on operator instantiated
for conversion to self
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ja
--- Comment #2 from james dot kanze at gmail dot com 2007-04-01 15:42
---
Subject: Re: template user defined conversion operator instantiated for
conversion to self
On 1 Apr 2007 14:38:52 -, fang at csl dot cornell dot edu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Commen
--- Comment #37 from james dot kanze at gmail dot com 2007-05-08 16:11
---
Subject: Re: Lack of Posix compliant thread safety in std::basic_string
On 7 May 2007 21:08:05 -, gianni at mariani dot ws
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Comment #35 from gianni at maria
--- Comment #38 from james dot kanze at gmail dot com 2007-05-08 16:21
---
Subject: Re: Lack of Posix compliant thread safety in std::basic_string
On 8 May 2007 05:24:35 -, gianni at mariani dot ws
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Comment #36 from gianni at maria
4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: james dot kanze at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32141
--- Comment #2 from james dot kanze at gmail dot com 2007-11-12 17:56
---
(In reply to comment #0)
> class A{
> //
> };
> class B{
> public:
> explicit B(const A& a)
> : i_a(a)
> {
> }
> ~B()
> {
> }
> private:
> co
gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: james dot kanze at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
GCC host triplet
mal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: james dot kanze at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
GCC host triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
GCC target triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29834
--- Comment #3 from james dot kanze at gmail dot com 2006-11-15 10:05
---
Subject: Re: g++ thinks it is a declaration when it cannot be
On 14 Nov 2006 21:33:34 -, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I you use
> ( Doh ( x ) ), ++ x;
> it
--- Comment #4 from james dot kanze at gmail dot com 2006-11-15 10:10
---
Subject: Re: g++ thinks it is a declaration when it cannot be
On 15 Nov 2006 01:59:33 -, bangerth at dealii dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (Note that in the actual code, Doh was
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
