https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70127
--- Comment #15 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14)
> but if you keep the e = a[0]; assignment, I really don't understand the last
> two statements. The kept statement already copied them, the extra stores
> don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69708
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor ---
I've posted one possible implementation of this feature to the mailing
list along with an explanation why it makes sense to actually do it
better and how :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg006
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor ---
The problem is that there is a PARM_DECL in the IL of the function
which is not listed among DECL_ARGUMENTS of the function:
The function we are in is:
(gdb) call debug_generic_expr(cfun->decl)
foo._omp_fn.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #22 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #18)
> Jakub: There is indeed aliasing issue, but with -fno-strict-aliasing the bug
> is the same.
>
> Apparently this is ipa-prop bug, because ipa-prop does not track
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #23 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Josh Poimboeuf from comment #20)
> Thanks very much to everyone who has looked into this so far. It would be
> very helpful to get answers to the following questions, so we can understand
> the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #25 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #22)
> I suppose the easiest fix is to overload the value field to store the
> size of the access for these two codes and then add the missing check.
OK, so the IS_NO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #26 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Josh Poimboeuf from comment #24)
>
> Yes, I'm looking for a general way to either prevent or try to detect
> potential other cases of the bug throughout the entire kernel.
>
> Can it only occu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #28 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #27)
> I was arguing that if IPA proves a condition to true/false then it
> should adjust it that way in modification phase.
The thing is that it does not prove i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #29 from Martin Jambor ---
Created attachment 38316
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38316&action=edit
Fix storing access size to conditions
Honza asked me to also come up with a version of the patch where we
stor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #31 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #30)
>
> Any reason it's not unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT size?
The only reason is to use the same type in which
get_ref_base_and_extent returns size.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70857
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor ---
Not surprisingly, it is adding -fopenacc to the compile options that
causes this. Because the testcase does not use any OpenACC
functionality, it should not matter. So something seems to go wrong
at omp low
||2016-05-01
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70857
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor ---
This bug is a consequence of false sharing of a RESULT_DECL between
the CPU-intended OpenMP outlined function and the HSA-intended
outlined (kernel) one. How come -fopenacc is necessary to trigger it,
I don'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70919
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor ---
The problem is that late SRA replaces scalar loads from constant pool
by replacements but fails to add their initializations to the
beginning of the function.
The reason for the omission is that
initialize_c
||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor ---
I'm working on this (using the PR 70719 testcase, though).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70884
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor ---
Oh, I have not noticed that Eric was already working on this. In any
event, I've posted my proposed patch to fix this, it is at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-05/msg01016.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70857
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon May 16 15:40:30 2016
New Revision: 236291
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236291&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 70857] Copy RESULT_DECL of HSA outlined kernel function
2016-05-16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70857
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon May 16 15:57:06 2016
New Revision: 236292
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236292&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 70857] Copy RESULT_DECL of HSA outlined kernel function
2016-05-16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70857
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71120
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #32 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed May 18 13:04:23 2016
New Revision: 236389
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236389&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 70646] Store size to inlining predicate conditions
2016-05-18 Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #33 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed May 18 13:06:24 2016
New Revision: 236390
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236390&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Respect --param ipa-max-agg-items=0
2016-05-18 Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69708
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed May 18 16:38:56 2016
New Revision: 236416
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236416&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Indirect inlining of targets from references of global constants
2016-0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69708
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed May 18 16:41:19 2016
New Revision: 236417
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236417&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Const parameters are always unmodified
2016-05-18 Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69708
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed May 18 16:44:08 2016
New Revision: 236418
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236418&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Allow constant global VAR_DECLs in constant jump functions
2016-05-18
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69708
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #35 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Thu May 19 15:00:12 2016
New Revision: 236463
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236463&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Respect --param ipa-max-agg-items=0
2016-05-19 Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #34 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Thu May 19 14:56:35 2016
New Revision: 236462
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236462&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 70646] Store size to inlining predicate conditions
2016-05-19 Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #36 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Thu May 19 15:09:21 2016
New Revision: 236473
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236473&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 70646] Store size to inlining predicate conditions
2016-05-19 Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #37 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Thu May 19 15:10:50 2016
New Revision: 236474
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236474&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Respect --param ipa-max-agg-items=0
2016-05-19 Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #38 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Thu May 19 15:17:10 2016
New Revision: 236475
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236475&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 70646] Store size to inlining predicate conditions
2016-05-19 Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #39 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Thu May 19 15:19:59 2016
New Revision: 236476
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236476&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Respect --param ipa-max-agg-items=0
2016-05-19 Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70884
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri May 20 21:04:31 2016
New Revision: 236544
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236544&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 70884] Constant pool SRA fix
2016-05-20 Martin Jambor
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70884
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 regression] 2nd SRA|[6 regression] 2nd SRA pass
||2016-05-23
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70884
--- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon May 23 11:27:14 2016
New Revision: 236584
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236584&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 70884] Constant pool SRA fix
2016-05-23 Martin Jambor
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70884
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70919
Bug 70919 depends on bug 70884, which changed state.
Bug 70884 Summary: [6 regression] 2nd SRA pass confused by load from constant
pool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70884
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71190
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71234
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon May 23 16:31:14 2016
New Revision: 236598
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236598&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 71234] Avoid valgrind warning in ipa-cp
2016-05-23 Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71234
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71414
--- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> An interesting observation is that we clone sum32 for IPA-CP of n == 1024 but
> for some unknown reason figure Alignment of 'a' as unusable:
The function sum32
gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #0)
> I noticed that with HSA offloading enabled, as of r250048 ("Avoid global
> optimize flag checks in LTO")
This is a bug in that commit, version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81477
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
I have posted the fix to the mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg01909.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81477
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Jul 31 11:18:31 2017
New Revision: 250738
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250738&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 81477] Set versionable regardless of optimization level
2017-07-31
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81477
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Revision r238364 has changes the cost of vec_construct in
ix86_builtin_vectorization_cost. On one hand, the new code correctly
models the number of vecotr inserts, but on the other it
||2017-08-02
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor ---
For the record, our plan is to address this with the following patch
from Richi (after we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81673
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> What happens if you use -march=intel.
With -mtune=intel, the lower half of the vector is moved directly
whereas the upper one is still done through the stack:
Priority: P3
Component: hsa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Running brig FE testsuite reveals new failures:
FAIL: brig.dg/test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81713
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pekka.jaaskelainen@parmance
at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor ---
I'll have a look. The assert on in_lto_p is scary though :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81702
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81713
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68033
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77732
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> So hppa uses invisible reference to pass the struct argument.
> Thus I guess we should not run the test-case on hppa target? Martin can you
> please take a look?
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 41988
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41988&action=edit
Testcase
Starting with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81848
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-linux
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81354
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81848
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2017-08-18
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor ---
I have a prototype patch and will start testing and benchmarking it soon.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81673
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||80689
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor
at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor ---
Reconfirmed and mine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82078
--- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor ---
Thanks for a nice small testcase. I have proposed a fix on the mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-09/msg00321.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82078
--- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Sep 6 09:25:00 2017
New Revision: 251756
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251756&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Enqueue all SRA links for write flag propagation
2017-09-06 Martin Jam
Priority: P3
Component: hsa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I have tracked a number of new run-time HSA failures to r251264
||2017-09-06
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Jambor ---
I will have a look at what is going on.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82119
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Sep 11 09:09:26 2017
New Revision: 251964
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251964&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Make HSA resilient to side-effects of split_edge
2017-09-11 Martin Jam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82119
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78869
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|78687 |80293
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79375
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80293
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Apr 24 15:13:39 2017
New Revision: 247104
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247104&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 80293] Dont totally-scalarize char arrays
2017-04-24 Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80293
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80505
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80505
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80505
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> > And by the way, I tend to think that the testcase should use
> > -fno-indirect-inlining option, the indirect call is direct when the
> > IPA layer sees it.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78687
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue May 2 12:49:55 2017
New Revision: 247497
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247497&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 78687] Set SRA grp_write lazily
2017-05-02 Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78687
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor ---
Mine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80622
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
The simplest fix is the following, but I'll move the whole test a bit
earlier in a patch to the mailing list:
diff --git a/gcc/tree-sra.c b/gcc/tree-sra.c
index 1606573aead..79ca1666c15 100644
--- a/gcc/tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80622
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #6)
> The simplest fix is the following, but I'll move the whole test a bit
> earlier in a patch to the mailing list:
Which is now posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80622
--- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Thu May 4 16:19:20 2017
New Revision: 247604
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247604&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 80622] Treat const pools as initialized in SRA
2017-05-04 Martin J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80622
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80622
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2017-05-15
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Jambor ---
Confirmed and probably not easily fixable in the current IPA-SRA
framework. IPA SRA changes the IRA in a way
at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor ---
I will have a look.
at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #21 from Martin Jambor ---
I will have a look after dealing with PR 80898 which seems to be
easier to reproduce. With some luck, it is going to be the same bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80293
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80293
--- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed May 31 08:45:23 2017
New Revision: 248724
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248724&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 80293] Dont totally-scalarize char arrays
2017-05-31 Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78869
Bug 78869 depends on bug 80293, which changed state.
Bug 80293 Summary: [6/7 Regression] unnecessary code at -O2 (-O1 is fine)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80293
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80898
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor ---
Created attachment 41443
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41443&action=edit
First fix
This patch fixes the issue, but I think I can now think of a slightly
more complicated scenario in wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80898
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Thu Jun 1 12:14:29 2017
New Revision: 248790
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248790&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 80898] Propagate grp_write from disqualified SRA candidates
2017-06
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80898
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80803
--- Comment #22 from Martin Jambor ---
So, PR 80898 is now fixed. Can you please check if this is perhaps a
duplicate? It may as well be.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80803
--- Comment #25 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to boger from comment #17)
> I run these tests after a build by first editing the
> src/libgo/testsuite/gotest to set keep=true and trace=true. Then I go to my
> bld directory:
>
> cd bld/powerpc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80803
--- Comment #27 from Martin Jambor ---
Created attachment 41517
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41517&action=edit
Hack for revealing compiler command lines
Thanks Ian, the above was definitely helpful but did not allow me to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80803
--- Comment #28 from Martin Jambor ---
Created attachment 41518
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41518&action=edit
Possible fix
I'm testing the attached two patches which should fix the issue. If
everything goes well, I will
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80803
--- Comment #30 from Martin Jambor ---
I have posted the following two patches to fix this issue to the
mailing list. The second one also includes two simple C testcases:
- https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-06/msg00833.html
- https://
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81063
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1001 - 1100 of 2365 matches
Mail list logo
