------- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2005-01-31 15:23 ------- Subject: Re: gnat tools not buildable cross
neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-29 > 22:19 ------- > >>You may try adding a gnattools directory, whose makefile and configury is > > based > >>on libada's, but which is a host module rather than a target module. > > > Correct (dammit). :-) > > I've already done this on the libada-gnattools-branch, > but I've also done some other things there, which wouldn't be suitable for > stage 3. Please try a snapshot of the libada-gnattools-branch from... hmm, > let's see... December 1, 2004. Where are these snapshots? Or exactly how do you want it checked out from CVS. > If it works correctly (and I know it works correctly for native tools), > it's safe enough to merge to mainline even in stage 3. I would have done so > already, but without a bug report, it wasn't stage-3-suitable. There is now a bug report against 4.x and there was at least a lot of whining for 3.3 and 3.4. :) > If it doesn't, come back to me; I expect that there's some incremental change > on top of it which should sort out any remaining problems. Great. Point me in the right direction and I will be happy to test. --joel -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19489
