Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: native, plateform
--- Additional Comments From gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2004-11-03 00:28 ---
Subject: Re: Test failures due to missing C99 symbols
"bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Simple grep:
|
| /include/std/std_complex.h: __complex_arg(__complex__ flo
--- Comment #5 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-20 01:04 ---
Subject: Bug 8586
Author: gdr
Date: Mon Nov 20 01:03:49 2006
New Revision: 119009
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=119009
Log:
2006-11-19 Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #2 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2006-12-14 16:30 ---
Subject: Re: C++ front-end rejects valid compound literal (with complex types)
"rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Even
|
| _Complex double foo (double x)
| {
| return
--- Comment #5 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2006-12-18 10:16 ---
Subject: Re: New: -O2 generates bad code
"dcb314 at hotmail dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I compiled the following C++ code on a x86_64 machine
| without optimisation.
|
| #include
--- Comment #6 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2006-12-18 10:58 ---
Subject: Re: -O2 generates bad code
"dcb314 at hotmail dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > then it can only be postive
|
| Plausible, but I don't think so.
In that case, you
--- Comment #6 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-30 17:52 ---
user mistaken.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #2 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-30 18:42 ---
indeed a bug.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #3 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-30 18:54 ---
As noted by pinskia, this really is a linker option as opposed
to front-end option.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-30 19:00 ---
I can reproduce this.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #5 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-30 19:40 ---
Thsi is indeed a bug in g++.
the pod() in inherit() is a value-initialization, not a call to
default-constructor.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: platform independent
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30334
--- Comment #1 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-30 19:52 ---
working on a patch.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo
--- Comment #7 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2007-01-15 16:14 ---
Subject: Re: [regression] -Wconversion triggers warnings for
deque<>::push_back()
"pcarlini at suse dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| (In reply to comment #5)
| > Sorry I read your reply
--- Comment #14 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2007-01-16 18:01 ---
Subject: Re: Integer Overflow detection code optimised away, -fwrapv broken
"rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| We do weight between cost and result which is a reason we
--- Comment #14 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2007-01-17 00:59 ---
Subject: Re: unsigned warning in template
"manu at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| #include
| template
| void f(Int x) {
| assert(0 <= x and x <= D);
| }
| int main
--- Comment #16 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2007-01-17 01:30 ---
Subject: Re: unsigned warning in template
"manu at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| (In reply to comment #14)
| > | We don't emit a warning when instantiated as a si
--- Comment #18 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2007-01-17 01:46 ---
Subject: Re: unsigned warning in template
"tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| A flag to control the warning does not provide
| fine enough granularity of control.
Ind
--- Comment #10 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2007-01-17 11:09 ---
Subject: Re: [regression] -Wconversion triggers warnings for
deque<>::push_back()
"pcarlini at suse dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Gaby, any news about the signed <-> unsigned war
--- Comment #21 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2007-01-17 13:47 ---
Subject: Re: unsigned warning in template
"tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > The particularity of such expressions is that they are constants.
|
| I've though
--- Comment #7 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2007-01-17 14:06 ---
Subject: Re: Request for -Wundefined
"manu at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Perhaps Wundefined should warn for PR 29465 ?
Where feasable with minimum overhead, yes.
-- G
--- Comment #8 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2007-01-17 14:08 ---
Subject: Re: Request for -Wundefined
"manu at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Also, not sure whether Wundefined or Wsequence-points should handle PR 24016.
"unspecified beahv
--- Comment #9 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2007-01-17 14:09 ---
Subject: Re: Request for -Wundefined
"manu at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Another candidate is PR 30457.
agreed.
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30334
--- Comment #10 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2007-01-17 14:26 ---
Subject: Re: Request for -Wundefined
"manu at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Not so sure about this one PR 12411
order of evaluation is "unspecified", should go
--- Comment #11 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2007-01-17 14:29 ---
Subject: Re: Request for -Wundefined
"manu at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Not sure about this one either, there seems to be a warning in C++
| but I am not sure what option con
--- Comment #36 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 02:37 ---
A fix is not going to happen for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 02:39 ---
Not to be fixed in GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target
--- Comment #13 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 02:48 ---
Closing as fixed in recent version of GCC.
Not to be fixed in GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #46 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 02:51 ---
Won't fix for 4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Mile
--- Comment #9 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 02:52 ---
Not to be fixed in GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target
--- Comment #20 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 02:54 ---
Won't fix for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
T
--- Comment #12 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 02:55 ---
Won't fix for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
T
--- Comment #21 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 02:56 ---
Fixed in GCC-4.1.x.
Won't fix in GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #6 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 02:57 ---
Won't fix for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Mile
--- Comment #17 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 02:58 ---
Won't fix for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #10 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 03:00 ---
Won't fix for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
T
--- Comment #9 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 03:01 ---
Won't fix for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Mile
--- Comment #16 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 03:03 ---
won't fix for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
T
--- Comment #16 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 03:04 ---
Won't fix for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
T
--- Comment #10 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 03:05 ---
won't fix for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
T
--- Comment #32 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 03:06 ---
No fix will happen for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target
--- Comment #24 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 03:07 ---
No fix for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone
--- Comment #30 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 03:09 ---
Fixed in GCC-4.1.0.
Not to be fixed in GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 03:11 ---
Won't fix for GCC-4.0.x
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18631
--- Comment #13 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 03:13 ---
Fixed in GCC-4.1.0 and later.
Won't fix for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #6 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 03:35 ---
won't fix for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Mile
--- Comment #10 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 03:36 ---
Won't fix for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
T
--- Comment #6 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 03:36 ---
Won't fix for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Mile
--- Comment #7 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 03:37 ---
won't fix for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Mile
--- Comment #3 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 03:38 ---
Won't fix for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Mile
--- Comment #10 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 03:39 ---
Fixed in 4.1.0.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #13 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 03:40 ---
Fixed in 4.1.0.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #19 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 03:41 ---
won't fix for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
T
--- Comment #3 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 03:42 ---
won't fix for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
S
--- Comment #13 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 03:43 ---
Fixed in 4.1.0.
won't fix in 4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #20 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 03:45 ---
Fixed in GCC-4.1.1 and above.
Won't fix in GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #21 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 03:46 ---
won't fix for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
T
--- Comment #10 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 03:46 ---
won't fix for GCC-4.0.x.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
T
--- Comment #20 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 03:52 ---
Fixed in GCC-4.1.0.
Won't fix for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #9 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 03:53 ---
Fixed in GCC-4.1.1
Won't fix for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #11 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 03:54 ---
Fixed in GCC-4.2.0.
Won't fix for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #19 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 04:05 ---
Fixed in GCC-4.1.1 and higher.
Won't fix in GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #18 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 04:05 ---
Fixed in GCC-4.1.1.
Won't fix in GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #7 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 04:06 ---
won't fix for GCC-4.0.x.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
T
--- Comment #10 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 04:07 ---
won't fix in GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
S
--- Comment #5 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 04:08 ---
won't fix for GC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Mile
--- Comment #3 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 04:09 ---
won't fix for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
S
--- Comment #5 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 04:10 ---
Works in GCC-4.1.x and higher.
won't fix in GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #15 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 11:40 ---
Won't fix for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #5 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 11:41 ---
not release critical for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #16 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 11:42 ---
not release critical for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 11:42 ---
not release critical for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 11:43 ---
nnot release critical for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 11:44 ---
Fixed in GCC-4.1.1
not release critcal for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 11:45 ---
fixed in GCC-4.1.0
not release critical for GCC-4.0.x
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
1201 - 1275 of 1275 matches
Mail list logo
