--- Comment #7 from joel at oarcorp dot com 2007-05-06 17:00 ---
It is definitely a regression against 4.1.2. It is probably a regession
against 4.0. We have been compiling this code with the same compile options
since September 2006 using the latest gcc releases possible
ummary: Binding for pthread_sigmask not same as other ports
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: joel at oarco
--- Comment #1 from joel at oarcorp dot com 2007-07-05 18:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=13853)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13853&action=view)
Patch to make this file compile
With this patch, I have been able to successfully compile GNAT for 7
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2005-08-19 16:02
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE with soft-float on
m68k
Why did you turn this from m68k-* to m68k-rtems?
It was reported against m68k-rtems but would have
be duplicated on at least m68k-elf if not any
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2005-05-16 14:00
---
Subject: Re: Segfault while compiling
libgfortran/intrinsics/selected_int_kind.f90
corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-14
>
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2005-05-18 13:23
---
Subject: Re: Cross-building gnat-4.0.0 requires native gnat-4.0.0
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18
> 07:43 ---
&
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2005-01-28 12:24
---
Subject: Re: LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC doesn't play nice
with RTEMS
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-28
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2005-01-31 15:23
---
Subject: Re: gnat tools not buildable cross
neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-29
> 22:19 ---
>
>>You m
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2005-01-31 15:24
---
Subject: Re: gnat tools not buildable cross
charlet at adacore dot com wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From charlet at adacore dot com 2005-01-31 09:21
> ---
> Subject: Re: gnat tools not
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2005-02-01 00:46
---
Subject: Re: gnat tools not buildable cross
charlet at adacore dot com wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From charlet at adacore dot com 2005-01-31 16:38
> ---
> Subject: Re: gnat tools not
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2005-02-03 12:24
---
Subject: Re: gnat tools not buildable cross
neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-03
> 00:57 ---
> Joel, I'm suspi
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2005-02-07 22:41
---
Subject: Re: gnat tools not buildable cross
laurent at guerby dot net wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-02-06 10:02
> ---
> (In reply to comment #19)
>
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2005-02-08 00:01
---
Subject: Re: gnat tools not buildable cross
neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-07
> 23:15 ---
> Closing. Laurent, I ma
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2005-02-08 19:16
---
Subject: Re: gnat tools not buildable cross
neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-08
> 18:30 ---
>
>>Is a fix lik
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2005-02-09 12:44
---
Subject: Re: gnat tools not buildable cross
neroden at twcny dot rr dot com wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From neroden at twcny dot rr dot com 2005-02-09
> 07:13 ---
> Subject: Re: gnat
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2004-11-03 21:09 ---
Subject: Re: M68060 fails with libstdc++-v3/config/cpu/m68k/atomicity.h
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-03 00:12
> ---
>
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2004-11-03 22:56 ---
Subject: Re: M68060 fails with libstdc++-v3/config/cpu/m68k/atomicity.h
schwab at suse dot de wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2004-11-03 22:25 ---
> On the m68k the b
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2004-11-03 23:25 ---
Subject: Re: M68060 fails with libstdc++-v3/config/cpu/m68k/atomicity.h
cjohns at cybertec dot com dot au wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From cjohns at cybertec dot com dot au 2004-11-03 23
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2004-11-04 14:56 ---
Subject: Re: M68060 fails with libstdc++-v3/config/cpu/m68k/atomicity.h
schwab at suse dot de wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2004-11-03 23:44 ---
> Even the 68020
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2004-11-04 16:37 ---
Subject: Re: M68060 fails with libstdc++-v3/config/cpu/m68k/atomicity.h
schwab at suse dot de wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2004-11-04 15:12 ---
> My copy of the 6806
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2004-11-04 19:11 ---
Subject: Re: M68060 fails with libstdc++-v3/config/cpu/m68k/atomicity.h
schwab at suse dot de wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2004-11-04 16:53 ---
> You can't ju
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2004-11-18 14:13
---
Subject: Re: [3.4 only] ICE: output_operand: invalid expression
as operand
corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-18
>
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2004-11-18 14:26
---
Subject: Re: [3.4 only] ICE: output_operand: invalid expression
as operand
corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-18
>
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2004-11-24 15:50
---
Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] fixincludes breaks RTEMS
corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-24
> 15:02 ---
> (In
24 matches
Mail list logo
