--- Comment #5 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2006-04-06 12:23
---
Subject: Re: When using excessive -ftemplate-depth g++ overflows the stack
"gcc at magfr dot user dot lysator dot liu dot se" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
| The standard says the limit have
--- Comment #7 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2006-04-06 13:09
---
Subject: Re: When using excessive -ftemplate-depth g++ overflows the stack
"gcc at magfr dot user dot lysator dot liu dot se" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
| ( As an aside that suggests that
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-04-27 13:37 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] ICE in in gen_split_1204 on i686-pc-linux-gnu
target
"rgrosseboerger at dspace dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The proposed patch fixes the redu
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-04-30 21:50 ---
Subject: Re: Configuring g++ library for various locales ?
"pcarlini at suse dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| For that kind of GNU x86-linux platform we have, literal
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-04-30 22:16 ---
Subject: Re: Configuring g++ library for various locales ?
"pcarlini at suse dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > I understand that bugzilla is not a hotline, but we would
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-01 05:21 ---
Subject: Re: __attribute__((deprecated)) not useful on classes, and ugly
function name listed for deperecation warnings on constructor
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTE
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-02 13:27 ---
Subject: Re: Lack of Posix compliant thread safety in std::basic_string
"pcarlini at suse dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Two quick comments: 1- I'd like to keep open
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-02 14:09 ---
Subject: Re: Lack of Posix compliant thread safety in std::basic_string
"pcarlini at suse dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| --- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse do
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-02 16:40 ---
Subject: Re: Lack of Posix compliant thread safety in std::basic_string
"rittle at latour dot waar dot labs dot mot dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Subject: Re: New: Lack of
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-02 17:17 ---
Subject: Re: Lack of Posix compliant thread safety in std::basic_string
"pcarlini at suse dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| --- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse do
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-02 18:45 ---
Subject: Re: Lack of Posix compliant thread safety in std::basic_string
"pcarlini at suse dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| --- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse do
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-02 19:09 ---
Subject: Re: Empty declaration with typeof accepted
"bangerth at dealii dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Confirmed. Funny enough, icc accepts the code as well...
would th
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-03 15:24 ---
Subject: Re: configure reports only a warning when bison is not installed
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Are you building from the source tarball o
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-03 15:43 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] build now requires bision
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-04 12:12 ---
Subject: Re: Lack of Posix compliant thread safety in std::basic_string
"jkanze at cheuvreux dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| This bug report came about because of a
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-15 16:47 ---
Subject: Re: cp_binding_level::names not returning all decls
"sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| (In reply to comment #9)
| > only if it may be
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-16 00:14 ---
Subject: Re: static_cast falsely allows const to be cast away
"schlie at comcast dot net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| --- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-16 02:54 ---
Subject: Re: static_cast falsely allows const to be cast away
"schlie at comcast dot net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| --- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-16 09:07 ---
Subject: Re: static_cast falsely allows const to be cast away
"schlie at comcast dot net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| --- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-16 17:00 ---
Subject: Re: static_cast falsely allows const to be cast away
"schlie at comcast dot net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| (In reply to comment #9)
| Subject: Re: static_cast falsely
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-16 19:19 ---
Subject: Re: Possible bug
"sven at clio dot in-berlin dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| (In reply to comment #7)
| > > Is there a way to distinguish between unions (w
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-18 14:04 ---
Subject: Re: templates and anonymous enum
"papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| Therefore:
|
| * Concerning 1.a) and 1.b) I'm not convinced th
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-18 15:07 ---
Subject: Re: [DR 278] templates and anonymous enum
"papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I guess what I meant is: whatever the reason for this error messag
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-18 17:08 ---
Subject: Re: [DR 278] templates and anonymous enum
"pcarlini at suse dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > .. The error message shoudl really point at what's wron
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-19 19:45 ---
Subject: Re: New: array-of-empty-structure extension not properly defined
"rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| For
|
| struct {} a[4]; int main() { ret
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-19 23:27 ---
Subject: Re: Loses temporary in complex expression
"igodard at pacbell dot net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Yes, the friend function is returning a reference to its own argumen
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-19 23:31 ---
Subject: Re: Loses temporary in complex expression
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-19 23:35 ---
Subject: Re: Loses temporary in complex expression
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Here is another example where we don't know for sure it shows h
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-20 00:12 ---
Subject: Re: Loses temporary in complex expression
"igodard at pacbell dot net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| In particular, once you get all the template armwaving out of it:
|
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-20 00:15 ---
Subject: Re: Loses temporary in complex expression
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| (In reply to comment #9)
| > And we can construct more. But i
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-21 18:32 ---
Subject: Re: No flag to turn off warning: warning: template-argument
`' uses anonymous type
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| --- Additional
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-21 21:42 ---
Subject: Re: wrong-code with inlining and type-punned pointer
"schlie at comcast dot net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| (In reply to comment #4)
| > Subject: Re: wrong-code wit
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-22 10:32 ---
Subject: Re: call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous
"pcarlini at suse dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Gaby, can you have a look?
Yup. Just woke up and many peopl
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-22 15:35 ---
Subject: Re: MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| What about using PATH_MAX which is part of the POSIX standard?
I
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-31 11:16 ---
Subject: Re: New: C++/C99 standard violation in for loop
"ahelm at gmx dot net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| C++ standard quote:
|
| 3.3.2, paragraph 4:
| Names declared in the fo
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-06-06 14:50 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.1 regression] pretty printer confusion
"reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The error message reads:
|
| bug.cc: In function &
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-06-12 23:35 ---
Subject: Re: Built-in functions not marked as such
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Any news on this because nobody understand this bug except for th
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-12-15 20:16 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3 Regression] virtual memory exhausted
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I let GDR decide if he wants this patch to fix it for 3.3.x.
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-12-16 02:36 ---
Subject: Re: UCNs not recognized in identifiers (c++/c99)
"zack at codesourcery dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Joseph Myers insists that this situation cannot arise, bec
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-12-16 14:05 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3 Regression] ice-on-invalid-code, ICE while compiling ({})
expression
"reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Bootstrapped and regtest
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-12-19 15:31 ---
Subject: Re: cp_namespace_decl not returning all decls
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I think -fdump-translation-unit should be removed, it is only
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-12-21 19:27 ---
Subject: Re: ("foo") accepted as char[] initializer
"nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| 2004-12-16 Nathan Sidwell <[EMAIL PROTEC
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-12-23 14:42 ---
Subject: Re: memory consumption for heavy template instantiations tripled
since 3.3
"steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| Maybe buffer should not be
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-12-23 20:30 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0 regression] local classes as template argument
I agree with your analysis. Thanks for the time you put into this.
I record it for future references in EWG.
-- Gaby
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-12-29 18:54 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] ICE on zero-length array with empty
initializer...
"mark at codesourcery dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > As for designated_index, t
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-12-29 18:57 ---
Subject: Re: New: __attribute__((aligned)) not working in template
"pcarlini at suse dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Unfortunately, it looks like even the very limited function
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-12-29 19:01 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure:
gcc.c-torture/compile/20031023-4.c -O0, -O1
"giovannibajo at libero dot it" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writ
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-02 00:43 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a
reference to a temporary
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| (In reply to comment #
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-05 21:17 ---
Subject: Re: wrong code due to name import from the implementation of the
standard library
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| This is a dup of bug 6257
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-07 14:27 ---
Subject: Re: UCNs not recognized in identifiers (c++/c99)
"joseph at codesourcery dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I've had no on-list response yet to the query abo
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-07 15:39 ---
Subject: Re: UCNs not recognized in identifiers (c++/c99)
"joseph at codesourcery dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I've now sent it to c++std-compat (having checked
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-08 04:45 ---
Subject: Re: UCNs not recognized in identifiers (c++/c99)
"joseph at codesourcery dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Subject: Re: UCNs not recognized in identifiers
| (c++/c99
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-08 04:47 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] [ia64] Extra '.restore sp' in tail call
"wilson at specifixinc dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > according to http://bugs
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-08 16:53 ---
Subject: Re: GCC 3.3/Irix 6.5 union as vararg not passed correctly
"rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Just to confirm that the testcase fails with 3.3.
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-09 03:20 ---
Subject: Re: UCNs not recognized in identifiers (c++/c99)
"joseph at codesourcery dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| --- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-10 04:39 ---
Subject: Re: No more possible to have a template function that uses a nested
class of a template class
"jean-pierre dot chevallet at imag dot fr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| &
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-11 19:46 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] [ia64] Extra '.restore sp' in tail call
"wilson at specifixinc dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4/4.
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-11 19:48 ---
Subject: Re: New: Including STL headers in a namespace doesn't compile
"JurgenvonOerthel at hotmail dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The following code doesn't c
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-12 17:05 ---
Subject: Re: Trivial loop not unrolled
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Really -funroll-loops should be added to -O3 by default and maybe a
| tweewed ve
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-12 17:06 ---
Subject: Re: Trivial loop not unrolled
"rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Or stuff often found in C++ libraries:
|
| template
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-12 19:37 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] name lookup is broken with friends
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| : Search converges between 2004-11-25-014001-trunk (#6
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-13 13:27 ---
Subject: Re: std::isnan<>() is broken on FreeBSD
"pcarlini at suse dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Gaby, can you spot something fundamentally wrong in the proposed pa
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-14 03:18 ---
Subject: Re: std::isnan<>() is broken on FreeBSD
"pcarlini at suse dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Eric Botcazou reported privately that the patch doesn't intro
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-14 16:06 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] name lookup is broken with friends
"Woebbeking at web dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] name lookup is broken with
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-14 16:10 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] name lookup is broken with friends
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| (In reply to comment #2)
| > Excuse me?
|
| You
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-18 13:40 ---
Subject: Re: New: Parsing problem in the constructor call of temporary object
"timo dot erkkila at tut dot fi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hello,
|
| the following cod
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-18 21:02 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.0 regression] Warning using list iterators
"reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Compiling the following code snippet with "-Wal
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-18 21:46 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] Warning using list iterators
"pcarlini at suse dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > I think your patch is OK and should be applied.
|
| First bl
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-19 15:57 ---
Subject: Re: basic_string::_M_rep() can produce an unnaturally aligned pointer
to _Rep
"pcarlini at suse dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Does this behaviour seem a little
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-19 16:02 ---
Subject: Re: basic_string::_M_rep() can produce an unnaturally aligned pointer
to _Rep
"pcarlini at suse dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Well, I can see that basic_string d
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-20 04:08 ---
Subject: Re: basic_string::_M_rep() can produce an unnaturally aligned pointer
to _Rep
"pcarlini at suse dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| This is way I'm proposing, *for 4
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-20 19:19 ---
Subject: Re: New: Difference in behaviour if default constructor added
"chris at bubblescope dot net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| While looking at PR 19510, I noticed the follo
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-20 19:42 ---
Subject: Re: Difference in behaviour if default constructor added
"chris at bubblescope dot net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I'm still curious as to why the error do
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-21 02:25 ---
Subject: Re: Difference in behaviour if default constructor added
"bangerth at dealii dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| To be completely clear, the compiler generated defaul
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-21 02:28 ---
Subject: Re: Difference in behaviour if default constructor added
"caj at cs dot york dot ac dot uk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Subject: Re: Difference in behaviour if def
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-21 15:33 ---
Subject: Re: New: reverse_iterator comparison
"kunert at physik dot tu-dresden dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| This code does not compile:
|
| #include
| using namespace s
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-25 15:53 ---
Subject: Re: New: exception not caught when passing through C code
"jkanze at cheuvreux dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| When an exception is thrown, terminate is called, eve
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-28 07:17 ---
Subject: Re: New: [FEATURE REQUEST] Need an option preventing any atexit
object destructions
"yuri at tsoft dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| For ex. "gcc -no-atexit ...
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-28 22:41 ---
Subject: Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] Need an option preventing any atexit object
destructions
"yuri at tsoft dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > If your objects are sim
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-02-01 10:40 ---
Subject: Re: New: typename requirement error
"gianni at mariani dot ws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| In a recent posting by Daveed Vandervoorde on comp.std.c++, apparently the
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-02-01 10:42 ---
Subject: Re: typename requirement error
"gianni at mariani dot ws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| BTW - gcc version 3.2.2 20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-5) accepts the
| code,
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-02-01 15:57 ---
Subject: Re: gcjh generates invalid class member floating-point initialisers
"rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| A patch to avoid this error is
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-02-01 16:00 ---
Subject: Re: gcjh generates invalid class member floating-point initialisers
"giovannibajo at libero dot it" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| In fact, I personally use this to
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-02-01 16:02 ---
Subject: Re: Grammar "error" in error message.
"steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Andrew is a native speaker. Really, he is. ;-)
|
| Anyway,
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-02-01 16:04 ---
Subject: Re: suboptimal error message for template functions (as opposed to
non-templates)
"bangerth at dealii dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| This is in fact true. The
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-08-03 13:01
---
Subject: Re: can't compile self defined void distance(std::vector, std::vector)
"giovannibajo at libero dot it" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| --- Additional Comments From g
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-11-22 15:06 ---
Subject: Re: --std=f would be nice
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Oh, by the way how can they trademark a single letter.
Ignorance?
-- G
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-11-22 15:42 ---
Subject: Re: bad error message
"bangerth at dealii dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I think the fact that we may print a message saying that the overload
| set is empty bu
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-11-26 03:16 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] -Wsynth warning in
"bangerth at dealii dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I am not an expert in ABI questions, but in my naive world con
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-11-26 17:45 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] -Wsynth warning in
"bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > The diagnostic is nonsensical. The fix is to fix
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-11-27 21:27 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] -Wsynth warning in
"bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Why are we getting this warning anyway?
I don't know w
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-11-30 11:46 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0 Regression] Alternate "asm" name ignored for redeclared
builtin function imported into namespace std
"austern at apple dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-12-09 16:03 ---
Subject: Re: Naive (default) complex division algorithm
"joseph at codesourcery dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| --- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-12-09 16:38 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4 regression] array initialization in struct construct is
a memory hog
"nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Same fix for 3.3 branch
| 20
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-12-10 04:36 ---
Subject: Re: Incorrect lookup for parameters
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| --- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-12-10 16:53 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] RDIV_EXPR not supported by dump_expr
"reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Gaby, is this trivial patch OK for the 3.3 bran
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-12-11 19:57 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] ICE in in gen_split_1204 on i686-pc-linux-gnu
target
"rgrosseboerger at dspace dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| --
|
--- Comment #21 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2006-10-24 06:18
---
Subject: Re: g++ miscompiles gcjx
"pcarlini at suse dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Gaby, any news about this issue?
gcjx has been declared dead. I never got to have the issue fix
--- Comment #6 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2006-10-24 06:32
---
Subject: Re: New: Issues with -Wchar-subscripts
"h dot b dot furuseth at usit dot uio dot no" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
| [This is both a C and C++ bug report, not sure how to classify t
--- Comment #24 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2006-10-24 06:53
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] placement new does not change the
dynamic type as it should
"mark at codesourcery dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| --- Comment #22 from mark
301 - 400 of 1275 matches
Mail list logo
