------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-01-18 21:02 ------- Subject: Re: New: [4.0 regression] Warning using list iterators
"reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Compiling the following code snippet with "-Wall -O3" using mainline | | =============================================== | #include<vector> | #include<list> | | std::vector<std::list<int>::iterator> v(1); | =============================================== | | I get the following warning: | | /long_path/stl_construct.h: In function 'void | __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int)': | /long_path/stl_construct.h:81: warning: 'SR.133' is used uninitialized in this | function | | Apart from the strange variable name 'SR.133' the warning seems to be | justified as the default constructor of _List_iterator does not initialize | the pointer _M_node. _List_const_iterator has the same problem. That strange warning would be greatly useful if SRA names were not used. They make the diagnostic rather cryptic and noisy. I think your patch is OK and should be applied. -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19510
