------- Comment #3 from james dot kanze at gmail dot com 2006-11-15 10:05 ------- Subject: Re: g++ thinks it is a declaration when it cannot be
On 14 Nov 2006 21:33:34 -0000, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I you use > ( Doh ( x ) ), ++ x; > it works. I know. I don't consider it a critical error, but it is legal code, so formally, at least, the compiler should accept it. > (EDG accepts the code unmodified) So does Sun CC and VC++. If I remember correctly, in the past, g++ has had problems with opting too soon for the declaration, before having seen enough of the context to know that it couldn't be. I suspect that this is just a case of the correction having missed a couple of cases. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29834
