------- Comment #25 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-22 17:59 ------- The failure in the second example in comment #3 is that the reading past the record is not being caught by the end specifier in the read statement. It should go to 1011 and continue. This is a different bug. I will try to hunt this down this weekend unless Dale does. Let me know off bugzilla.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25139
