------- Comment #16 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2007-01-17 01:30 ------- Subject: Re: unsigned warning in template
"manu at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | (In reply to comment #14) | > | We don't emit a warning when instantiated as a signed char, so everything | > boils | > | down to having an option to disable the warning, doesn't it? | > | > the logical inference escapes me. | > | | Is having an option to disable the warning the right fix for this PR or is it | not? You made an inference in an earlier message, and I would like to understand it. Because, I do not believe a nobe in form of "hey, you can silence it with with sledge-hammer" is the solution to this particular type of constructs -- note that constants are involved. Care to explain further your earlier message? -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11856
