http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47436
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-09-22 22:05:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > I'm reading 14.6/8 and I tend to agree with Jon that not mentioning A<T> would > be probably less misleading. However, I'm afraid we have the recurring problem > that, missing caret diagnostics, we want to name something. You don't need to name something to give a source location, just use error_at. > Let's see if Jason has an opinion, maybe for now we want to just live with the > current error message... I think the current message is clear enough. Only people writing compiler tests are ever going to hit it.
