http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50089
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50114
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49051
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-08-30
21:56:42 UTC ---
This will eventually be issue 1322,
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_active.html#1322
but the issues list hasn't been updated yet. In Bloomington we assigned it
pri
||2011-08-31
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Summary|[C++0x] tries to use|[C++0x] unnecessary
|variadic constructor when |instantiation of constexpr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50271
Bug #: 50271
Summary: [C++0x] G++ fails to handle combination of explicit
and deduced variadic template arguments
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50087
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-03
00:48:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I still think it's a missed optimization opportunity.
Yes, it definitely is. I'm just not sure whether it should be fixed by doing
constexpr expansion in n
||2011-09-04
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50248
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-05
04:33:14 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 5 04:33:08 2011
New Revision: 178518
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178518
Log:
PR c++/50248
Core 1358
* init.c (perfor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49458
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-05
04:33:54 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 5 04:33:48 2011
New Revision: 178520
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178520
Log:
PR c++/49267
PR c++/49458
DR 1328
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49267
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-05
04:34:01 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 5 04:33:57 2011
New Revision: 178521
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178521
Log:
PR c++/49267
* call.c (reference_binding):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49267
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-05
04:33:53 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 5 04:33:48 2011
New Revision: 178520
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178520
Log:
PR c++/49267
PR c++/49458
DR 1328
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49267
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-05
15:44:06 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 5 15:43:58 2011
New Revision: 178552
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178552
Log:
PR c++/49267
* call.c (compare_ics): rvalue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49267
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49458
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50296
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-06
18:09:07 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 6 18:09:01 2011
New Revision: 178604
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178604
Log:
PR c++/50296
* semantics.c (register_conste
redhat dot com |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-06
18:09:52 UTC ---
Should be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48320
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50248
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
||2011-09-07
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50298
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-07
17:11:56 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Sep 7 17:11:49 2011
New Revision: 178652
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178652
Log:
PR c++/50298
* parser.c (cp_parser_member_d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50298
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47765
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47765
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-08
18:50:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> In fact I expected that there is some implementation freedom which allows this
> (I was thinking of 14.7.1 p6), but I still wonder: I have always understood
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47765
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-08
19:22:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> But another reasonable interpretation would be to skip the parameter
> during deduction and then let normal overload resolution check for the
> conversion; i
at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50361
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-15
14:33:29 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 15 14:33:24 2011
New Revision: 178882
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178882
Log:
PR c++/50361
* expr.c (count_type_elements)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50365
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-15
14:33:42 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 15 14:33:37 2011
New Revision: 178883
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178883
Log:
PR c++/50365
* parser.c (cp_parser_late_ret
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50365
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50361
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50424
Bug #: 50424
Summary: G++ doesn't notice possible throw from default
argument
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
K
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50424
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-16
21:13:47 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Sep 16 21:13:42 2011
New Revision: 178917
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178917
Log:
PR c++/50424
* tree.c (bot_manip): Set cp_f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50424
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-16
21:16:19 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Sep 16 21:16:16 2011
New Revision: 178918
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178918
Log:
PR c++/50424
* call.c (set_flags_from_calle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50424
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed||2011-09-17
Version|4.6.1 |4.6.2
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Summary
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50442
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-17
22:35:15 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Sep 17 22:35:10 2011
New Revision: 178932
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178932
Log:
PR c++/50442
Revert:
PR c++/49267
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49267
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.7.0
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49267
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-17
22:35:15 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Sep 17 22:35:10 2011
New Revision: 178932
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178932
Log:
PR c++/50442
Revert:
PR c++/49267
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50442
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50454
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50442
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-20
19:25:36 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 20 19:25:32 2011
New Revision: 179015
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179015
Log:
PR c++/50442
* g++.dg/overload/ref-conv1.C:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47436
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-22
22:05:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I'm reading 14.6/8 and I tend to agree with Jon that not mentioning A would
> be probably less misleading. However, I'm afraid we have the recurring problem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50258
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-23
13:07:33 UTC ---
permerror sounds good to me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50495
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50495
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-23
16:00:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I recently made a number of improvements that will be in 4.7.0; see PR 48481.
The fn_set change in particular should cut your overload resolution time by
50
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42844
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-23
21:30:52 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Sep 23 21:30:48 2011
New Revision: 179130
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179130
Log:
Core 234 - allow const objects with no initial
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20039
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-23
21:30:52 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Sep 23 21:30:48 2011
New Revision: 179130
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179130
Log:
Core 234 - allow const objects with no initiali
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48562
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44267
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-23
22:50:50 UTC ---
Looks like we need to pass complain down into build_base_path.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50500
Bug #: 50500
Summary: [C++0x] [DR 1082] move constructor should cause copy
constructor to be deleted, but still declared
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42844
--- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-25
20:29:09 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Sep 25 20:29:04 2011
New Revision: 179170
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179170
Log:
Core 234 - allow const objects with no initial
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20039
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-25
20:29:09 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Sep 25 20:29:04 2011
New Revision: 179170
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179170
Log:
Core 234 - allow const objects with no initiali
at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-26
14:42:39 UTC ---
Reduced:
template
struct A
{
A();
A(const A&);
A(const T&);
operator T&() const;
operator const T&() const;
};
in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50523
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-26
15:47:27 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 26 15:47:17 2011
New Revision: 179203
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179203
Log:
PR c++/50523
* call.c (implicit_conversion)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50523
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41995
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29131
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||phresnel at gmail dot com
--- Comment #19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50512
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-26
17:55:12 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 26 17:55:04 2011
New Revision: 179208
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179208
Log:
PR c++/50512
* call.c (compare_ics): Only c
||FIXED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-26
18:10:25 UTC ---
Fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45487
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-26
18:12:01 UTC ---
I'm open to this change.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46105
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-26
18:24:36 UTC ---
It looks the same to me.
||2011-09-26
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-26
18:29:15 UTC ---
Makes sense to me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49637
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50508
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-27
02:12:46 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 27 02:12:42 2011
New Revision: 179228
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179228
Log:
PR c++/50508
* semantics.c (cxx_eval_logica
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45102
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-27
02:13:06 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 27 02:13:00 2011
New Revision: 179230
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179230
Log:
PR c++/45102
* pt.c (tsubst_copy_and_build)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46105
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-27
02:12:55 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 27 02:12:51 2011
New Revision: 179229
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179229
Log:
PR c++/46105
* typeck.c (structural_comptyp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46105
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-27
02:19:09 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 27 02:19:05 2011
New Revision: 179232
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179232
Log:
PR c++/46105
* typeck.c (structural_compty
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50508
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-27
02:19:00 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 27 02:18:56 2011
New Revision: 179231
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179231
Log:
PR c++/50508
* semantics.c (cxx_eval_logica
gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.2
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-27
02:21:53 UTC ---
Fixed.
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Known to fail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50508
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27527
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41725
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35722
--- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-02
21:45:08 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Oct 2 21:45:01 2011
New Revision: 179436
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179436
Log:
PR c++/35722
Implement N2555 (expanding pa
||FIXED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-02
21:53:23 UTC ---
Fixed for 4.7.
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-03
00:26:27 UTC ---
Fixed by the patch for bug 35722.
||2011-10-03
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50594
--- Comment #20 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-04
18:37:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> could you just amend that implicit declaration to include the visibility
> attribute?
Certainly. They're declared in cxx_init_decl_processing:
pus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39164
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-06
19:57:06 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Oct 6 19:56:53 2011
New Revision: 179634
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179634
Log:
PR c++/39164
* decl.c (grokfndecl): Diagnos
||2011-10-09
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-09
21:06:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Right
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27692
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-11
01:10:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I honestly don't understand how such a warning would look like: like warning
> for any snippet of code where destructors could run in an unpredictable order?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27692
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-11
13:08:19 UTC ---
Namespace-scope objects aren't the problem; we've always handled them fine.
The problem is with function-local statics, which aren't constructed until the
function is called, so we c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27692
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-11
14:38:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> what I'm suggesting is building the list of destructors dynamically for
> executables and shared libraries.
That sounds a lot like __cxa_atexit.
at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49855
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-11
17:53:19 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Oct 11 17:53:07 2011
New Revision: 179813
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179813
Log:
PR c++/49855
PR c++/49896
* cp-tree.def
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49896
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-11
17:53:20 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Oct 11 17:53:07 2011
New Revision: 179813
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179813
Log:
PR c++/49855
PR c++/49896
* cp-tree.def
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49896
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-11
18:18:35 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Oct 11 18:18:25 2011
New Revision: 179815
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179815
Log:
PR c++/49855
PR c++/49896
* call.c (pe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49855
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-11
18:18:35 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Oct 11 18:18:25 2011
New Revision: 179815
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179815
Log:
PR c++/49855
PR c++/49896
* call.c (per
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49855
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49896
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49216
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50458
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49216
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||z0sh at sogetthis dot com
--- Comment #8
at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49216
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-11
19:50:55 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Oct 11 19:50:49 2011
New Revision: 179819
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179819
Log:
PR c++/49216
* init.c (build_vec_init): Avo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49216
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38174
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-13
02:49:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> So, for operator== for example, we reach the end of add_builtin_candidate, the
> conditional is true, and we proceed with two calls to build_builtin_candidat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50618
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-13
18:01:58 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Oct 13 18:01:51 2011
New Revision: 179934
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179934
Log:
PR c++/50618
* init.c (expand_aggr_init_1):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50618
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-13
18:02:15 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Oct 13 18:02:10 2011
New Revision: 179935
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179935
Log:
PR c++/50618
* init.c (expand_aggr_init_1):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50618
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-13
18:03:13 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Oct 13 18:03:06 2011
New Revision: 179938
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179938
Log:
PR c++/50618
* init.c (expand_aggr_init_1):
1201 - 1300 of 8296 matches
Mail list logo
