------- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-27 21:10 -------
> Actual, I have the feeling the attr.proc_pointer is not saved at all in > module.c, cf. ab_attribute in that file. Exactly. Thanks for pointing this out. The following patch fixes it: Index: gcc/fortran/module.c =================================================================== --- gcc/fortran/module.c (revision 139622) +++ gcc/fortran/module.c (working copy) @@ -1643,7 +1643,7 @@ mio_internal_string (char *string) typedef enum { AB_ALLOCATABLE, AB_DIMENSION, AB_EXTERNAL, AB_INTRINSIC, AB_OPTIONAL, - AB_POINTER, AB_TARGET, AB_DUMMY, AB_RESULT, AB_DATA, + AB_POINTER, AB_PROC_POINTER, AB_TARGET, AB_DUMMY, AB_RESULT, AB_DATA, AB_IN_NAMELIST, AB_IN_COMMON, AB_FUNCTION, AB_SUBROUTINE, AB_SEQUENCE, AB_ELEMENTAL, AB_PURE, AB_RECURSIVE, AB_GENERIC, AB_ALWAYS_EXPLICIT, AB_CRAY_POINTER, AB_CRAY_POINTEE, AB_THREADPRIVATE, AB_ALLOC_COMP, @@ -1661,6 +1661,7 @@ static const mstring attr_bits[] = minit ("INTRINSIC", AB_INTRINSIC), minit ("OPTIONAL", AB_OPTIONAL), minit ("POINTER", AB_POINTER), + minit ("PROC_POINTER", AB_PROC_POINTER), minit ("VOLATILE", AB_VOLATILE), minit ("TARGET", AB_TARGET), minit ("THREADPRIVATE", AB_THREADPRIVATE), @@ -1743,6 +1744,8 @@ mio_symbol_attribute (symbol_attribute * MIO_NAME (ab_attribute) (AB_OPTIONAL, attr_bits); if (attr->pointer) MIO_NAME (ab_attribute) (AB_POINTER, attr_bits); + if (attr->proc_pointer) + MIO_NAME (ab_attribute) (AB_PROC_POINTER, attr_bits); if (attr->is_protected) MIO_NAME (ab_attribute) (AB_PROTECTED, attr_bits); if (attr->value) @@ -1839,6 +1842,9 @@ mio_symbol_attribute (symbol_attribute * case AB_POINTER: attr->pointer = 1; break; + case AB_PROC_POINTER: + attr->proc_pointer = 1; + break; case AB_PROTECTED: attr->is_protected = 1; break; -- janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |janus at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2008-08-27 12:35:40 |2008-08-27 21:10:58 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37253