[Bug web/119227] Does the generated HTML for cobol get installed to the website?

2025-03-24 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119227 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug cobol/119414] cobol driver unconditionally adds platform-specific command line options.

2025-03-24 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119414 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug web/119227] Does the generated HTML for cobol get installed to the website?

2025-03-26 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119227 --- Comment #14 from James K. Lowden --- (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #13) > (In reply to James K. Lowden from comment #12) > > The inability to create a PDF from groff suggests an old version is > > installed. The PDF driver was int

[Bug cobol/119302] cobol.3 manpage is installed without program_transform_name

2025-04-12 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119302 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug cobol/119769] FE: GnuCOBOL extension BINARY-C-LONG missing

2025-05-07 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119769 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug cobol/119337] cobol: gcobc wrapper should deduce output name

2025-05-09 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119337 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug cobol/119335] cobol frontend ignores -M

2025-05-09 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119335 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug cobol/119335] cobol frontend ignores -M

2025-05-10 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119335 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug cobol/119632] section segments (cobol85) not implemented, "ignored" -> raising compile error

2025-05-10 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119632 --- Comment #6 from James K. Lowden --- Taking a cue from Iain, the output is now: $ gcobol OB/OBIC2A.cbl OB/OBIC2A.cbl:131:24: warning: SECTION segment ‘30. ’ was ignored 131 | 013000 SECT-IC219-

[Bug cobol/119769] FE: GnuCOBOL extension BINARY-C-LONG missing

2025-05-10 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119769 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug cobol/119331] cobol: unimplemented exceptions abort compilation - even if requested to NOT use them

2025-07-07 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119331 --- Comment #3 from James K. Lowden --- This patch awaits work on the command-line interface for warnings and options. As of now, ECs can be turns on and off via CDF, but can be enabled only via the command-line. That puts the compiler in compl

[Bug cobol/120730] parse.cc doesn't compile with bison 3.5.1

2025-07-07 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120730 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug cobol/120621] COBOL isn't built with STRICT_WARN

2025-07-07 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621 --- Comment #11 from James K. Lowden --- I would like to close this issue or fix what remains. It was reopened because it broke the bootstrap build, a lesson sorely learned. With the commit of June 20, that's been fixed. As of today, using a

[Bug cobol/119636] compile error: gcobol1 does not find file descriptions in case of obsolete FD phrases

2025-07-11 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119636 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from James K.

[Bug cobol/119636] compile error: gcobol1 does not find file descriptions in case of obsolete FD phrases

2025-07-11 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119636 --- Comment #7 from James K. Lowden --- To be clear, ISO is unambiguous. 13.4.5.3 Syntax rules ALL FORMATS 1) File-name-1 shall be specified in a file control entry. With that requirement, tbug.cbl:5:11: error: file name not found is prett

[Bug cobol/120772] gcobc requires explicit -fPIC

2025-07-11 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120772 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug cobol/120621] COBOL isn't built with STRICT_WARN

2025-07-10 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621 --- Comment #13 from James K. Lowden --- Please apply https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-June/687385.html, and thank you for the work.

[Bug cobol/120779] HIGH-VALUE / LOW-VALUE not found

2025-07-10 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120779 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug cobol/120767] cdf-includes: needs to work in any source format (use of floating comment indicators

2025-07-10 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120767 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org Ever

[Bug cobol/120787] FR: EXHIBIT + EXHIBIT named support

2025-07-10 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120787 --- Comment #3 from James K. Lowden --- This takes me back. According to the MF documentation, EXHIBIT appeared around the time of Comet Kohoutek. "These features are extensions to ANS X3.23-1974 that appear in IBM OS/VS COBOL." Exciting ti

[Bug cobol/120998] [16 regression] unable to bootstrap with cobol and without --disable-werror

2025-07-10 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120998 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org Ever

[Bug cobol/120554] libgcobol meets clang

2025-07-10 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120554 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug cobol/119331] cobol: unimplemented exceptions abort compilation - even if requested to NOT use them

2025-07-11 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119331 --- Comment #5 from James K. Lowden --- Yes. One way to look at is to pretend there is no command-line option regarding ECs. The CDF behaves as required; it is up to the COBOL text to use it. :-) Under consideration: A CDF-directive comman

[Bug cobol/120791] FR: support for MOVEing pointer to pointer

2025-06-25 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120791 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug cobol/120771] CDF broken

2025-06-25 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120771 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gc

[Bug cobol/120787] FR: EXHIBIT + EXHIBIT named support

2025-06-25 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120787 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug cobol/120794] extra separator periods lead to syntax error

2025-06-25 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120794 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-06-25 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug cobol/120790] parser bug: ORGANIZATION IS RECORD SEQUENTIAL

2025-06-25 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120790 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-06-25 Status|UNCONFI

[Bug cobol/119337] cobol: gcobc wrapper should deduce output name

2025-07-01 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119337 --- Comment #6 from James K. Lowden --- Pending patch answers default output filename and default dialect: $ gcobcx=0 /usr/local/gcc-cobol/bin/gcobc -g failures/jkl/tbug2.cbl + exec /usr/local/gcc-cobol/bin/gcobol -shared -dialect mf -dialec

[Bug cobol/120765] gcobc broken shellscript

2025-07-01 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120765 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug cobol/119825] SIGSEGV when using qualified names

2025-05-15 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119825 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug cobol/119324] cppcheck meets /cobol/

2025-05-15 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119324 --- Comment #1 from James K. Lowden --- Partly fixed by 9b78ad2cbf0. 1. function eliminated: "Function parameter 'args'": 2. dts::regex_search emulates std::regex_search, which passes cm by reference, to write to it. 3. done: parameter 'name

[Bug cobol/119632] section segments (cobol85) not implemented, "ignored" -> raising compile error

2025-05-15 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119632 --- Comment #10 from James K. Lowden --- > But it should really do that - and allow it for _any_ other standard, not > only ibm. We don't want to let nonstandard syntax slip by unnoticed. IBM Linux COBOL allows SECTION segment numbers as sy

[Bug cobol/119217] cobol: build broken on non-linux by unguarded use of Linux-specific facilities.

2025-05-15 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119217 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug cobol/119632] section segments (cobol85) not implemented, "ignored" -> raising compile error

2025-05-15 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119632 --- Comment #8 from James K. Lowden --- > But it should really do that - and allow it for _any_ other standard, not > only ibm. We don't want to let nonstandard syntax slip by unnoticed. IBM Linux COBOL allows SECTION segment numbers as syn

[Bug cobol/119793] FR FE (parser): addition of BASED-STORAGE SECTION (Fujitsu)

2025-05-15 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119793 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug cobol/119810] FE: -include does not unset "included from"

2025-05-15 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119810 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug cobol/119809] FE internal_error internal compiler error: in digits_from_float128, at cobol/genapi.cc:15293 (bit data items)

2025-05-15 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119809 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug cobol/119520] cobol1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (use of field with unknown TYPEDEF)

2025-05-22 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119520 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug cobol/119461] record layout done in odd ways

2025-05-22 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119461 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug cobol/119232] gcobol -fdump-lang-all produces no dumps

2025-05-21 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119232 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug cobol/119221] RFE: fix-it hints for cobol syntax errors

2025-05-21 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119221 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug cobol/119454] gcobol: error: unrecognized command-line option ‘-save-temps’

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119454 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-23 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug cobol/119377] cobol.dg/group1/declarative_1.cob fails (segfaults, uninitialised vars)

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119377 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug cobol/119455] gcobol: needs optimization for direct assignments (don't call into runtime)

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119455 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Assignee|unassi

[Bug cobol/119364] building a cobol cross compiler on i686-linux-gnu targeting x86_64-linux-gnu fails

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119364 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org R

[Bug cobol/119324] cppcheck meets /cobol/

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119324 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug cobol/119323] cppcheck meets libgcobol

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119323 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org Last re

[Bug cobol/120401] gcobol allows arithmetic on alphanumeric fields

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120401 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gc

[Bug cobol/120402] gcobol does not check precedence of PIC characters

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120402 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug cobol/119935] libcobol fails to build on powerpc64-linux-gnu when explicitly enabled

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119935 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rdubner at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug cobol/120244] cobol.dg/cgroup2: more Valgrind issues in tests

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120244 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug cobol/119934] cobol builds on sparc64-linux-gnu with test failures

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119934 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rdubner at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug cobol/119933] cobol builds on loongarch64-linux-gnu with test failures

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119933 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug cobol/119932] cobol builds on s390x-linux-gnu with test failures

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119932 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug cobol/119975] clock_gettime in genapi.cc is unportable

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119975 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-23 Assignee|unassig

[Bug cobol/119896] Assertion failed: e->type == SymField, function cbl_field_of

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119896 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug cobol/119254] ICE on unterminated cobol string due to use of cbl_internal_error

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119254 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug cobol/120328] Building gcobol fails in non English systems

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120328 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug cobol/119887] runtime-switches are not documented / implemented (and don't pass NC211A and others)

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119887 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |SUSPENDED Assignee|unassign

[Bug cobol/119768] FE: parsing PIC N and NAT is broken

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119768 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug cobol/119793] FR FE (parser): addition of BASED-STORAGE SECTION (Fujitsu)

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119793 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |SUSPENDED

[Bug cobol/119639] runtime switches in SPECIAL NAMES not recognised (parser issue)

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119639 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug cobol/119887] runtime-switches are not documented / implemented (and don't pass NC211A and others)

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119887 --- Comment #3 from James K. Lowden --- *** Bug 119639 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug cobol/119805] FE: COMP-5 / COMP-X issues

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119805 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-23 Assignee|unassig

[Bug cobol/119633] compile error for debug-module USE FOR DEBUGGING

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119633 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigne

[Bug cobol/119597] SEGV on Cobol "hello world" on Power

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119597 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug cobol/119461] record layout done in odd ways

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119461 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug cobol/119215] -Wodr and -Wlto-type-mismatch issues in cobol

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119215 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug cobol/119634] compile error: sorry, unimplemented: Global declarative _DECLARATIVES_EVAL1

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119634 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Severity|normal

[Bug cobol/119638] WRITE FROM x BEFORE Y raises compile error (SQ207M)

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119638 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug cobol/119595] Port libgcobol to 32-bit architectures

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119595 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rdubner at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug cobol/119524] cobol: gg_printf assumes target characteristics

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119524 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug cobol/119455] gcobol: needs optimization for direct assignments (don't call into runtime)

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119455 --- Comment #4 from James K. Lowden --- *** Bug 119457 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug cobol/119217] cobol: build broken on non-linux by unguarded use of Linux-specific facilities.

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119217 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug cobol/119455] gcobol: needs optimization for direct assignments (don't call into runtime)

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119455 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug cobol/119211] [15/16 Regression] Cobol GCC 15 release checklist

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119211 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug cobol/119457] gcobol: big codegen for simple STRING plus malloc/free (and missing optimization)

2025-05-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119457 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug cobol/119231] gcobol -static produces a dynamically linked executable

2025-05-21 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119231 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug cobol/119221] RFE: fix-it hints for cobol syntax errors

2025-05-21 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119221 Bug 119221 depends on bug 119256, which changed state. Bug 119256 Summary: Capture source ranges for tokens in gcobol https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119256 What|Removed |Added

[Bug cobol/119332] cobol frontend does not support version dump options specified in --help

2025-05-21 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119332 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug cobol/119329] cobol frontend does not support -Wall

2025-05-21 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119329 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug cobol/119256] Capture source ranges for tokens in gcobol

2025-05-21 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119256 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug cobol/119335] cobol frontend ignores -M

2025-05-21 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119335 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug cobol/119336] cobol: missing copybooks break parser

2025-05-21 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119336 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Assignee|unassigne

[Bug cobol/120501] Error parsing ">>turn"

2025-06-02 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120501 --- Comment #1 from James K. Lowden --- fix pending in parser 3ac96109cd4.

[Bug cobol/119695] Incorrect diagnostic format specifiers in COBOL FE

2025-06-02 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119695 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #4 from James K.

[Bug cobol/119896] Assertion failed: e->type == SymField, function cbl_field_of

2025-06-15 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119896 --- Comment #5 from James K. Lowden --- > Good. I just saw that Robert's account is already set up. Yes. I've just completed my world tour with cppcheck, always an adventure. And I applied for my own cfarm account, because your bt was helpfu

[Bug cobol/119975] clock_gettime in genapi.cc is unportable

2025-06-18 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119975 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug cobol/119805] FE: COMP-5 / COMP-X issues

2025-06-18 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119805 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug cobol/120786] strange message for NOT=

2025-06-25 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120786 --- Comment #3 from James K. Lowden --- Thank you for testing with MF. > Just keep in mind that a , and ; are valid Not alone, of course. The 2-character sequence [,;][[:space:]] is valid as separator space. > if var NOT<=-var+ 9 DISPLAY "

[Bug cobol/120621] COBOL isn't built with STRICT_WARN

2025-06-16 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug cobol/120328] Building gcobol fails in non English systems

2025-06-16 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120328 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug cobol/119695] Incorrect diagnostic format specifiers in COBOL FE

2025-06-16 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119695 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug cobol/120554] libgcobol meets clang

2025-06-16 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120554 --- Comment #13 from James K. Lowden --- The code now reads, cbl_declarative_t& operator=(const cbl_declarative_t&) = default; Can I mark this PR as resolved?

[Bug cobol/119324] cppcheck meets /cobol/

2025-06-16 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119324 --- Comment #12 from James K. Lowden --- As of today, except for gcc/cobol/genapi.cc, I have only a couple dozen outstanding reports from cppcheck. One deserves attention at some point but is not causing a problem. Most are cppcheck failing to

[Bug cobol/119769] FE: GnuCOBOL extension BINARY-C-LONG missing

2025-06-16 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119769 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug cobol/119805] FE: COMP-5 / COMP-X issues

2025-06-16 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119805 --- Comment #4 from James K. Lowden --- Patch was applied. Please confirm it meets your expectations.

[Bug cobol/119324] cppcheck meets /cobol/

2025-06-09 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119324 --- Comment #11 from James K. Lowden --- I am adding gcc/cobol/Makefile.cppcheck to the repository. It uses the bear(1) package to build a "project" file, which I minimized to build only the files in the gcc/cobol directory. It then invokes cp

[Bug cobol/120769] cobol frontend - provide a way to undo -ffixed-form / -ffree-form

2025-06-23 Thread jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120769 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   >