https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #29 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Created attachment 38316 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38316&action=edit Fix storing access size to conditions Honza asked me to also come up with a version of the patch where we store access size to the condition (as a HOST_WIDE_INT) and use that for access size comparisons, so that we avoid any potential confusion (for example if the loaded value is run through a NOP_EXPR after loading but before the described use). So this is it. It survives both regular and LTO bootstrap and testing on an x86_64-linux.
