[Bug target/115419] [avr] IEEE double round-to-nearest should go to even

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115419 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr Priority|P3

[Bug target/115419] [avr] IEEE double round-to-nearest should go to even

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115419 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/115481] HAVE_* for long double math functions wrong for avrlibc (target AVR)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115481 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to dv from comment #0) > New versions of avrlibc provide long double math functions, In the case it matters: 1) avr-libc has long double prototypes in math.h since v2.2. 2a) When long double

[Bug libstdc++/111639] HAVE_ACOSF etc. are wrong on avr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111639 --- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > since float, double and long double all seem to be the same size on avr Not necessarily. Since GCC v10, the default for long double is 64 bit (IEEE double)

[Bug rtl-optimization/115523] New: [avr] Remove SFmode insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115523 Bug ID: 115523 Summary: [avr] Remove SFmode insns Product: gcc Version: 14.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug rtl-optimization/115523] [avr] Remove SFmode insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115523 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay --- That bloat can be worked around by taking away the SFmode insns in avr.md.

[Bug c/86869] ICE when taking address of array member of __memx struct pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86869 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.0|14.1

[Bug rtl-optimization/115523] [avr] Remove SFmode insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115523 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Andrew, in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114243#c2 you wrote that the issue is going to be fixed for RISC-V. You have a PR for that, and what's the state of it?

[Bug rtl-optimization/114243] [13/14/15 Regression][avr] -fsplit-wide-types bloats code by more than 50%

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114243 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/114243] [13/14/15 Regression][avr] -fsplit-wide-types bloats code by more than 50%

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114243 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Created attachment 58483 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58483&action=edit sfmode.c: C test case This is a test case with simpler functions like float add2 (float a, float b) {

[Bug rtl-optimization/115717] New: volatile store hampering unrelated optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115717 Bug ID: 115717 Summary: volatile store hampering unrelated optimization Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/115726] New: [avr] Wrong code with __memx and local register variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115726 Bug ID: 115726 Summary: [avr] Wrong code with __memx and local register variables Product: gcc Version: 14.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug target/115726] [avr] Wrong code with __memx and local register variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115726 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Keywords|

[Bug target/115726] [avr] Wrong code with __memx and local register variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115726 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > It seems to work on x86_64 for It's an AVR issue and how avr.md::mov is expanding loads from 24-bit address-space.

[Bug target/115726] [avr] Wrong code with __memx and local register variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115726 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/88236] [avr] Invalid code generated for __memx char pointer deference for avr5 arch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88236 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.2 Resolution|---

[Bug target/86635] [avr] Miscompilation with __memx and libgcc float function __gtsf2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86635 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/115726] [avr] Wrong code with __memx and local register variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115726 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||saaadhu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug target/87376] [avr] Miscompilation with __memx and long long addition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87376 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|DUPLICATE

[Bug target/87376] [avr] Miscompilation with __memx and long long addition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87376 --- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay --- I have no idea how to fix this one. The problem is that the DImode move is being expanded into 8 x QImode loads from memx, and there is no way to do stuff similar to PR115726 because we do not have movdi

[Bug target/115733] New: [avr] Improve __memx address handling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115733 Bug ID: 115733 Summary: [avr] Improve __memx address handling Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/115733] [avr] Improve __memx address handling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115733 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Priority|P3

[Bug target/115733] [avr] Improve __memx address handling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115733 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Created attachment 58559 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58559&action=edit proposed patch AVR: target/115733 - Improve __memx address handling. Allow CONSTANT_ADDRESS_P addresses in

[Bug target/98762] [avr] Wrong code for avrtiny for QImode loads from Z to R31

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98762 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/87376] [avr] Miscompilation with __memx and long long addition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87376 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/54071] out data in object file is correct only for -s0 optimize flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54071 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/78275] [avr] at43usb320 in wrong multilib set.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78275 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/115817] [AVR] Suboptimal code for zeroing SRAM byte from ISR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115817 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/115825] New: Loop unrolling increases code size with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115825 Bug ID: 115825 Summary: Loop unrolling increases code size with -Os Product: gcc Version: 14.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tr

[Bug tree-optimization/115825] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Loop unrolling increases code size with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115825 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay --- How is the tree-ssa passes quering the costs? Does it bake RTX patterns, or is it again some implicit assumptions without looking at actual (estimated) real costs?

[Bug tree-optimization/115828] New: Inefficient loop termination (should use compare against 0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115828 Bug ID: 115828 Summary: Inefficient loop termination (should use compare against 0) Product: gcc Version: 14.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/115817] [AVR] Suboptimal code for zeroing SRAM byte from ISR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115817 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Setting R1 to 0 in an ISR prologue is not redundant, because R1 may be non-zero due to a variety of reasons, for example when the interrupted code uses MUL just to mention one. Moreover, on Reduced Tiny

[Bug target/115830] New: [avr] Make better use of SREG in conditional jumps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115830 Bug ID: 115830 Summary: [avr] Make better use of SREG in conditional jumps Product: gcc Version: 14.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug target/115830] [avr] Make better use of SREG in conditional jumps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115830 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug tree-optimization/115828] Inefficient loop termination (should use compare against 0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115828 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Turning off ivopts `-fno-ivopts`. avr gives: > .L2: > sts v+1,r19 > sts v,r18 > subi r18,2 > sbc r19,__zero_reg__ > sb

[Bug tree-optimization/115825] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Loop unrolling increases code size with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115825 --- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Created attachment 58624 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58624&action=edit unroll-Os.c.182t.cunroll (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > can you paste more context from the

[Bug tree-optimization/115825] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Loop unrolling increases code size with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115825 --- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Created attachment 58625 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58625&action=edit unroll-Os.c.112t.cunrolli (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > can you paste more context from th

[Bug target/115893] AVR documentation in x86_64 build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115893 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay --- A native build on x86_64 produces warnings about avr documentation.(In reply to David Binderman from comment #0) > A native build on x86_64 produces warnings about avr documentation. This is an issue in

[Bug target/115893] AVR documentation in x86_64 build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115893 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #2) > IMHO, an x86_64 build shouldn't be doing *anything* with any avr > documentation. The GCC user documentation as well as the Internals manual covers all targ

[Bug rtl-optimization/56479] Register allocator can't allocate two 4-byte variables into 8 registers for inline asm on avr-gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56479 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.7.2 |14.1.0 Last reconfirmed|2013-03-02

[Bug target/90616] Suboptimal code generated for accessing an aligned array.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90616 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Build|amd64-portbld-freebsd10.4 | Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/18065] usual arithmetic conversion are sub-optimal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18065 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2005-05-01 04:18:52 |2024-7-18 Summary|usual ar

[Bug target/89270] [12/13 regression] AVR ICE: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89270 --- Comment #16 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #14) > Fixed on trunk sofar. Joseph correctly mentioned that iff AVR would define > __int24 using INT_N in avr-modes.def the issue would have been mitigated as >

[Bug target/116056] New: [avr] Add support for __attribute__((signal(n)))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116056 Bug ID: 116056 Summary: [avr] Add support for __attribute__((signal(n))) Product: gcc Version: 14.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug target/116056] [avr] Add support for __attribute__((signal(n)))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116056 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Target|

[Bug target/116056] [avr] Add support for __attribute__((signal(n)))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116056 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/64053] asm labels to accept extra parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64053 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug target/116056] [avr] Add support for __attribute__((signal(n)))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116056 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eugene at hutorny dot in.ua --- Comm

[Bug target/97276] A whole if-block is ignored by avr-gcc 9.3.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97276 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|WAITING

[Bug target/116953] [avr] error: operands to %T/%t must be reg + const_int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116953 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/116550] [lra][avr] internal compiler error: in final_scan_insn_1, at final.cc:2807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116550 --- Comment #17 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to denisc from comment #15) > I sent a patch. What might help is to CC the respective maintainer as listed in MAINTAINERS.

[Bug rtl-optimization/116780] [lra][avr] internal compiler error: output_operand: address operand requires constraint for X, Y, or Z register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116780 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Maybe this one is related to the fact that LRA doesn't set strict when it is in strict-RTL mode? For example, with your latest test case: $avr-gcc foo.c -S -mlra -O1 -mmcu=atmega128 -fdump-rtl-final -ml

[Bug rtl-optimization/116780] [lra][avr] internal compiler error: output_operand: address operand requires constraint for X, Y, or Z register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116780 --- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay --- ...hmmm https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html reads: 6.18 Arrays of Length Zero Declaring zero-length arrays is allowed in GNU C as an extension. A zero-length array can be useful as the

[Bug rtl-optimization/116780] [lra][avr] internal compiler error: output_operand: address operand requires constraint for X, Y, or Z register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116780 --- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #8) > That is invalid C code, of course (an out of bounds access). What about the other test case https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59148 ? That'

[Bug rtl-optimization/116780] [lra][avr] internal compiler error: output_operand: address operand requires constraint for X, Y, or Z register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116780 --- Comment #14 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #13) > But this testcase is in gcc.target/ anyway, right? That's just a copy of gcc.dg/torture/pr64088.c : https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=gcc/t

[Bug target/116953] [avr] error: operands to %T/%t must be reg + const_int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116953 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-10-21 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug rtl-optimization/116550] [lra][avr] internal compiler error: in final_scan_insn_1, at final.cc:2807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116550 --- Comment #25 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to denisc from comment #24) > Johann do you think that it is better to open a new bug for lra-pr116550-2.c Yes, seems to be a different issue.

[Bug rtl-optimization/116550] [lra][avr] internal compiler error: in final_scan_insn_1, at final.cc:2807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116550 --- Comment #22 from Georg-Johann Lay --- I allowed me to add some test cases. Unfortunatels, one of them is failing with the patch and -mlra, whereas is passes with -mno-lra. In $builddir/gcc: $ make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board

[Bug rtl-optimization/116550] [lra][avr] internal compiler error: in final_scan_insn_1, at final.cc:2807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116550 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/113934] Switch avr to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113934 Bug 113934 depends on bug 116550, which changed state. Bug 116550 Summary: [lra][avr] internal compiler error: in final_scan_insn_1, at final.cc:2807 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116550 What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/56183] [meta-bug][avr] Problems with register allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56183 Bug 56183 depends on bug 116550, which changed state. Bug 116550 Summary: [lra][avr] internal compiler error: in final_scan_insn_1, at final.cc:2807 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116550 What|Removed

[Bug target/113934] Switch avr to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113934 Bug 113934 depends on bug 116779, which changed state. Bug 116779 Summary: [lra][avr] internal compiler error: in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.cc:1303 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116779 What|Removed

[Bug rtl-optimization/116779] [lra][avr] internal compiler error: in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.cc:1303

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116779 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/117191] [avr][dse2][lra] wrong dead store elimination

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117191 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay --- *** Bug 116779 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug middle-end/56183] [meta-bug][avr] Problems with register allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56183 Bug 56183 depends on bug 116779, which changed state. Bug 116779 Summary: [lra][avr] internal compiler error: in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.cc:1303 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116779 What|Removed

[Bug rtl-optimization/116550] [lra][avr] internal compiler error: in final_scan_insn_1, at final.cc:2807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116550 --- Comment #11 from Georg-Johann Lay --- There's PR116778 that also produces wrong code; maybe it's the same issue -- but easier to analyse. At least for that PR the bad insn is already known.

[Bug rtl-optimization/116780] [lra][avr] internal compiler error: output_operand: address operand requires constraint for X, Y, or Z register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116780 --- Comment #16 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #15) > It makes sense never, not on any target, not with LRA nor without. Though there are test cases that are UB and valid as I just learned some weeks ago.

[Bug c/41045] Extended asm with C operands doesn’t work at top level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41045 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2009-11-22 20:00:11 |2024-10-25 --- Comment #13 from Georg

[Bug rtl-optimization/117191] [avr][dse2][lra] wrong dead store elimination

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117191 --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay --- In the case you are wondering: Thes test case has been renamed to gcc.target/avr/torture/pr117191.c some days ago.

[Bug rtl-optimization/116550] [lra][avr] internal compiler error: in final_scan_insn_1, at final.cc:2807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116550 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #59196|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug rtl-optimization/116550] [lra][avr] internal compiler error: in final_scan_insn_1, at final.cc:2807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116550 --- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Though it seems there are also new execution FAILs: $ make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=atmega128-sim --tool_opts=-mlra execute.exp=simd-[12].c -all" Running /home/john/xgnu/source/gcc-mast

[Bug rtl-optimization/116550] [lra][avr] internal compiler error: in final_scan_insn_1, at final.cc:2807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116550 --- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay --- The gcc.c-torture/execute/simd-[12].c tests PASS with -mno-lra but are FAILing with -mlra. Without your patch there are some ICEs, with your patch it's only execution FAILs.

[Bug rtl-optimization/116550] [lra][avr] internal compiler error: in final_scan_insn_1, at final.cc:2807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116550 --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Created attachment 59196 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59196&action=edit diff-test.txt: avr testsuite delta (In reply to denisc from comment #2) > Johan can you test the patch ? On

[Bug rtl-optimization/116550] [lra][avr] internal compiler error: in final_scan_insn_1, at final.cc:2807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116550 --- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay --- ...I am stuck here. When I am testing locally, a single test like $ make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=atmega128-sim --tool_opts=-mlra compile.exp=2009-1.c -all" works fine, but on the

[Bug rtl-optimization/116781] New: [lra][avr] internal compiler error: in cselib_invalidate_regno, at cselib.cc:2545

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116781 Bug ID: 116781 Summary: [lra][avr] internal compiler error: in cselib_invalidate_regno, at cselib.cc:2545 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug rtl-optimization/116781] [lra][avr] internal compiler error: in cselib_invalidate_regno, at cselib.cc:2545

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116781 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, ra Ever confi

[Bug target/113932] [meta-bug] Targets which should be ported to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113932 Bug 113932 depends on bug 116326, which changed state. Bug 116326 Summary: [lra] internal compiler error: in get_reload_reg, at lra-constraints.cc:755 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116326 What|Removed

[Bug target/113934] Switch avr to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113934 Bug 113934 depends on bug 116326, which changed state. Bug 116326 Summary: [lra] internal compiler error: in get_reload_reg, at lra-constraints.cc:755 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116326 What|Removed

[Bug target/113932] [meta-bug] Targets which should be ported to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113932 Bug 113932 depends on bug 116324, which changed state. Bug 116324 Summary: [lra] error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm' https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116324 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug rtl-optimization/116326] [lra] internal compiler error: in get_reload_reg, at lra-constraints.cc:755

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116326 --- Comment #14 from Georg-Johann Lay --- *** Bug 116324 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/116324] [lra] error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116324 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/116325] [lra] ICE: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.cc:4283

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116325 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/113932] [meta-bug] Targets which should be ported to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113932 Bug 113932 depends on bug 116325, which changed state. Bug 116325 Summary: [lra] ICE: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.cc:4283 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116325 What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/116326] [lra] internal compiler error: in get_reload_reg, at lra-constraints.cc:755

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116326 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/56183] [meta-bug][avr] Problems with register allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56183 Bug 56183 depends on bug 116326, which changed state. Bug 116326 Summary: [lra] internal compiler error: in get_reload_reg, at lra-constraints.cc:755 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116326 What|Removed

[Bug target/113934] Switch avr to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113934 Bug 113934 depends on bug 116324, which changed state. Bug 116324 Summary: [lra] error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm' https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116324 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug middle-end/56183] [meta-bug][avr] Problems with register allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56183 Bug 56183 depends on bug 116324, which changed state. Bug 116324 Summary: [lra] error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm' https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116324 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/116326] [lra] internal compiler error: in get_reload_reg, at lra-constraints.cc:755

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116326 --- Comment #15 from Georg-Johann Lay --- *** Bug 116325 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug middle-end/56183] [meta-bug][avr] Problems with register allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56183 Bug 56183 depends on bug 116325, which changed state. Bug 116325 Summary: [lra] ICE: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.cc:4283 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116325 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/113934] Switch avr to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113934 Bug 113934 depends on bug 116325, which changed state. Bug 116325 Summary: [lra] ICE: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.cc:4283 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116325 What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/116389] [15 regression] [avr] ICE in extract_constrain_insn for avrtiny and -O2 with ext-dce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116389 --- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay --- As it appears, this ICE only occurs with reload (-mno-lra) but not with LRA (-mlra). Provided PR116326 is fixed.

[Bug rtl-optimization/116778] [lra][avr] Wrong code with -mlra (bitfld-lra.c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116778 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay --- ...and without -mlra the code is correct, so likely caused by LRA.

[Bug rtl-optimization/116778] [lra][avr] Wrong code with -mlra (bitfld-lra.c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116778 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/116778] New: [lra][avr] Wrong code with -mlra (bitfld-lra.c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116778 Bug ID: 116778 Summary: [lra][avr] Wrong code with -mlra (bitfld-lra.c) Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug rtl-optimization/116780] New: [lra][avr] internal compiler error: output_operand: address operand requires constraint for X, Y, or Z register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116780 Bug ID: 116780 Summary: [lra][avr] internal compiler error: output_operand: address operand requires constraint for X, Y, or Z register Product: gcc Version: 15.

[Bug rtl-optimization/116780] [lra][avr] internal compiler error: output_operand: address operand requires constraint for X, Y, or Z register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116780 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Blocks|

[Bug tree-optimization/116779] New: [lra][avr] internal compiler error: in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.cc:1303

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116779 Bug ID: 116779 Summary: [lra][avr] internal compiler error: in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.cc:1303 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug tree-optimization/116779] [lra][avr] internal compiler error: in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.cc:1303

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116779 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr CC|

[Bug target/116953] New: [avr] error: operands to %T/%t must be reg + const_int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116953 Bug ID: 116953 Summary: [avr] error: operands to %T/%t must be reg + const_int Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug target/116953] [avr] error: operands to %T/%t must be reg + const_int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116953 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >