http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59584
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
With the latest backports by Jakub (206335:206398], it regressed on the 4.8
branch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58956
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59470
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59584
--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> I still think this is not the correct definition of regression, I believe
> regression is regressing against released compiler version. If somebody
> commits
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59584
--- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Author: hp
Date: Thu Jan 9 00:23:22 2014
New Revision: 206453
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206453&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2013-12-23 Hans-Peter Nilsson
PR m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59825
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
Priority: P3
Component: regression
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld.de
Host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Target: cris-axis-elf
This test previously passed, now
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60173
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60173
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Author: hp
Date: Sat Feb 22 16:58:06 2014
New Revision: 208044
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208044&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/60173
* lib/target-supports.exp
(check_effective_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60173
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: regression
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: amker at gcc dot gnu.org
Host: x86_64-unk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60363
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Created attachment 32230
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32230&action=edit
ssa-dom-thread-4.c.078t.dom1 for cris-elf.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55035
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Com
||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Mentioned as SPARC-breaking in PR55035#11.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 55035 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49429
--- Comment #20 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #19)
> Would you guys with access to the affected platforms please let me know in
> case revision 229696, just installed in the trunk, regresses this?
Yes, I w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5 Regression] Several |[5 Regression] Several
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
--- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9)
> Who is waving anything away?
I wasn't referring to you. Apparently I was referring to a comment that was
supposed to be ignored.
> I've been fixing thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
--- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Created attachment 34344
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34344&action=edit
Call-trace for testsuite/22_locale/locale/cons/6.cc on cris-elf, a "newlib
target"
Plain execution trace
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Host: x86_64-linux
Target: cris-elf
These tests used to pass for cris-elf, but has feiled since a commit in the
range (217057
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #0)
> I'll triage the revision range to exclude that.
It's one of 217063-217066, inclusive.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> Almost certainly r217066.
>
> Is this a newlib target?
Yes.
> I would expect to see the same failure for all
> newlib targets, as I defined std::ctype_b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> Almost certainly r217066.
>
> Is this a newlib target? I would expect to see the same failure for all
> newlib targets,
I verified that this is the case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62250
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62250
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #4)
> Also, the patch should have used
> atomic-dg.exp instead of manually adding the search paths.
Easier said than done, unfortunately. Doing a simpler fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62250
--- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Created attachment 34394
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34394&action=edit
Patch to add -latomic only when available; -p0 -d path/to/gcc/testsuite
David, could you please check if t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63900
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62250
--- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Author: hp
Date: Thu Jan 8 21:57:49 2015
New Revision: 219364
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219364&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/62250
* lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62250
--- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Author: hp
Date: Thu Jan 8 21:59:26 2015
New Revision: 219365
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219365&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/62250
* lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_t
-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Created attachment 34414
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34414&action=edit
Observe crash with ./cc1 -quiet -fpreprocessed unwin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64552
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||cris-elf
Status|UNCONFI
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: torvald at gcc dot gnu.org
Host: x86_64-linux-gnu
Target: cris-elf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64638
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Forgot to say the obvious: committer in CC is singled out only because of the
context of the error message.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64638
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64638
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
--- Comment #26 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #25)
> Great, thanks for confirming it. As you say, let's leave this open for now
> in case HP or Rainer still sees some of these failures.
JFTR, for cris-elf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
--- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Hm, considering the recently-applied patch at r220392, why does my autotester
still see these fail at r220396?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61548
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61548
--- Comment #25 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Created attachment 34695
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34695&action=edit
Assembly file showing the duplicate label
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
To wit, at r220506 still see:
assertion "!t.isctype('\n', t.lookup_classname(blank,
blank+sizeof(blank)/sizeof(blank[0])-1))" failed: file
"/tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/28_regex/trait
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
--- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #9)
> To wit, at r220506 still see:
> assertion "!t.isctype('\n', t.lookup_classname(blank,
> blank+sizeof(blank)/sizeof(blank[0])-1))" failed: file
> "/tmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61548
--- Comment #28 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #27)
> Does the following patch fix the problem?
Yes! Full regtest is underway but this particular FAIL is fixed. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61548
--- Comment #29 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #28)
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #27)
> > Does the following patch fix the problem?
>
> Yes! Full regtest is underway but this particular FAIL i
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Host: x86_64-linux-gnu
Target: cris-elf
This test used to pass. Since a commit in the range
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|[5 Regression] |26_numerics/random/binomial
|26_numerics/random/binomial |_distribution/operators/val
|_distribution/operators/val |ues.cc times out on slow
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65093
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Author: hp
Date: Thu Feb 19 19:30:03 2015
New Revision: 220821
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220821&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/65093
* testsuite/26_numerics/random/binomial_distr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65093
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62102
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dj at gcc dot gnu.org
Host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Target: cris-axis-elf
This test used to pass and now fails
||2014-07-14
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Comfirmed at r212486 (-O2 and not -O2 -flto). Also seen for
mmix-knuth-mmixware so apparently not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61796
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #3)
> (In reply to dhowe...@redhat.com from comment #1)
> > Index: gcc/config.gcc
> > ===
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38603
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2014-7-15
--- Comment #5 from Hans-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Created attachment 33121
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33121&action=edit
Patch to config.gcc
Correct patch to config.gcc required to actually build the compiler proper.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to dhowe...@redhat.com from comment #0)
BTW,
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
> See <
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to dhowe...@redhat.com from comment #0)
> ../../../gcc-4.9.0-20140702/libgcc/libgcc2.c: In function ‘__subvsi3’:
> ../../../gcc-4.9.0-20140702/libgcc/libgcc2.c:122:1: error: unrecognizable
> in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #8)
> This symbol_ref must be wrapped inside a CONST by the middle-end.
Uh, strike that, I'm hallucinating.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #13 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to dhowe...@redhat.com from comment #12)
> (In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #6)
> > Created attachment 33121 [details]
> > Patch to config.gcc
> >
> > Correct patch to config.gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #14 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to dhowe...@redhat.com from comment #10)
> (In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #7)
> > (In reply to dhowe...@redhat.com from comment #0)
> > > I'm also very intrigued by that last lin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #16 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Author: hp
Date: Thu Jul 17 02:03:52 2014
New Revision: 212708
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212708&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/61737.
* config/cris/cris.c (TARGET_LEGITIMATE_CONSTA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #17 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Author: hp
Date: Thu Jul 17 03:53:23 2014
New Revision: 212713
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212713&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from trunk.
PR target/61737.
* config/cris/cris.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
-17
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
cris-elf too, appearing in the svn revision interval (212498:212499].
I think I noticed some traffic and perhaps a patch go by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #20 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Unfortunately, at the face of it, I think the only factors common with PR61844
are "rot at the RTL level" and "building libgcc". (My own involvement with
SH64 is too far in the past and then only perip
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #21 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #20)
> Unfortunately, at the face of it, I think the only factors common with
> PR61844 are "rot at the RTL level" and "building libgcc".
Apparently also "w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55035
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2013-02-27 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55035
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #1)
> Also seen for gcc-4.9.1 ppc64-linux host (gcc110)
I.e. host gcc-4.9.1 on gcc110 compiling trunk r212879.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55035
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.10.0
--- Comment #3 from Hans-Pet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54664
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Known
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61510
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Priority: P3
Component: regression
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: hubicka at ucw dot cz
Host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Target: cris-axis-elf
These tests previously passed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62102
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> +2014-06-28 Jan Hubicka
> +
> + * tree-inline.c (remap_type_1): Do not duplicate fields
> + that are shared in between type and its main vari
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61566
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62213
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62213
--- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #2)
> cris-elf too, (214220:214238].
...but went away with a commit in (214263:214274].
||2014-09-19
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Confirmed the general observation; observed (as far back as) 4.7 era and trunk
at r215401 for cris-elf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61283
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3)
> Does this still reproduce?
It still does at least for MMIX as described, at r215419.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61283
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61825
--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Seems to be fixed, but I'm leaving the closing step to the reporter (Rainer).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63255
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Seems to be fixed, but I'm leaving the closing step to the reporter (Andreas).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #33 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #32)
> Patch for SH untyped_call
> config/sh/sh.md (untyped_call): Clobber function value registers before
> call.
(Sorry for butting in; I'm CC'ed with the pu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #38 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #34)
> For reference,
> i386.md emits a blockage (i.e. *using* and clobbering all
> registers).
> It
> looks all ports including SH emit a blockage after stori
||2015-11-29
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Thanks for the report
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66004
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #6)
> HP, I think I need bit more analysis here. Do you know what inline decision
> actually causes the trouble?
Um, no. I have barely even tracked regression, mu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69040
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||4.3.5
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.5
Known to fail||4.0.1
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
I can't reproduce this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66486
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66004
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67055
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37916
--- Comment #20 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-03-11
01:31:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> Random thought on this PR: With a scheduler description, -fschedule-insns
> -fsched-pressure may help.
That theory should be testable by compiling fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48068
Summary: loongson intrinsics improvement opportunities
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48068
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-03-11
02:33:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 23622
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23622
Trivial stdint.h suitable for showing the problem after "make all-gcc"
standalone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48068
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-03-11
02:42:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 23623
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23623
With --target=mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu, result of "./xgcc -W -Wall -O2 -B./ -S
-I. -march=loongs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48068
--- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-03-11
02:48:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 23624
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23624
23623: With --target=mips64el-unknown-linux-gnu, result of "./xgcc -W -Wall -O2
-B./ -S -I. -mar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
501 - 600 of 1146 matches
Mail list logo
