am
going to add a requirement that -std=legacy or similar be invoked, otherwise we
would be non-compliant with F95 Standard which disallows
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-29 03:50
---
Dang, I just noticed that Iwan had proposed a patch in comment #5 so I did my
own.
My apologies please.
Does Iwan have copyright assignment in place?
I took a different approach with my patch because I did
: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25149
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-29 05:53
---
Subject: Bug 25149
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Nov 29 05:52:57 2005
New Revision: 107655
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107655
Log:
2005-11-28 Steven G. Kargl <[EMAI
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 02:09
---
Subject: Bug 25109
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Nov 30 02:09:13 2005
New Revision: 107697
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107697
Log:
2005-11-29 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 02:53
---
Subject: Bug 25109
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Nov 30 02:53:18 2005
New Revision: 107699
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107699
Log:
2005-11-29 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-02 00:38
---
Subject: Bug 25149
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Dec 2 00:38:36 2005
New Revision: 107851
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107851
Log:
2005-12-01 Steven G. Kargl <[EMAI
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-02 02:13
---
Fixed in 4.1 and 4.2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25149
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-02 02:13
---
Closing
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-02 06:10
---
Fixed on 4.1 and 4.2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Failure - FM013.f at -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host t
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-04 23:11
---
We just had a discussion regarding another similar problem. The maintainers
need to come to some concensus on the behavior of some compiler flags such as
-std=f95 and -pedantic. Once that is settled then we
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-06 02:27
---
I see that g77 output differs from gfortran.
I also see gfortran and ifort agree 100%.
I am not sure which is right.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25271
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-06 03:21
---
I can confirm this behavior disagrees with ifort. I will investigate further.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 05:16
---
I have found the offending code. I am working on the fix.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25264
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-08 07:20
---
I am looking into this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24268
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-09 02:08
---
I see that ifort gives identical results to gfortran. I believe the correct
interpretation is that the read is expecting a list of data and when its not
there it ends the read. There are some compilers that
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-09 02:53
---
Subject: Bug 25039
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Dec 9 02:53:41 2005
New Revision: 108271
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108271
Log:
2005-12-08 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-09 02:57
---
Subject: Bug 25039
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Dec 9 02:57:13 2005
New Revision: 108272
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108272
Log:
2005-12-08 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-10 00:09
---
Not a bug.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-10 20:21
---
Where and how end of record or end of file is detected is very sensitive in
this code for internal IO. I am currently dredging on 25264 which also has
sensitivities. When you work at this long enough you
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-11 00:32
---
I have this beastie beat. The fix of the initial problem caused no less than
10 regressions (I estimate) and so I had to unmangle that. Talk about head
spinning.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-11 08:09
---
Patch submitted for approval.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25264
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-11 17:54
---
This is simialr to pr25264. I had to fix a regression in tl-editing, so maybe
i need to extend that to the regular files. I was beginning to wonder why
internal units seemed so different fromn files. Perhaps
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-16 09:04
---
Patch submitted for review and approval.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25349
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-16 09:05
---
Patch submitted for review and approval.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25264
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-16 19:32
---
Subject: Bug 25349
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Dec 16 19:32:21 2005
New Revision: 108671
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108671
Log:
2005-12-16 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-16 19:32
---
Subject: Bug 25264
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Dec 16 19:32:21 2005
New Revision: 108671
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108671
Log:
2005-12-16 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-16 19:40
---
Subject: Bug 25264
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Dec 16 19:40:36 2005
New Revision: 108673
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108673
Log:
2005-12-16 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-16 19:40
---
Subject: Bug 25349
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Dec 16 19:40:36 2005
New Revision: 108673
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108673
Log:
2005-12-16 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-16 20:37
---
Subject: Bug 25039
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Dec 16 20:37:28 2005
New Revision: 108676
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108676
Log:
2005-12-16 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-16 20:40
---
Subject: Bug 25039
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Dec 16 20:40:13 2005
New Revision: 108677
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108677
Log:
2005-12-16 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-16 23:44
---
Subject: Bug 24268
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Dec 16 23:44:14 2005
New Revision: 108695
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108695
Log:
2005-12-16 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-16 23:49
---
Subject: Bug 24268
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Dec 16 23:49:33 2005
New Revision: 108696
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108696
Log:
2005-12-16 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-17 21:33
---
This simple patch appears to fix this: The stement moved needs to be executed
before the return is called.
===
*** io/transfer.c (revision
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-17 21:40
---
I have figured this out. It is similar to the recent tl_editing problems with
next_record_w. next_char is not handling the special cases for internal units.
I am working up a patch now.
--
jvdelisle at gcc
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-18 08:24
---
Subject: Bug 25264
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Dec 18 08:24:04 2005
New Revision: 108744
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108744
Log:
2005-12-17 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-18 08:24
---
Subject: Bug 25349
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Dec 18 08:24:04 2005
New Revision: 108744
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108744
Log:
2005-12-17 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-18 08:32
---
Subject: Bug 25264
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Dec 18 08:32:09 2005
New Revision: 108745
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108745
Log:
2005-12-17 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-18 08:32
---
Subject: Bug 25349
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Dec 18 08:32:09 2005
New Revision: 108745
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108745
Log:
2005-12-17 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-19 06:52
---
Subject: Bug 25463
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Dec 19 06:52:33 2005
New Revision: 108784
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108784
Log:
2005-12-18 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-19 07:02
---
Subject: Bug 25463
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Dec 19 07:02:05 2005
New Revision: 108785
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108785
Log:
2005-12-18 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-19 07:03
---
Commited to 4.2 Will commit to 4.1 in ~24 hours.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25463
--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-19 07:20
---
Fixed in 4.1 and 4.2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-19 07:22
---
Fixed in 4.1 and 4,2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-19 07:23
---
Fixed in 4.1 and 4.2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-19 07:25
---
Fixed in 4.0, not a bug in 4.1 and 4.2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-20 00:50
---
My apologies, I was looking at the wrong place.
Grigory, thanks for test case.
I have regression tested the patch and see no new failures. There are some
NIST failures, but these are not affected by the patch
--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-20 05:06
---
Evidently I do not have authorization to commit to the 4.0 branch. (I tried
twice) Here is a completed and ready testcase. I strongly suggest people move
on to 4.1 if at all possible. If someone else wants to
--- Comment #16 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-20 06:06
---
Subject: Bug 25305
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Dec 20 06:06:28 2005
New Revision: 108844
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108844
Log:
2005-12-20 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #17 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-20 06:12
---
Subject: Bug 25305
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Dec 20 06:12:53 2005
New Revision: 108845
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108845
Log:
2005-12-20 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #18 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-20 06:19
---
Fixed 4.0 only. Not a bug in 4.1 or 4.2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-21 04:50
---
Subject: Bug 25463
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Dec 21 04:50:19 2005
New Revision: 108896
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108896
Log:
2005-12-20 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-21 05:09
---
Subject: Bug 25463
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Dec 21 05:08:53 2005
New Revision: 108897
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108897
Log:
2005-12-20 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
NCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25510
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-21 05:58
---
Possible places to check. If the error is on actual file IO will leave it as
is:
io/file_pos.c: generate_error (&fpp->common, ERROR_OS, NULL);
io/file_pos.c: generate_error (&fpp->common, ERROR
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-21 06:51
---
Subject: Bug 24268
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Dec 21 06:51:02 2005
New Revision: 108899
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108899
Log:
2005-12-20 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-21 06:52
---
Subject: Bug 24268
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Dec 21 06:52:38 2005
New Revision: 108900
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108900
Log:
2005-12-20 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-21 06:56
---
This is now fixed for the specific test case. 4.1 and 4.2 are in sync. I plan
to go back and review for other possible cases of whitespace. Just want to
keep this synchronized.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #18 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-22 01:18
---
This is great! I have regression tested and NIST tested on i686 and all pass.
I have not tried some of the problem cases yet, but will do later tonight.
I was just getting ready to start working on this one
--- Comment #19 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-22 02:08
---
Ran some test cases. The second example in Comment #3 fails. With or without
FX patch given in Comment #6
At line 10 of file back3.f
Fortran runtime error: Read past ENDFILE record
Dale, are you getting this
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-22 02:32
---
Subject: Bug 25307
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Dec 22 02:32:29 2005
New Revision: 108938
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108938
Log:
2005-12-21 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #25 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-22 17:59
---
The failure in the second example in comment #3 is that the reading past the
record is not being caught by the end specifier in the read statement. It
should go to 1011 and continue. This is a different bug
--- Comment #28 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-22 22:49
---
On i686-pc-linux-gnu:
$ cat back3.f
integer dat(5)
dat = (/ 0, 0, 0, 0, 1 /)
write(11) dat,dat,dat,dat
rewind 11
write(11) dat
read(11,end=1008) dat
call abort()
1008
--- Comment #29 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-22 23:03
---
Dale, do you have copyright assignment and/or commit priviliges? Also, I have
gone to comp.lang.fortran for an interpretation on my comment #28. I see what
you are saying and I see what ifort is doing. Ifort
--- Comment #30 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-23 00:21
---
Based on feedback on comp.lang.fortran, the code in #28 is illegal and so the
behavior is acceptable and probably appropriate. Based on this I believe we
have a working solution to this bug. We just need to
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-23 02:02
---
Subject: Bug 25307
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Dec 23 02:02:52 2005
New Revision: 109002
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109002
Log:
2005-12-22 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-23 02:56
---
Subject: Bug 25307
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Dec 23 02:56:34 2005
New Revision: 109003
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109003
Log:
2005-12-22 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-23 02:59
---
Subject: Bug 25307
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Dec 23 02:59:37 2005
New Revision: 109005
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109005
Log:
2005-12-22 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-23 05:54
---
Fixed on 4.1 and 4.2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-23 05:57
---
Fixed on 4.1 and 4.2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #32 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-23 20:21
---
Yes, I will work this up with a proper test case and submit for approval.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25139
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 06:00
---
I have a fix for this already. Patch for submottal soon.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 04:00
---
I have a fix for this. Will submit shortly.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 06:59
---
Subject: Bug 25419
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Dec 28 06:59:35 2005
New Revision: 109099
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109099
Log:
2005-12-28 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 07:00
---
Subject: Bug 25419
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Dec 28 07:00:47 2005
New Revision: 109100
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109100
Log:
2005-12-28 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 07:20
---
Subject: Bug 25550
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Dec 28 07:20:19 2005
New Revision: 109101
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109101
Log:
2005-12-28 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 07:21
---
Subject: Bug 25550
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Dec 28 07:21:20 2005
New Revision: 109102
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109102
Log:
2005-12-28 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25587
--- Comment #33 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 20:58
---
Subject: Bug 25139
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Dec 28 20:58:08 2005
New Revision: 109122
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109122
Log:
2005-12-28 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 20:58
---
Subject: Bug 25510
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Dec 28 20:58:08 2005
New Revision: 109122
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109122
Log:
2005-12-28 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #34 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 21:12
---
Subject: Bug 25139
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Dec 28 21:12:52 2005
New Revision: 109123
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109123
Log:
2005-12-28 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
401 - 500 of 3058 matches
Mail list logo
