[Bug tree-optimization/41031] [4.5 Regression]: build breakage for cris-elf building newlib, ICE in insert_value_copy_on_edge

2009-08-11 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-11 09:26 --- (In reply to comment #3) > The same happens when bootstrapping on s390x while building libdecnumber. Here > is a reduced testcase: At -O1, the simplified test-case exposes the bug for cris-elf too. FWIW, I gue

[Bug bootstrap/41031] [4.5 Regression] ICE in insert_value_copy_on_edge preventing bootstrap on sparc64 and s390x, testcase on cris-elf

2009-08-12 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-12 10:30 --- (In reply to comment #6) > From just reading the ChangeLog, a likely candidate: That's already established by the revision range in the description. :) The patch is already approved, so I'm going to commit

[Bug bootstrap/41031] [4.5 Regression] ICE in insert_value_copy_on_edge preventing bootstrap on sparc64 and s390x, testcase on cris-elf

2009-08-12 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-12 10:34 --- (In reply to comment #8) > The patch is already approved, so I'm going to commit it on behalf of > rsandifo. Oops, I see it's not completely tested yet. Ok, I'm doing a test-run on cris-elf fir

[Bug bootstrap/41031] [4.5 Regression] ICE in insert_value_copy_on_edge preventing bootstrap on sparc64 and s390x, testcase on cris-elf

2009-08-12 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-12 14:11 --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > The patch is already approved, so I'm going to commit it on behalf of > > rsandifo. > > Oops, I see it's not completely tested yet

[Bug bootstrap/41031] [4.5 Regression] ICE in insert_value_copy_on_edge preventing bootstrap on sparc64 and s390x, testcase on cris-elf

2009-08-12 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-13 05:30 --- . -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug target/23424] cris.md rtl canonicalization bug

2005-11-04 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-04 21:20 --- Subject: Bug 23424 Author: hp Date: Fri Nov 4 21:20:24 2005 New Revision: 106506 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106506 Log: PR target/23424 * config/cris/predi

[Bug target/23424] cris.md rtl canonicalization bug

2005-11-04 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-04 21:24 --- Subject: Bug 23424 Author: hp Date: Fri Nov 4 21:24:20 2005 New Revision: 106507 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106507 Log: PR target/23424 * gcc.dg/torture/pr23424-1.c:

[Bug libfortran/24342] [4.1 regression] testsuite failure:gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 exe

2005-11-07 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-07 23:24 --- In reply to comment #1, yes. The message in the log for -O3 and -Os is now: Executing on host: /home/hp/combined/crislinux-sim/gcc/testsuite/../gfortran -B/home/hp/combined/crislinux-sim/gcc/testsuite/../ \ /home/hp

[Bug tree-optimization/20656] No strength reduction for a simple testcase

2005-11-07 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-08 00:30 --- Seen at test-case reduction also for code of the form: int i; for (i = 1; i <= shift_size; i++) { } not producing the same ICE as for: int i; i = 1 <= shift_size ? shift_size : 1; (I'll put a pointer here to t

[Bug middle-end/24750] New: [4.1 regression] global-alloc (reload) trips over own confusion for unexpected addressing modes

2005-11-08 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
ode Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: cris-axis-elf http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24750

[Bug middle-end/24750] [4.1 regression] global-alloc (reload) trips over own confusion for unexpected addressing modes

2005-11-08 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 02:23 --- I should mention that (plus:SI (sign_extend:SI (reg:HI 10 r10)) (reg:SI 1 r1)) is not a valid address, but (plus:SI (sign_extend:SI (sign_extend:SI (mem:HI (post_inc:SI (reg/f:SI 12 r12) (reg:SI 1 r1)) is

[Bug middle-end/24750] [4.1 regression] global-alloc (reload) trips over own confusion for unexpected addressing modes

2005-11-08 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 02:30 --- Created an attachment (id=10182) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10182&action=view) Compile with -Os Note the brittleness of the test-case. Apparently there's a bug, PR 20656, causi

[Bug middle-end/24750] [4.1 regression] global-alloc (reload) trips over own confusion for unexpected addressing modes

2005-11-08 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 03:17 --- Pinskia brings to attention that the loop removal thingy is more related to PR 23361. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24750

[Bug middle-end/24750] [4.1 regression] global-alloc (reload) trips over own confusion for unexpected addressing modes

2005-11-08 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 03:24 --- And to PR 18527. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24750

[Bug tree-optimization/20656] No strength reduction for a simple testcase

2005-11-08 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 03:45 --- Referring to comment #2, the test-case for PR 24750 has a few similar loops and a few other PR references that seems relevant. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20656

[Bug middle-end/24750] [4.1 regression] global-alloc (reload) trips over own confusion for unexpected addressing modes

2005-11-08 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 03:47 --- And PR 20656. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24750

[Bug middle-end/24750] [4.1 regression] global-alloc (reload) trips over own confusion for unexpected addressing modes

2005-11-09 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-10 00:47 --- A much shorter, but CRIS-specific testcase, that fails for the same reason but in a slightly different way is: int f (short *a, char *y) { asm ("" : : : "r0", "r1", "r2",

[Bug middle-end/24750] [4.1 regression] global-alloc (reload) trips over own confusion for unexpected addressing modes

2005-11-09 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-10 01:23 --- The "slightly different way" being: /tmp/st20.c: In function âfâ: /tmp/st20.c:6: internal compiler error: output_operand: unexpected index-type in cris_print_index -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_

[Bug middle-end/24750] [4.1 regression] global-alloc (reload) trips over own confusion for unexpected addressing modes

2005-11-10 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 06:03 --- Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-11/msg00790.html>. -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Ad

[Bug middle-end/24750] [4.1 regression] global-alloc (reload) trips over own confusion for unexpected addressing modes

2005-11-11 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 23:17 --- Subject: Bug 24750 Author: hp Date: Fri Nov 11 23:17:16 2005 New Revision: 106804 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106804 Log: PR middle-end/24750 *

[Bug middle-end/24750] [4.1 regression] global-alloc (reload) trips over own confusion for unexpected addressing modes

2005-11-11 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 23:19 --- Subject: Bug 24750 Author: hp Date: Fri Nov 11 23:19:26 2005 New Revision: 106806 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106806 Log: PR middle-end/24750 * gcc.dg/torture/pr2

[Bug middle-end/24750] [4.1 regression] global-alloc (reload) trips over own confusion for unexpected addressing modes

2005-11-11 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-12 00:36 --- gah -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/22469] [4.1 regression] testsuite failure, gcc.c-torture/compile/941014-2.c -O3 loops

2005-11-13 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-14 01:18 --- Fixed by unknown patch between "Wed Nov 9 10:21:03 UTC 2005 (revision 106681M)" and "Wed Nov 9 21:45:22 UTC 2005 (revision 106710M)". -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

[Bug testsuite/24841] New: dg-require compilation-test trigged on test with additional-sources barfs

2005-11-13 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
trigged on test with additional-sources barfs Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hp at

[Bug target/24842] New: testsuite failure: gcc.dg/attr-weakref-1.c execution test

2005-11-13 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
test Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hp at g

[Bug target/24842] testsuite failure: gcc.dg/attr-weakref-1.c execution test

2005-11-14 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-14 18:35 --- In response to comment #1 regarding "excess errors", see the original description: I don't get any, I just get a call to abort when the test-program is executed (as you know, the "*** EXIT code

[Bug target/24869] New: [4.1 regression] testsuite failure: gfortran.dg/func_derived_1.f90 -O3 unroll-loops

2005-11-14 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
rget AssignedTo: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: cris-axis-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24869

[Bug target/18339] testsuite failure: gcc.dg/bitfld-3.c

2005-11-14 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-15 03:54 --- Referred patch committed. -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status

[Bug rtl-optimization/20800] [4.0 regression] cris-elf testsuite failure: gcc.c-torture/execute/931004-6.c -O3

2005-11-14 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-15 03:58 --- I'm not going to hunt this down on the 4.0 branch, so I guess I'll just close it. I haven't seen it failing on the main trunk for a while. -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: W

[Bug target/20801] [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.c-torture/execute/950612-1.c compilation -O3

2005-11-14 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-15 04:01 --- I haven't seen this failing on main trunk for a while, and I'm not going to hunt it down on the 4.0 branch, so I'll just close it. -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: W

[Bug target/24869] [4.1 regression] testsuite failure: gfortran.dg/func_derived_1.f90 -O3 unroll-loops

2005-11-15 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-15 10:52 --- Subject: Bug 24869 Author: hp Date: Tue Nov 15 10:52:06 2005 New Revision: 106946 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106946 Log: PR target/24869 * config/cris

[Bug target/24869] [4.1 regression] testsuite failure: gfortran.dg/func_derived_1.f90 -O3 unroll-loops

2005-11-15 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-15 10:56 --- Fixed: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-11/msg01055.html>. -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Ad

[Bug rtl-optimization/24912] m68k build failure: ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands

2005-11-17 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-17 16:26 --- Confirmed with r107118. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24912

[Bug middle-end/24912] m68k build failure: ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands

2005-11-17 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-17 22:59 --- Reload is middle-end, not rtl-optimization. -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/24912] m68k build failure: ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands

2005-11-17 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-18 02:03 --- I have a patch under test. However, with and without that patch, *and* with and without r106804 (only with-with and without-without combinations tested), I still get with r107118 when building libgfortran: /home/hp

[Bug libfortran/24342] [4.1 regression] testsuite failure:gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 exe

2005-11-18 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-18 15:00 --- No, it's not fixed. What we fixed was a wholly different thing; a "red herring" to the problem. See comment #5. -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/24912] m68k build failure: ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands

2005-11-18 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-18 20:08 --- Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-11/msg01373.html>. -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Ad

[Bug libfortran/24342] [4.1 regression] testsuite failure:gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 exe

2005-11-18 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 07:18 --- Between "Sat Nov 12 22:59:48 UTC 2005 (revision 106840M)" and "Sun Nov 13 07:41:36 UTC 2005 (revision 106853M)" there was a changed that made the -Os case now pass, still true with "Fri

[Bug middle-end/24912] [4.1, 4.2 Regression] m68k build failure: ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands

2005-11-19 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 21:54 --- Subject: Bug 24912 Author: hp Date: Sat Nov 19 21:54:26 2005 New Revision: 107230 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107230 Log: PR middle-end/24912 * gcc.dg/torture/pr24912-

[Bug middle-end/24750] [4.1 regression] global-alloc (reload) trips over own confusion for unexpected addressing modes

2005-11-19 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 21:56 --- Subject: Bug 24750 Author: hp Date: Sat Nov 19 21:56:17 2005 New Revision: 107231 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107231 Log: PR middle-end/24912 PR middle-e

[Bug middle-end/24912] [4.1, 4.2 Regression] m68k build failure: ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands

2005-11-19 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 21:56 --- Subject: Bug 24912 Author: hp Date: Sat Nov 19 21:56:17 2005 New Revision: 107231 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107231 Log: PR middle-end/24912 PR middle-e

[Bug middle-end/24912] [4.1, 4.2 Regression] m68k build failure: ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands

2005-11-19 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 21:58 --- Subject: Bug 24912 Author: hp Date: Sat Nov 19 21:58:23 2005 New Revision: 107232 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107232 Log: PR middle-end/24912 * gcc.dg/torture/pr24912-

[Bug middle-end/24912] [4.1, 4.2 Regression] m68k build failure: ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands

2005-11-19 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 21:59 --- Subject: Bug 24912 Author: hp Date: Sat Nov 19 21:59:48 2005 New Revision: 107233 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107233 Log: PR middle-end/24912 PR middle-e

[Bug middle-end/24750] [4.1 regression] global-alloc (reload) trips over own confusion for unexpected addressing modes

2005-11-19 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 21:59 --- Subject: Bug 24750 Author: hp Date: Sat Nov 19 21:59:48 2005 New Revision: 107233 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107233 Log: PR middle-end/24912 PR middle-e

[Bug middle-end/24912] [4.1/4.2 Regression] m68k build failure: ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands

2005-11-20 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-21 03:44 --- Non-empty comment to appease bugzilla. -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/21655] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 fails

2005-11-22 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-22 19:46 --- FWIW, I can help narrowing the range of revisions: XFAILed for cris-*-* and mmix-knuth-mmixware with "Mon Nov 21 03:58:26 UTC 2005 (revision 107276M)", XPASSing since "Tue Nov 22 00:42:24 UTC 2005 (r

[Bug target/24842] testsuite failure: gcc.dg/attr-weakref-1.c execution test

2005-11-29 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-29 14:08 --- Yes, it may be a linker error. This target uses the generic linker machinery (since linking from ELF to mmo), which is not exactly the hot-path for other targets. I know of no particular way of telling *which* part of

[Bug testsuite/23304] [4.1/4.2 Regression] testsuite failures: g++.dg/ext/packed3.C, packed4.C, packed8.c and g++.dg/other/crash-4.C

2005-11-30 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-01 01:55 --- No dg-skips for targets, but I assume you mean any changes belong in the testsuite. All necessary are already in-place. See also http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg6.html>. I guess we're resolv

[Bug bootstrap/25207] New: bootstrap fails on libjava if alsa headers present but no -lasound.

2005-12-01 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
alsa headers present but no -lasound. Product: gcc Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hp at gcc d

[Bug bootstrap/25207] bootstrap fails on libjava if alsa headers present but no -lasound.

2005-12-01 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-01 16:29 --- In response to comment #1, no. The headers are provided by *both* alsa-lib-devel packages. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25207

[Bug bootstrap/25207] bootstrap fails on libjava if alsa headers present but no -lasound.

2005-12-01 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-01 18:36 --- "Aph" mentioned "green" were expected to fix it, so CC:ed. -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug bootstrap/25207] bootstrap fails on libjava if alsa headers present but no -lasound.

2005-12-01 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-01 19:42 --- Exactly! -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/25276] New: [4.2 regression] testsuite failure: execution gcc.dg/attr-weakref-1.c

2005-12-06 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: cris-axis-elf

[Bug middle-end/25276] [4.2 regression] testsuite failure: execution gcc.dg/attr-weakref-1.c

2005-12-07 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 13:20 --- I also see this on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (FC4). All targets using a combined tree (with CVS binutils). -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/25315] New: [4.2 regression] testsuite failure:27_io/basic_ostream/inserters_character/char/9555-oc.cc wchar_t/9555-oc.cc exec

2005-12-08 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
-oc.cc exec Product: gcc Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu do

[Bug target/23424] cris.md rtl canonicalization bug

2005-12-08 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-08 23:07 --- Subject: Bug 23424 Author: hp Date: Thu Dec 8 23:07:31 2005 New Revision: 108255 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108255 Log: PR target/23424 * recog.c (constrain_operands

[Bug rtl-optimization/25115] [4.2 Regression] Segmentation fault in pre_insert_copy_insn

2005-12-08 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-09 03:50 --- I see this on cris-axis-elf too, with local changes in progress of changing from cc0, causing at least: Running /home/hp/combined/combined/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/builtins.exp ... FAIL: gcc.c-torture

[Bug middle-end/25315] [4.2 regression] testsuite failure:27_io/basic_ostream/inserters_character/char/9555-oc.cc wchar_t/9555-oc.cc exec

2005-12-08 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-09 05:19 --- Comment #2 is generally wrong: a change in GCC codegen can certainly expose a coding bug in libstdc++ despite "nothing changed" there. As the bug is exposed by libstdc++, it is correct to set component t

[Bug c++/25331] FAIL: tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1/t028 cp_compat_[xy]_tst.o compile

2005-12-09 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-10 01:51 --- These FAIL introduced between "Thu Dec 8 09:08:46 UTC 2005 (revision 108221M)" and "Fri Dec 9 04:17:20 UTC 2005 (revision 108273M)" also for cris-axis-elf and cris-axis-linux-gnu, likely togethe

[Bug middle-end/25335] New: reload leaves insns from earlier passes around: fatal for postinc

2005-12-09 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet: cris-*-* http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25335

[Bug testsuite/25336] New: Identical tests: gfortran.dg/g77/20030115-1.f gfortran.dg/g77/pr9258.f

2005-12-09 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25336

[Bug middle-end/25335] [4.1/4.2 Regression] reload leaves insns from earlier passes around: fatal for postinc

2005-12-09 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-10 04:53 --- I mean for *this* test-case it's exposed by that fix. The leaving-behind of reload-insns from earlier rounds for each new reload round is general. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25335

[Bug middle-end/25335] [4.1/4.2 Regression] reload leaves insns from earlier passes around: fatal for postinc

2005-12-19 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-19 20:10 --- Incomplete analysis, can't reply to the second part of comment #3. "No" to the first part. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25335

[Bug target/22382] cris-axis-linux-gnu cross: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/common.f90 -O2 host difference?

2005-12-22 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-23 00:09 --- The generated code is indeed different between hosts, but that by itself is not the cause of the bug - there's a target bug and seemingly the same as in the other PR. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of

[Bug middle-end/24342] [4.1/4.2 regression] testsuite failure:gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 exe

2005-12-22 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-23 00:09 --- *** Bug 22382 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24342

[Bug target/24342] [4.1/4.2 regression] testsuite failure:gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 exe

2005-12-22 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-23 00:45 --- Subject: Bug 24342 Author: hp Date: Fri Dec 23 00:45:36 2005 New Revision: 108998 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108998 Log: PR target/24342 * config/cri

[Bug target/24342] [4.1/4.2 regression] testsuite failure:gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 exe

2005-12-22 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.1.0 |4.2.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24342

[Bug target/24342] [4.1/4.2 regression] testsuite failure:gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 exe

2005-12-28 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 04:27 --- Subject: Bug 24342 Author: hp Date: Thu Dec 29 04:27:24 2005 New Revision: 109137 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109137 Log: PR target/24342 * config/cri

[Bug target/24342] [4.1/4.2 regression] testsuite failure:gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 exe

2005-12-28 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #16 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 04:31 --- Fixed, 4.1 and HEAD/4.2. -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status

[Bug testsuite/25590] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loops 1

2006-01-03 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-04 00:50 --- Where it used to work for 108426 I see this for 109236 on (cross from i686-pc-linux-gnu FC2 unless otherwise noted): mips-elf sh-elf i686-pc-linux-gnu (native, FC2) cris-axis-linux-gnu cris-axis-elf mmix-knuth-mmixware

[Bug objc/25361] vectors are not encoded

2006-01-03 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-04 01:06 --- Also seen for 109236 (new test) with cross to mmix-knuth-mmixware, cris-axis-elf, cris-axis-linux-gnu, i686-pc-linux-gnu (native FC2), sh-elf, mips-elf: Running /home/hp/combined/combined/gcc/testsuite/objc.dg/gnu

[Bug libstdc++/25658] New: testsuite failure: 23_containers/deque/cons/assign/1.cc

2006-01-03 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
us: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: mmix-knuth-mmixware http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25658

[Bug rtl-optimization/25677] New: [4.2 regression] testsuite failure:gcc.c-torture/execute/960802-1.c -O1 and -O2

2006-01-04 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
NFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization AssignedTo: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: cris-axis-elf, cris-ax

[Bug rtl-optimization/25677] [4.2 regression] testsuite failure:gcc.c-torture/execute/960802-1.c -O1 and -O2

2006-01-05 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-05 15:08 --- It's still there LAST_UPDATED "Thu Jan 5 03:26:35 UTC 2006 (revision 109371M)", so I unassign myself, at least temporarily. Bonzini, a comment? -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: W

[Bug rtl-optimization/25677] [4.2 regression] testsuite failure:gcc.c-torture/execute/960802-1.c -O1 and -O2

2006-01-05 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-05 15:51 --- As offered in comment #2. Thanks! -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/25677] [4.2 regression] testsuite failure:gcc.c-torture/execute/960802-1.c -O1 and -O2

2006-01-06 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-07 00:02 --- I built and checked cross from i686-pc-linux-gnu to cris-axis-linux-gnu with this patch, and built CSiBE-2.1.1 at -O0, -O1, -O2 (note 1) and -O3 compile-time tests and -Os compile-time and size tests, with just the two

[Bug target/25706] New: [4.2 regression]: invalid asm: "mov"

2006-01-06 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
Product: gcc Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet: cris-axis-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25706

[Bug target/25706] [4.2 regression]: invalid asm: "mov"

2006-01-06 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-07 01:30 --- Created an attachment (id=10591) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10591&action=view) test-case Compile with ./cc1 -fpreprocessed -march=v10 -quiet -O2 -w -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fomi

[Bug target/25706] [4.2 regression]: invalid asm: "mov"

2006-01-06 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |hp at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug target/25718] New: invalid assembly for unsigned-minimum expressions.

2006-01-08 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
ion: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet: cris-*-* http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25718

[Bug target/25718] invalid assembly for unsigned-minimum expressions.

2006-01-08 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed

[Bug target/25718] invalid assembly for unsigned-minimum expressions.

2006-01-08 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-09 05:43 --- Forgot to mention that the revision where I repeated this was LAST_UPDATED "Thu Jan 5 03:26:35 UTC 2006 (revision 109371M)". -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25718

[Bug target/25718] invalid assembly for unsigned-minimum expressions.

2006-01-08 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2006-01-09 05:36:35 |2006-01-09 05:43

[Bug target/25718] invalid assembly for unsigned-minimum expressions.

2006-01-10 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-10 18:12 --- Subject: Bug 25718 Author: hp Date: Tue Jan 10 18:12:21 2006 New Revision: 109547 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109547 Log: PR target/25718 * config/cris/cris.md (

[Bug target/25718] invalid assembly for unsigned-minimum expressions.

2006-01-10 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-10 18:13 --- Subject: Bug 25718 Author: hp Date: Tue Jan 10 18:13:16 2006 New Revision: 109548 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109548 Log: PR target/25718 * config/cris/cris.md (

[Bug target/25718] invalid assembly for unsigned-minimum expressions.

2006-01-10 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-10 18:14 --- Subject: Bug 25718 Author: hp Date: Tue Jan 10 18:14:42 2006 New Revision: 109549 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109549 Log: PR target/25718 * gcc.dg/torture/pr25718-1.c:

[Bug target/25718] invalid assembly for unsigned-minimum expressions.

2006-01-10 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-10 19:01 --- Fixed in main trunk; 4.1 and 4.0 pending. -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/25706] [4.2 regression]: invalid asm: "mov"

2006-01-11 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-11 13:43 --- Subject: Bug 25706 Author: hp Date: Wed Jan 11 13:43:08 2006 New Revision: 109584 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109584 Log: PR target/25706 * config/cris

[Bug target/25706] [4.2 regression]: invalid asm: "mov"

2006-01-11 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-11 13:45 --- Subject: Bug 25706 Author: hp Date: Wed Jan 11 13:45:03 2006 New Revision: 109585 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109585 Log: PR target/25706 * gcc.dg/torture/pr25706-1.c:

[Bug target/25706] [4.2 regression]: invalid asm: "mov"

2006-01-11 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-11 13:51 --- . -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug testsuite/25590] [4.1/4.2 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loops 1

2006-01-16 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-17 02:02 --- Also seen on 4.1 branch, regression appearing between Fri Dec 30 21:24:33 UTC 2005 (revision 109181M) and Wed Jan 11 14:14:27 UTC 2006 (revision 109585M) for cris-axis-elf, cris-axis-linux-gnu and mmix-knuth-mmixware

[Bug libstdc++/25815] New: [4.1 regression] libstdc++ testsuite: ext/pb_assoc/example/erase_if.cc execution test

2006-01-16 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
e: ext/pb_assoc/example/erase_if.cc execution test Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc do

[Bug libstdc++/25815] [4.1 regression] libstdc++ testsuite: ext/pb_assoc/example/erase_if.cc execution test

2006-01-16 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-17 03:02 --- In response to comment #1: For the record, *all* library maintainers have access to such a system, AFAIK. I don't expect anyone to look into this, since it involves a few extra steps, some of which involve conside

[Bug libstdc++/25815] [4.1 regression] libstdc++ testsuite: ext/pb_assoc/example/erase_if.cc execution test

2006-01-19 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-19 11:17 --- Sorry, the patch in comment #3 did not help. Same error, same assertion error message. (No regressions though, tested cross to cris-elf, cris-axis-linux-gnu, mmix-knuth-mmixware.) -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed

[Bug libstdc++/25815] [4.1 regression] libstdc++ testsuite: ext/pb_assoc/example/erase_if.cc execution test

2006-01-19 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-19 11:25 --- Confirmed that compiling the test-case with -fno-strict-aliasing yields the same error. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25815

[Bug middle-end/25869] New: [4.2 regression] MMIX broken: ICE compiling __divti3

2006-01-19 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: mmix-knuth-mmixware http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25869

[Bug middle-end/25869] [4.2 regression] MMIX broken: ICE compiling __divti3

2006-01-19 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-20 05:00 --- Created an attachment (id=10682) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10682&action=view) preprocessed point of failure (gdb) show args Argument list to give program being debugged when it is sta

[Bug middle-end/25869] [4.2 regression] MMIX broken: ICE compiling __divti3

2006-01-19 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-20 05:15 --- same mmix gdb session (ignore the CFI data messages, except for DannyB ;-) (gdb) bt #0 0x0819bffc in df_chain_unlink (dflow=0x84aa3f8, ref=0x8507480, link=0x84fd06c) at /home/hp/combined/combined/gcc/df-problems.c

[Bug middle-end/25869] [4.2 regression] MMIX broken: ICE compiling __divti3

2006-01-19 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-20 05:44 --- Build succeeds for revision 110008. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25869

[Bug middle-end/25890] New: [4.2 regression] testsuite failure: gcc.c-torture/compile/20051228-1.c

2006-01-20 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
riority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: mmix-knuth-mmixware http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25890

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >