at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93477
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
This seems to be fixed for 9.3/10.
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||10.0
Summary|[8/9/10 regression][C++11] |[8 regression][C++11]
|alignas for automatic |alignas for automatic
|variables with alignment|variables
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90333
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
Summary|[9/10 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71965
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 71965, which changed state.
Bug 71965 Summary: [8/9/10 Regression] [concepts] Substitution error *after*
failure to satisfy an earlier constraint
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71965
What|Rem
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Depends on||59231
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59231
[Bug 59231] [4.8/4.9 Regression] gcc misses [-Werror=sign-compare] when inside
a template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 92194, which changed state.
Bug 92194 Summary: [9/10 Regression] maybe-uninitialized false positive with
c++2a since r9-84-gcdc184174ce56df1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92194
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92194
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80635
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||malcolm.parsons at gmail dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80635
--- Comment #41 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #38)
> This is better:
Complete revised testcase:
#ifdef USE_STD
#include
using std::optional;
#else
using size_t = decltype(sizeof(1));
inline void *operator ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82521
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89129
Bug 89129 depends on bug 82521, which changed state.
Bug 82521 Summary: [8/9 Regression] No -Wtype-limits warning when using
templates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82521
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
--- Comment #80 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #77)
> So the "low hanging fruit" remaining is reshape_init_array copying the whole
> array even if not necessary.
>
> INTEGER_CSTs still account for most of the mem
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
One more C++20 feature, though this one is a DR against earlier versions as
well.
https://wg21.link/P1009R2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93529
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 47756
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47756&action=edit
initial WIP
This implements the simplest form, but not the string literal case or
parenthesized init.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93529
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
--- Comment #83 from Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86216
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994
Bug 16994 depends on bug 86216, which changed state.
Bug 86216 Summary: g++ ICE on valid code: verify_ssa failed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86216
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93530
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
See
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] ICE:|[8/9 Regression] ICE:
|Segmentation fault (in |Segmentation fault (in
|make_ssa_name_fn) with VLA |make_ssa_name_fn) with VLA
|cast, C
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66477
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 66477, which changed state.
Bug 66477 Summary: [constexpr] accepts-invalid with constexpr member call on
non-constant reference
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66477
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91953
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] G++ |[8/9 Regression] G++
|
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 81862, which changed state.
Bug 81862 Summary: [C++11][constexpr] Constructor Parenthesized Initialization
of Member Array Crash
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81862
What|Removed
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Yes, duplicate.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 86917 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86917
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dsanders11 at ucsbalum dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92812
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86917
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in |[8/9 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93442
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] lambda |[8/9 Regression] lambda in
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 92625, which changed state.
Bug 92625 Summary: [8/9/10 Regression] Internal compiler error accessing
element in static constexpr char array in template class using alias
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92625
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92625
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90966
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haoranni at terpmail dot
umd.edu
--- Co
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 66844, which changed state.
Bug 66844 Summary: [c++-concepts] Requires-expression parameter with void type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66844
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66844
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67070, which changed state.
Bug 67070 Summary: [concepts] Concept with negation and disjunction not checked
correctly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67070
What|Removed |Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67070
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67319, which changed state.
Bug 67319 Summary: Short-hand concepts for variadic member functions broken
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67319
What|Removed |Added
---
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
So, fixed in GCC 10.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67545, which changed state.
Bug 67545 Summary: [concepts] Failure to properly substitute template
parameters into requires-clause
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67545
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67545
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
So, fixed for GCC 10.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67654, which changed state.
Bug 67654 Summary: [concepts] ICE when using concepts in constexpr function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67654
What|Removed |Added
---
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed for GCC 10.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67658, which changed state.
Bug 67658 Summary: [concepts] invalid code with constrained concepts compiles
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67658
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67684, which changed state.
Bug 67684 Summary: [concepts] friend access not working with constrained
function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67684
What|Removed |Added
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
So, fixed for GCC 10.
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed for GCC 10.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67686, which changed state.
Bug 67686 Summary: [concepts] segfault in finish_call_expr function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67686
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67697, which changed state.
Bug 67697 Summary: [concepts] ICE when using non-constexpr in requires
expression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67697
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67697
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed for GCC 10 (in r278785).
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed for GCC 10.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67704, which changed state.
Bug 67704 Summary: [concepts] requirements not being applied to aliases
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67704
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67719, which changed state.
Bug 67719 Summary: [concepts] bug with concepts using logical or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67719
What|Removed |Added
--
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed for GCC 10.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67720, which changed state.
Bug 67720 Summary: [concepts] bug with recursive constrained function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67720
What|Removed |Added
-
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed for GCC10.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67727, which changed state.
Bug 67727 Summary: [concepts] parameterized constraint not being checked for
unused variables
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67727
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93551
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 93551, which changed state.
Bug 93551 Summary: [10 Regression] Call from templated function to constrained
constructor segfaults when attempting to narrow to bool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93551
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 92593, which changed state.
Bug 92593 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE with CTAD using undeclared constraint
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92593
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92593
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90951
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] error |[8/9 Regression] error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92003
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 47787
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47787&action=edit
proposed fix
The change in C++17 is that static constexpr data members are now implicitly
'inline', so no out-o
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93140
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] |[8/9 Regression] Segfault
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92003
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] |[8/9 Regression]
|cons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91212
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
I think this is a bug in pre-P1825R0 handling of the restriction that the first
overload resolution fails "if the type of the first parameter of the selected
constructor is not an rvalue reference to the obje
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91212
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 47793
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47793&action=edit
Fix
This patch fixes the pre-P1825 bug, but breaks the PR58051 test which is not
actually allowed by DR 1579 (b
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92517
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92654
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] |[8/9 Regression] internal
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93618
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93650
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2020-02-11
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92583
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] |[8/9 Regression] internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90691
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10 regression] |[9 regression]
|-Wsign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93093
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
This is https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/167
In CWG today we decided that since this is all compiler magic anyway, we can be
a bit more magical to get around this problematic interaction with con
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93643
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93713
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
401 - 500 of 8790 matches
Mail list logo
