------- Comment #3 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-09 05:19 -------
Comment #2 is generally wrong: a change in GCC codegen can certainly expose a
coding bug in libstdc++ despite "nothing changed" there. As the bug is exposed
by libstdc++, it is correct to set component to "libstdc++" pending further
analysis. I guess you disagree, but by your logic the change of component to
"target" is just as wrong: there are no "target" changes for neither CRIS nor
ia64 between those revisions. Let's settle for "middle-end", ok?
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|target |middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25315
