http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841
--- Comment #35 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-10-05 23:16:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #30) > Also, I think we need to clarify whether 9425.cc is a regression. That was an > expected failure before my revision, right? Yes and no. By fixing one of the two (known :) simulator bugs and running the test-suite for r164529, the result of that test regressed from PASS to FAIL.
