[Bug regression/48129] New: [4.7 Regression]: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/snprintf-chk.c ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48129 Summary: [4.7 Regression]: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/snprintf-chk.c ICE Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity:

[Bug libstdc++/48130] New: [4.7 Regression]: build fails on libsupc++/nested_exception.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48130 Summary: [4.7 Regression]: build fails on libsupc++/nested_exception.cc Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug tree-optimization/48129] [4.7 Regression]: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/snprintf-chk.c ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48129 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/48130] [4.7 Regression]: build fails on libsupc++/nested_exception.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48130 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug regression/48163] New: [4.7 Regression]: ICEs for cris-elf, like gcc.c-torture/compile/calls.c gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48163 Summary: [4.7 Regression]: ICEs for cris-elf, like gcc.c-torture/compile/calls.c gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-1.c Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/48163] [4.7 Regression]: ICEs for cris-elf, like gcc.c-torture/compile/calls.c gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48163 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug regression/48263] New: [4.7 Regression]: build fails for cris-elf in libgfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48263 Summary: [4.7 Regression]: build fails for cris-elf in libgfortran Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build, ice-on-valid-code Sev

[Bug rtl-optimization/48263] [4.7 Regression]: build fails for cris-elf in libgfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48263 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Component|regression |rtl-optimization Target M

[Bug rtl-optimization/48263] [4.7 Regression]: build fails for cris-elf in libgfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48263 --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-03-24 01:15:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > I don't know if this is a bug in optabs or a target issue. An optabs issue. > But what is happening is that since ior is an commutative, it

[Bug rtl-optimization/48331] [4.7 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c FAILs with -O -fira-algorithm=priority -fPIC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48331 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/48334] [4.7 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr39445.c FAILs with -fira-algorithm=priority

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48334 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/48338] [4.7 Regression] Glibc miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48338 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/48338] [4.7 Regression] Glibc miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48338 --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-03-30 01:48:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > I'm guessing this is the recent RA changes in r171649. Oops, sorry; you already triaged it.

[Bug target/48348] New: incorrect loongson builtin pcmpgtb_u

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48348 Summary: incorrect loongson builtin pcmpgtb_u Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/48348] incorrect loongson builtin pcmpgtb_u

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48348 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/48371] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure

||2011.03.30 22:40:17 CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-03-30 22:40:17 UTC --- FWIW, cris-elf too, worked:firstbreak 171723:171735 as follows: /obj

[Bug bootstrap/48371] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48371 --- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-03-30 23:26:54 UTC --- Created attachment 23828 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23828 Preprocessed libgcc2.i, repeat ICE for cris-elf with -fpreprocessed libgcc2.i -march=v32 -O2 I

[Bug bootstrap/48371] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48371 --- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-03-31 04:55:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > If you could verify that > change fixes the cris problems it would be greatly appreciated (that > patch wasn't supposed to change code generation at all

[Bug regression/48477] New: [4.7 Regression]: gfortran.dg/coarray_13.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48477 Summary: [4.7 Regression]: gfortran.dg/coarray_13.f90 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug regression/48477] [4.7 Regression]: gfortran.dg/coarray_13.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48477 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/48610] New: [4.3 Regression]: loop miscompilation; load removed by -funroll-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48610 Summary: [4.3 Regression]: loop miscompilation; load removed by -funroll-loops Product: gcc Version: 4.3.6 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/48610] [4.3 Regression]: loop miscompilation; load removed by -funroll-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48610 --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-04-14 17:06:40 UTC --- Created attachment 23985 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23985 Bug "driver": compile options are unimportant, link to the other attachment

[Bug tree-optimization/48610] [4.3 Regression]: loop miscompilation; load removed by -funroll-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48610 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/48068] loongson intrinsics improvement opportunities

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48068 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/48658] New: [4.3 Regression]: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:395

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48658 Summary: [4.3 Regression]: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:395 Product: gcc Version: 4.3.6 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/48658] [4.3 Regression]: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:395

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48658 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/48675] New: [4.7 Regression]: 20_util/hash/chi2_quality.cc timeout

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48675 Summary: [4.7 Regression]: 20_util/hash/chi2_quality.cc timeout Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Ass

[Bug testsuite/48675] [4.7 Regression]: 20_util/hash/chi2_quality.cc timeout

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48675 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW URL|

[Bug testsuite/48675] [4.7 Regression]: 20_util/hash/chi2_quality.cc timeout

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48675 --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-04-19 03:58:08 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Tue Apr 19 03:58:04 2011 New Revision: 172691 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172691 Log: PR testsuite/48675 * testsuite/20_util/ha

[Bug testsuite/48675] [4.7 Regression]: 20_util/hash/chi2_quality.cc timeout

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48675 --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-04-19 03:59:19 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Tue Apr 19 03:59:16 2011 New Revision: 172692 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172692 Log: PR testsuite/48675 * testsuite/20_util/ha

[Bug testsuite/48675] [4.7 Regression]: 20_util/hash/chi2_quality.cc timeout

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48675 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/48663] [4.7 regression] final.c:dump_basic_block_info breaks several Tru64 UNIX tests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48663 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/47596] internal compiler error: in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:10894

||2011.04.29 18:25:30 CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|WORKSFORME | Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-04-29 18:25:30 UTC --- Reopened as per

[Bug target/48830] New: [4.4/4.6 Regression] unrecognized insn storing fp (simd) reg in SImode to stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48830 Summary: [4.4/4.6 Regression] unrecognized insn storing fp (simd) reg in SImode to stack Product: gcc Version: 4.4.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug target/48830] [4.4/4.6 Regression] unrecognized insn storing fp (simd) reg in SImode to stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48830 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/48830] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] unrecognized insn: storing invalid upper fp reg in SImode to stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48830 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |hp at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/48830] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] unrecognized insn: storing invalid upper fp reg in SImode to stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48830 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.4/4.6 Regression]|[4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 |

[Bug target/48830] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] unrecognized insn: storing invalid upper fp reg in SImode to stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48830 --- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-05-01 01:50:46 UTC --- Created attachment 24156 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24156 Tentative patch fixing subreg_get_info, untested. This likely has fallout for sparc 32-bit, as

[Bug target/48830] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] unrecognized insn: storing invalid upper fp reg in SImode to stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48830 --- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-05-01 01:52:16 UTC --- Either patch fixes the test-case. Both should eventually be applied to trunk, but perhaps just the sparc one to branches.

[Bug target/48830] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] unrecognized insn: storing invalid upper fp reg in SImode to stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48830 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter N

[Bug target/48840] New: [4.4/4.7 Regression] ICE, gcc_assert (old_frame_size == get_frame_size ()) maybe fp/vis-related

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48840 Summary: [4.4/4.7 Regression] ICE, gcc_assert (old_frame_size == get_frame_size ()) maybe fp/vis-related Product: gcc Version: 4.4.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-val

[Bug target/48840] [4.4/4.7 Regression] ICE, gcc_assert (old_frame_size == get_frame_size ()) maybe fp/vis-related

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48840 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/48840] [4.4/4.7 Regression] ICE, gcc_assert (old_frame_size == get_frame_size ()) maybe fp/vis-related

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48840 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Target||sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu --- Commen

[Bug middle-end/48908] New: [4.7 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf in libiberty:md5.c, shift-related

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48908 Summary: [4.7 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf in libiberty:md5.c, shift-related Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build, ice-on-valid-code

[Bug middle-end/48908] [4.7 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf in libiberty:md5.c, shift-related

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48908 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/48974] VIS intrinsics improvement opportunities

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48974 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/48974] New: VIS intrinsics improvement opportunities

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48974 Summary: VIS intrinsics improvement opportunities Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 C

[Bug middle-end/48989] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/lto/pr46036 f_lto_pr46036_0.o assemble

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48989 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/45792] New: [4.6 Regression]: cris-elf build failure (hangs) due to fix for PR44374

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45792 Summary: [4.6 Regression]: cris-elf build failure (hangs) due to fix for PR44374 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/45792] [4.6 Regression]: cris-elf build failure (hangs) due to fix for PR44374

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45792 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/45792] [4.6 Regression]: cris-elf build failure (hangs) due to fix for PR44374

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45792 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/45792] [4.6 Regression]: cris-elf build failure (hangs) due to fix for PR44374

||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p ||atches/2010-09/msg02097.htm ||l AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |hp at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/45792] [4.6 Regression]: cris-elf build failure (hangs) due to fix for PR44374

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45792 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added URL|http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p |http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p

[Bug rtl-optimization/45792] [4.6 Regression]: cris-elf build failure (hangs) due to fix for PR44374

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45792 --- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-09-27 19:55:31 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Mon Sep 27 19:55:29 2010 New Revision: 164663 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164663 Log: PR rtl-optimization/45792 * cfgcleanup.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/45792] [4.6 Regression]: cris-elf build failure (hangs) due to fix for PR44374

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45792 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/45656] [4.6 Regression]: gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 -O3, wrong code with -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45656 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.5 Regression]: |[4.6 Regression]:

[Bug libstdc++/45841] New: [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841 Summary: [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug libstdc++/45841] [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841 --- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-09-30 11:46:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Or do you guys happen to have a setup I can ssh into? :v) Nominally, you *could* repeat my findings with a cross-compiler setup as described by

[Bug libstdc++/45841] [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841 --- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-09-30 22:55:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > I somewhat doubt this will fix it, but if it's not more effort, then please > use > the patch for an additional test run. Thank you, testing in progr

[Bug libstdc++/45841] [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841 --- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-10-01 03:15:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > I somewhat doubt this will fix it, but if it's not more effort, then please > use > the patch for an additional test run. That patch made no differen

[Bug testsuite/45841] [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Component|libstdc++ |testsuite --- Comment #15 from Hans-

[Bug testsuite/45841] [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

||2010.10.04 23:59:13 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |hp at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Ever Confirmed|0 |1

[Bug testsuite/45841] [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841 --- Comment #18 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-10-05 01:58:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) > What the testcase ends up doing is extending the file and then reading past > EOF. That's not illegal behavior and the case as written should still pa

[Bug testsuite/45841] [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841 --- Comment #20 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-10-05 04:02:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > Apparently > reading after a write at EOF is not in the tests. Good you noticed. > Yeah lol, I don't know if the regression case is really necessary

[Bug libstdc++/45841] [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841 --- Comment #22 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-10-05 17:03:09 UTC --- Just a heads-up regarding issue #3. (In reply to comment #19) > Apparently > reading after a write at EOF is not in the tests. Hm, doesn't 27_io/basic_filebuf/sputbackc/char/94

[Bug libstdc++/45841] [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841 --- Comment #26 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-10-05 18:45:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #24) > Did I follow the wrong process for deleting the file? No, the commit was fine, it's the "svn diff" that fails. (In reply to comment #25) > A putback

[Bug libstdc++/45841] [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841 --- Comment #27 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-10-05 18:59:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #26) > looks like I have to amend > the check_v3_target_fileio some more and fix another simulator bug. Film at > 11. JFTR, the simulator part (the wrap fu

[Bug libstdc++/45841] [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841 --- Comment #31 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-10-05 21:26:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #28) > I'm a little confused. Is that supposed to be a sticky state? Nope. Don't worry. The patch I quoted just fixes a bug on the return path from the ho

[Bug libstdc++/45841] [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841 --- Comment #32 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-10-05 21:40:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #29) > Otherwise, if the situation is too confused maybe we have to humbly take out > the improvements to filebuf, allow HP to fix the other issues on the ta

[Bug libstdc++/45841] [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841 --- Comment #35 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-10-05 23:16:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #30) > Also, I think we need to clarify whether 9425.cc is a regression. That was an > expected failure before my revision, right? Yes and no. By fixing on

[Bug libstdc++/45841] [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841 --- Comment #36 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-10-05 23:29:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #33) > (In reply to comment #32) > > Thanks for caring but FWIW, my work would not be helped by backing out any > > changes; I do all the work at a fix set o

[Bug libstdc++/45841] [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841 --- Comment #43 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-10-05 23:52:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #37) > (In reply to comment #35) > > Yes and no. By fixing one of the two (known :) simulator bugs and running > > the > > test-suite for r164529, the resu

[Bug lto/45907] [4.6 Regression] Revision 164995 failed gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-*.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45907 --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-10-07 00:35:09 UTC --- cris-elf too, whee.

[Bug libstdc++/45841] [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841 --- Comment #45 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-10-07 21:46:55 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Thu Oct 7 21:46:51 2010 New Revision: 165136 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165136 Log: PR libstdc++/45841 * testsuite/lib/libst

[Bug libstdc++/45841] [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/44150] [4.6 regression] g++.dg/lto/20081109 cp_lto_20081109_0.o-cp_lto_20081109_1.o

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44150 --- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-10-08 01:16:24 UTC --- Has this intentionally been solved or did it just go latent? For cris-elf, it disappeared in (r164989:165011].

[Bug rtl-optimization/45656] [4.6 Regression]: gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 -O3, wrong code with -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45656 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Component|debug |rtl-optimization --- Comment #14 fro

[Bug debug/45656] [4.6 Regression]: gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 -O3, wrong code with -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45656 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|debug --- Comment #16 from Hans-Pete

[Bug rtl-optimization/45962] New: [4.6 Regression]: many c/c++ failures on cris-elf, in r165236:165242

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962 Summary: [4.6 Regression]: many c/c++ failures on cris-elf, in r165236:165242 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, wrong-code

[Bug rtl-optimization/45962] [4.6 Regression]: many c/c++ failures on cris-elf, in r165236:165242

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962 --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-10-11 17:37:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Please give me pre-processed sources to test. I tried building a > cross-toolchain to cris-elf, but I don't see that failure. I see > many others due

[Bug rtl-optimization/45962] [4.6 Regression]: many c/c++ failures on cris-elf, in r165236:165242

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug middle-end/45962] [4.6 Regression]: many c/c++ failures on cris-elf, in r165236:165242

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962 --- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-10-12 02:31:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Fixed. Not really until it's committed. Pending approval? Or a missing git2svn push?

[Bug middle-end/45962] [4.6 Regression]: many c/c++ failures on cris-elf, in r165236:165242

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code | Status|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/45962] [4.6 Regression]: many c/c++ failures on cris-elf, in r165236:165242

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962 --- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-10-12 20:23:26 UTC --- I think I'm going to use gcc.c-torture/execute/simd-5.c at -O0. I'll compare r165239 to (r165240 plus your commit at r165382), ok? Looking at r165240, I have a hunch that we're g

[Bug middle-end/45962] [4.6 Regression]: many c/c++ failures on cris-elf, in r165236:165242

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962 --- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-10-12 21:55:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #8) > > I have to reopen this: the SEGV ICE is gone, but no regressions were > > fixed... > > These aren't technically regressi

[Bug middle-end/45962] [4.6 Regression]: many c/c++ failures on cris-elf, in r165236:165242

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962 --- Comment #13 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-10-12 22:15:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > You don't agree they're new tests, or you don't agree that they > will fail when run by hand on the older compiler? Both. They exist and run and PASS

[Bug middle-end/45962] [4.6 Regression]: many c/c++ failures on cris-elf, in r165236:165242

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962 --- Comment #14 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-10-12 22:49:23 UTC --- Created attachment 22025 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22025 tarball with asm files and somewhat readable simulator traces Just dumping state. Not expecti

[Bug lto/45907] [4.6 Regression] Revision 164995 failed gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-*.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45907 --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-10-13 03:12:27 UTC --- This was fixed by a commit in the range 165061:165143 (or, from looking at gcc-testresults, 165092:165096), right?

[Bug middle-end/45962] [4.6 Regression]: many c/c++ failures on cris-elf, in r165236:165242

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962 --- Comment #15 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-10-19 02:37:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > I haven't yet figured out which function's stack-frame is borked / where > exactly the saved value of r7 is clobbered. Tomorrow. Ookay, so... With r1

[Bug middle-end/45962] [4.6 Regression]: many c/c++ failures on cris-elf, in r165236:165242

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962 --- Comment #17 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-10-19 22:21:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > MAX_STACK_ALIGNMENT should be MAX_OFILE_ALIGNMENT if you support > the full stack re-alignment scheme. Is there a particular reason it should be MAX_

[Bug libstdc++/46272] New: [4.6 Regression]: libstdc++ fails to build due to atomic-constexpr-changes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46272 Summary: [4.6 Regression]: libstdc++ fails to build due to atomic-constexpr-changes Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build Severity: norma

[Bug libstdc++/46272] [4.6 Regression]: libstdc++ fails to build due to atomic-constexpr-changes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46272 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libffi/46792] New: libffi fails building for cris-elf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46792 Summary: libffi fails building for cris-elf Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libffi AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc

[Bug libffi/46792] libffi fails building for cris-elf

||2010.12.03 20:21:50 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |hp at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Ever Confirmed|0 |1

[Bug libffi/46792] libffi fails building for cris-elf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46792 --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-12-03 20:38:54 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Fri Dec 3 20:38:47 2010 New Revision: 167442 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167442 Log: PR libffi/46792 * configure.ac (cris-*-el

[Bug libffi/46792] libffi fails building for cris-elf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46792 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|SUSPENDED

[Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501 --- Comment #48 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-12-10 00:08:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #47) > WONTFIX means GCC devs don't want a fix. Not quite, and saying it that way, sends the wrong message. It's more like "are not going to put resources

[Bug rtl-optimization/49154] New: [4.7 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf in libgcc: ICE in setup_pressure_classes, at ira.c:902

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49154 Summary: [4.7 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf in libgcc: ICE in setup_pressure_classes, at ira.c:902 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build, ic

[Bug target/49211] MMIX: Code generation broken, when using global variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49211 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/49211] MMIX: Code generation broken, when using global variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49211 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >