P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27689
--- Comment #2 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2006-05-20
21:32 ---
But for what F and T would F match foo::bar ?
In looking for workarounds I found that the same problem occurs when using
partial specialization:
template struct S {};
template class T> struc
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41037
igned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31518
MED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33045
Version: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33067
--- Comment #2 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2007-08-14
17:19 ---
I know that, but that's irrelevant from a user interface perspective. The fact
remains that the error message is needlessly messy and would be far clearer and
less surprising to the user if it sai
at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37047
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
GCC host triplet: x86_64-pc-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37119
--- Comment #2 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2008-08-13
21:39 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> so 26bits which is a little over 4 bytes.
I don't follow. 4 bytes is 4*8=32 bits, which is more than 26, no?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37119
--- Comment #9 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2008-08-13
22:24 ---
Ok, I see. Sorry for wasting your time.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37119
--- Comment #1 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2008-08-21
11:35 ---
It seems access control for templates is broken at a more basic level than the
reporter's testcase suggests; witness the following simplified testcase:
class A { typedef int X; };
template s
--- Comment #1 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2008-08-21
11:43 ---
This report is invalid. By 12.3.2,
"A conversion function is never used to convert a
(possibly cv-qualified) object to the (possibly
cv-qualified) same object type (or a reference
--- Comment #2 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2008-08-21
11:53 ---
Most likely related to bug 26693.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36734
--- Comment #1 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2008-08-21
12:00 ---
Still accepted by 4.4. Comeau concurs with reporter, and rejects saying:
line 15: error: class member designated by a
using-declaration must be visible in a direct base class
--
gcc-bugzilla
--- Comment #4 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2008-08-21
12:51 ---
Isolated and reproduced with GCC 4.4 on x86_64:
#include
#include
struct A
{
uint64_t p;
char m_ac[18];
A() { std::cout << "default constructed at " <<
value
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37204
NFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37206
--- Comment #4 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2008-08-23
02:58 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Where is the namespace scope in the example?
>From the standard, 3.3.5p3:
The outermost declarative region of a translation unit is
also a namespace, called the
FIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37875
oduct: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38020
dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35153
atus: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35650
nt_type_p,
at cp/pt.c:15539
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35784
--- Comment #2 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2009-12-22
15:18 ---
Here's a related snippet that should be rejected but isn't:
namespace NS { class x; } int NS::x;
--
gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net changed:
What
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42490
ize does not update capacity
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis
--- Comment #1 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2010-05-18
21:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=20695)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20695&action=view)
Trivial patch that fixes the problem.
The problem was just a missing
--- Comment #3 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2010-05-18
23:38 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I'm going to apply the patch
Great, thanks! :)
> could you please provide name and family name for
> the ChangeLog entry?
It's "Eelis van
--- Comment #6 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2010-06-05
20:12 ---
Looks fixed in 4.4.1.
--
gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2007-10-31
00:44 ---
Then perhaps I ought to explain what I'm using -Wfatal-errors for.
I wrote an IRC bot called geordi ( http://www.eelis.net/geordi ) that accepts
lines of C++ code, compiles them with g++, and e
--- Comment #7 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2007-11-13
18:42 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> The bug is that the C++ front end implicitly #defines _GNU_SOURCE.
> [..]
> Could some libstdc++ guru explain why this define is actually needed?
I am no libst
terizes function as being
overloaded
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla
sion: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34524
--- Comment #2 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2007-12-18
20:16 ---
My apologies.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34524
--- Comment #7 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2008-04-13
21:19 ---
Still fails on GCC 4.4.0 20080413 (experimental).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5786
P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35966
rence type not rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http
nvalid function type.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/b
ry: -fno-exceptions breaks simple if-statement.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36655
--- Comment #4 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2008-06-29
12:53 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Fixed for 4.4.0.
Thanks! However, I just noticed that while the problem has been fixed for
function templates, it's still there for class templates. This code:
--- Comment #5 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2008-06-29
12:54 ---
Crap, pasted the wrong code. Here's the code that now triggers the warning:
template class S {};
extern template class S;
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36655
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36744
--- Comment #1 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2008-07-06
14:48 ---
Forgot to mention: compile with -std=c++0x.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36744
gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36760
ings
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36778
tedBy: gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36943
50 matches
Mail list logo
