--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-27 21:10 ---
> Actual, I have the feeling the attr.proc_pointer is not saved at all in
> module.c, cf. ab_attribute in that file.
Exactly. Thanks for pointing this out. The following patch fixes it:
Index: gcc/fortran/mo
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-28 11:24 ---
> One should check whether other attributes are also missing.
attr.procedure is missing as well. I'll provide an extended patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37253
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-28 15:12 ---
Subject: Bug 37253
Author: janus
Date: Thu Aug 28 15:10:50 2008
New Revision: 139713
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139713
Log:
2008-08-28 Janus Weil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-28 15:13 ---
Fixed in r139713. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
sion] -Wunused-variable broken
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gn
Summary: alignment of data in COMMON blocks
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janus at gcc dot gn
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-22 11:46 ---
Subject: Bug 37486
Author: janus
Date: Mon Sep 22 11:45:02 2008
New Revision: 140546
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140546
Log:
2008-09-22 Janus Weil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-22 11:50 ---
Fixed with r140546. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-22 16:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=16381)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16381&action=view)
patch
The attached patch is as far as I got with this up to now. It regtests fine and
makes the fo
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-23 12:44 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> How about the following patch?
Looks very good, and does what it should. Just one thing: We will also have to
check for attr.in_common, so that normal procptrs don't get m
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-29 09:40 ---
Updated patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-09/msg00447.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36592
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-20 08:09 ---
Actually I don't understand this ifort error message. I had a look in the
standard, but couldn't find anything which would render the IMPORT statement
invalid.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot o
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-20 12:02 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 36463 ***
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-20 12:02 ---
*** Bug 35971 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-20 09:19 ---
I think ifort 10.1 does neither support ABSTRACT interfaces, nor PROCEDURE
statements (therefore it cannot compile this test case). But there is a 11.0
beta which does support both, and which gives the error Tobias
gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37926
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-01 13:25 ---
Subject: Bug 36463
Author: janus
Date: Sat Nov 1 13:24:03 2008
New Revision: 141515
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141515
Log:
2008-11-01 Janus Weil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-01 13:25 ---
Subject: Bug 36322
Author: janus
Date: Sat Nov 1 13:24:03 2008
New Revision: 141515
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141515
Log:
2008-11-01 Janus Weil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-01 13:33 ---
Rev. 141515 does not fix the complete test case on c.l.f., but most of the
troubles it made, including comment #8. Still I'm closing this PR, because
PR36463 is about the same c.l.f. code, and will be kept op
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-01 13:52 ---
r141515 eliminates the ICE in comment #2 and the c.l.f. example, so I guess
this can not be called a regression any more. Removing the [4.4 Regression]
tag.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-01 14:06 ---
To clarify the situation regarding the code on c.l.f.: The link in comment #0
points to a thread which contains two example programs. One is called "fptr"
and uses Cray pointers, the other one is called
--- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-01 14:20 ---
Here is a maximally reduced (and slightly modified) version of comment #12,
which gives the same error:
module other_fun
abstract interface
function abstract_fun(x)
integer x
integer
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-01 14:43 ---
I'm not completely convinced yet that the code in comment #0 is valid. While
g95 accepts it, ifort 11.0 beta says:
c0.f90(4): error #6362: The data types of the argument(s) are invalid. [LEN]
character(len=
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-01 14:49 ---
Here is a modified version of comment #0:
abstract interface
function foo(x)
character(len=*) :: x
character(len=len(x)) :: foo
end function foo
end interface
character(len=20) :: str
procedure(foo) :: bar
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-01 14:58 ---
A variant of comment #3 which gives a different error:
abstract interface
function foo(x,y)
character(len=*) :: x
integer y(:)
character(len=size(y)) :: foo
end function foo
end interface
character(len
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-01 15:03 ---
For both comment #3 and comment #4 the errors disappear if the PROCEDURE
statement is removed and instead the interface is made non-abstract.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36426
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-01 19:06 ---
The following patch fixes comment #3 and comment #4:
Index: gcc/fortran/expr.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/expr.c (revision 141520)
+++ gcc/fortran/expr.c
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-01 21:19 ---
On a related note: The following snippet from PR36426 produces an ICE.
function foo(x)
character(len=len(x)) :: foo,x
end function foo
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35040
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-01 21:57 ---
Subject: Bug 36426
Author: janus
Date: Sat Nov 1 21:56:27 2008
New Revision: 141522
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141522
Log:
2008-11-01 Janus Weil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-01 22:00 ---
Fixed with r141522. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-01 22:42 ---
This is really funny. If I compile a file which contains exactly the three
lines given in comment #0 (and nothing else), I get some errors, but no ICE.
However, if I add at least two blank lines (no matter where
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39230
dBy: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39314
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-26 15:45 ---
Sorry, forgot to specify the target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-26 19:22 ---
Also on i386-apple-darwin9.6.0 the FPEs are thrown correctly.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39314
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-27 09:01 ---
On x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu I *do* get the ICE when I compile with -ffast-math
-mfpmath=387. Cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-11/msg00250.html.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39314
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-27 09:13 ---
Note that the problem also appears for log, while it does not for acosh and
atanh:
real :: x = -5.0
! FPE is not thrown
print *, log(x)
print *, log10(x)
print *, acos(x)
print *, asin(x)
! FPE is thrown
!print
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-27 13:15 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> If it works with some but not all libm routines, it sounds more like a GLIBC
> than like a GCC problem.
Can someone reproduce this with C code?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bu
erity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39414
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-11 16:19 ---
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-03/msg00028.html
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-11 16:23 ---
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-12/msg00191.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38290
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-11 16:26 ---
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-03/msg00044.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36704
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-03 18:29 ---
Draft patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-04/msg00013.html.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-06 08:33 ---
Subject: Bug 39414
Author: janus
Date: Mon Apr 6 08:33:31 2009
New Revision: 145583
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145583
Log:
2009-04-06 Janus Weil
PR fortr
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-06 08:36 ---
Committed as r145583. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-07 07:25 ---
Subject: Bug 38920
Author: janus
Date: Tue Apr 7 07:24:37 2009
New Revision: 145651
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145651
Log:
2009-04-07 Janus Weil
PR fortr
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-07 07:32 ---
Fixed with r145651 (I messed up the PR number in the ChangeLog entry, though).
Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-07 07:34 ---
Oops. The commit in comment #9 was actually for PR38290, but I accidentally
messed up the PR number in the ChangeLog. Sorry for the noise.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38920
--- Comment #15 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-07 11:40 ---
Reopening.
proc_decl_13.f90 produces a segfault when compiled with "-g".
Backtrace:
#0 0x00f4bee1 in htab_hash_string (p=0x0) at
/home/jweil/gcc45/trunk/libiberty/hashtab.c:812
#1 0x0
--- Comment #16 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-07 11:43 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> proc_decl_13.f90 produces a segfault when compiled with "-g".
Sorry. Of course I'm talking about proc_ptr_13.f90.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38152
--- Comment #18 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-07 12:41 ---
Patch:
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c(Revision 145652)
+++ gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1015,10
--- Comment #19 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-07 16:24 ---
Subject: Bug 38152
Author: janus
Date: Tue Apr 7 16:24:31 2009
New Revision: 145692
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145692
Log:
2009-04-07 Janus Weil
PR fortr
--- Comment #20 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-08 14:03 ---
Subject: Bug 38152
Author: janus
Date: Wed Apr 8 14:03:33 2009
New Revision: 145735
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145735
Log:
2009-04-08 Janus Weil
PR fortr
--- Comment #21 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-08 14:11 ---
Fixed in trunk and 4.4. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
tus: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39692
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-09 09:41 ---
Fixed by r145815. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-09 09:39 ---
Subject: Bug 36704
Author: janus
Date: Thu Apr 9 09:39:09 2009
New Revision: 145815
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145815
Log:
2009-04-09 Janus Weil
PR fortr
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39695
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-11 10:30 ---
Subject: Bug 39692
Author: janus
Date: Sat Apr 11 10:30:29 2009
New Revision: 145955
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145955
Log:
2009-04-11 Janus Weil
PR fortr
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-11 10:32 ---
Fixed with r145955. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
ponent: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39735
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 11:29 ---
An example can be found in the following paper:
Norman S. Clerman: Note on creating an array of procedure pointers
ACM SIGPLAN Fortran Forum, Vol. 28, Issue 1 (2009)
http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1520752.1520753
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 09:06 ---
Subject: Bug 39735
Author: janus
Date: Wed Apr 22 09:05:58 2009
New Revision: 146554
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146554
Log:
2009-04-22 Janus Weil
PR fortr
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 09:24 ---
Fixed with r146554. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-23 12:24 ---
> > write_symbol(): bad module symbol 'x'
>
> Where does the symbol 'x' come from?
The 'x' here apparently is the formal argument of the sqrt() function!
I think Dominique
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-23 20:21 ---
> Janus, can you have a look? It looks like another fallout of your patch.
Indeed, it is.
> If it is not fixable quickly, we should consider backing it out
> until we have a working version.
The fix
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-24 08:34 ---
Subject: Bug 39861
Author: janus
Date: Fri Apr 24 08:34:14 2009
New Revision: 146677
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146677
Log:
2009-04-24 Janus Weil
PR fortran/39861
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-24 08:34 ---
Subject: Bug 39864
Author: janus
Date: Fri Apr 24 08:34:14 2009
New Revision: 146677
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146677
Log:
2009-04-24 Janus Weil
PR fortran/39861
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-24 08:39 ---
Fixed by r146677. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-24 08:39 ---
Fixed by r146677. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-24 17:59 ---
Confirmed. Here is a reduced test case, which does not have the problem with T2
discussed in comment #0, but still fails with the same error message:
MODULE MOD
TYPE T1
TYPE(T1), POINTER :: P
END TYPE
END
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-24 19:20 ---
Mine. The fix is completely trivial:
Index: gcc/fortran/decl.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/decl.c (Revision 146676)
+++ gcc/fortran/decl.c (Arbeitskopie
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-25 08:12 ---
Subject: Bug 39688
Author: janus
Date: Sat Apr 25 08:11:48 2009
New Revision: 146762
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146762
Log:
2009-04-25 Janus Weil
PR fortr
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-25 08:13 ---
Fixed in r146762. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39930
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-27 16:54 ---
Something like this should do it:
Index: gcc/fortran/parse.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/parse.c (Revision 146826)
+++ gcc/fortran/parse.c (Arbeitskopie
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-27 18:04 ---
An error message should be emitted already in the front end, probably in
gfc_check_pointer_assign (expr.c).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39931
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-27 19:09 ---
Patch:
Index: gcc/fortran/expr.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/expr.c (Revision 146847)
+++ gcc/fortran/expr.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -3070,8 +3070,8 @@
if
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 09:44 ---
Subject: Bug 39931
Author: janus
Date: Tue Apr 28 09:44:36 2009
New Revision: 146880
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146880
Log:
2009-04-28 Janus Weil
PR fortran/39930
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 09:44 ---
Subject: Bug 39930
Author: janus
Date: Tue Apr 28 09:44:36 2009
New Revision: 146880
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146880
Log:
2009-04-28 Janus Weil
PR fortran/39930
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 10:50 ---
Fixed with r146880. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 10:52 ---
Fixed with r146880. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
jects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39946
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 14:52 ---
Here's a patch:
Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/resolve.c (Revision 146879)
+++ gcc/fortran/resolve.c (Arbeits
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 16:27 ---
Subject: Bug 39946
Author: janus
Date: Tue Apr 28 16:27:27 2009
New Revision: 146905
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146905
Log:
2009-04-28 Janus Weil
PR fortr
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 16:31 ---
Fixed with r146905. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
iority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39998
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-13 19:47 ---
Subject: Bug 40941
Author: janus
Date: Thu Aug 13 19:46:46 2009
New Revision: 150725
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=150725
Log:
2009-08-13 Janus Weil
PR fortr
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-13 19:49 ---
Fixed with r150725. I don't think ts.interface can be incorporated into the
union easily. Therefore I'll close the PR.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-14 18:15 ---
Dominique,
are you sure that it works with 150730? Because this suspiciously looks like
fallout from my gfc_typespec patch, which is r150725.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41070
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-14 19:10 ---
After all 4.4 is working, so it surely is a regression.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-14 19:26 ---
Simple patch (regtesting right now):
Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/resolve.c (revision 150761)
+++ gcc/fortran/resolve.c
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-14 20:26 ---
Regtest was successful. Will commit as obvious.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41070
201 - 300 of 1036 matches
Mail list logo
