[Bug fortran/38852] New: UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets

2 0 0 -- Summary: UBOUND fails for negative stride triplets Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu

[Bug fortran/38859] New: ubound and lbound treat structure component references as whole arrays

dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38859

[Bug fortran/38863] New: WHERE with multiple elemental defined assignments gives wrong answer

NFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38863

[Bug fortran/38883] New: Internal Compiler Error for MVBITS with derived type argument that has run-time subscripts

ion: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38883

[Bug fortran/38887] New: run-time abort for MVBITS with run-time zero sized array arguments

with run-time zero sized array arguments Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: di

[Bug fortran/38907] New: ICE when contained function has same name as module function and used in expression

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38907

[Bug fortran/38863] WHERE with multiple elemental defined assignments gives wrong answer

--- Comment #2 from dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com 2009-01-18 21:37 --- Subject: Re: WHERE with multiple elemental defined assignments gives wrong answer On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 2:40 PM, mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > --- Comment #1 from mikael at gc

[Bug fortran/38914] New: ICE with array inquiry functions above contains in parameter expression

CONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38914

[Bug fortran/38915] New: wrong results for structure assignment of character components when left and right sides overlap

lts for structure assignment of character components when left and right sides overlap Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at g

[Bug fortran/38917] New: Can't use DATA to initialize pointer to array to NULL()

to NULL() Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/

[Bug fortran/38918] New: compile time error for DATA of NULL() to pointer structure component

MED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38918

[Bug fortran/38863] WHERE with multiple elemental defined assignments gives wrong answer

--- Comment #4 from dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com 2009-01-19 22:31 --- Subject: Re: WHERE with multiple elemental defined assignments gives wrong answer On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:18 PM, mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > --- Comment #3 from mikael at gc

[Bug fortran/34805] defined assignment not allowed to vector subscripted array

--- Comment #6 from dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com 2008-08-12 18:27 --- Subject: Re: defined assignment not allowed to vector subscripted array On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 3:39 PM, jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- Comment #5 from j

[Bug fortran/37723] New: wrong result for left-right hand side array overlap and (possibly) negative strides

ht hand side array overlap and (possibly) negative strides Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug fortran/37787] New: right-left hand side overlap not recognized with EQUIVALENCEd array assignment

EQUIVALENCEd array assignment Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com

[Bug fortran/35681] wrong result for vector subscripted array expression in MVBITS

--- Comment #11 from dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com 2008-10-18 17:02 --- Subject: Re: wrong result for vector subscripted array expression in MVBITS Also, MVBITS is a special case. See the top of page 215 in the F95 standard. The FROM and TO arguments are allowed to be the

[Bug fortran/34861] New: ICE in function with entry (and result?)

mmary: ICE in function with entry (and result?) Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendricks

[Bug fortran/34875] New: read into vector-valued section doesn't transfer any values

dif END -- Summary: read into vector-valued section doesn't transfer any values Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34875

[Bug fortran/34876] New: can't read zero length array sections

ENDIF end -- Summary: can't read zero length array sections Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot g

[Bug fortran/34861] ICE in function with entry (and result?)

--- Comment #4 from dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com 2008-01-20 01:21 --- Subject: Re: ICE in function with entry (and result?) Sorry, basically a typo on my part. This is part of a large test suite and I cut it down to a small case. The "variable" NF3 has the value

[Bug fortran/34945] New: LBOUND fails for array with KIND(complex) used in zero-sized dimension

: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34945

[Bug fortran/34784] [4.2/4.3 Regression] implicit character(s) hides type of selected_int_kind intrinsic

--- Comment #8 from dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com 2008-01-23 18:31 --- Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3 Regression] implicit character(s) hides type of selected_int_kind intrinsic I have another example of what might be the same problem, although the symptoms are a little different

[Bug fortran/35681] New: wrong result for vector subscripted array expression in MVBITS

Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35681

[Bug fortran/35682] New: assignment to run-time zero-sized complex section stores a value

unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35682

[Bug fortran/35682] assignment to run-time zero-sized complex section stores a value

--- Comment #1 from dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com 2008-03-24 20:35 --- Some similar assignment statements that work correctly ZCA(NF1:NF10:MF1) = ZDA(NF1:NF10:MF1) XCA(NF10:NF5:NF2) = XDA(NF4:NF9:MF2) where the NF* variables have the value * and the MF* variables

[Bug fortran/35685] New: UBOUND incorrect for run-time zero-sized section

Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35685

[Bug fortran/35698] New: lbound and ubound wrong for allocated run-time zero size array

array Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35698

[Bug fortran/35699] New: run-time abort writing zero sized section to direct access file

Summary: run-time abort writing zero sized section to direct access file Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35699

[Bug fortran/35699] run-time abort writing zero sized section to direct access file

--- Comment #1 from dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com 2008-03-25 21:49 --- I have another essentially identical subroutine that uses double complex instead of character and appears to fail in the same way. I also have three other subroutines that write/read zero sized arrays and

[Bug fortran/35702] New: internal compiler error: structure character element with subscripts

er element with subscripts Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot

[Bug fortran/35718] New: deallocating non-allocated pointer target does not fail

cc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35718

[Bug fortran/35719] New: pointer to zero sized array not associated

3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35719

[Bug fortran/35721] New: ASSOCIATED returns false when strides confusing

SSOCIATED returns false when strides confusing Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson

[Bug fortran/35723] New: Can't use run-time array element in character declaration

ummary: Can't use run-time array element in character declaration Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug fortran/35724] New: Compile time segmentation fault for CSHIFT with negative third arg

Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s

[Bug fortran/35721] ASSOCIATED returns false when strides confusing

--- Comment #2 from dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com 2008-03-28 00:57 --- Subject: Re: ASSOCIATED returns false when strides confusing On 27 Mar 2008 18:27:44 -, burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- Comment #1 from burnus at

[Bug fortran/35681] wrong result for vector subscripted array expression in MVBITS

--- Comment #3 from dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com 2008-03-28 15:48 --- Subject: Re: wrong result for vector subscripted array expression in MVBITS Right, in case you haven't found it yet, the first paragraph of 12.7.3, page 214, says effectively that all of the arguments

[Bug fortran/35743] New: allocate negative memory for zero-sized WHERE construct

Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35743

[Bug fortran/35745] New: Divide incorrectly extracted from WHERE block?; run time abort

ignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35745

[Bug fortran/35756] New: incorrect WHERE for functions in ELSEWHERE and overlaps

Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35756

[Bug fortran/35759] New: WHERE with overlap with ELSEWHERE error

ONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35759

[Bug fortran/35769] New: inappropriate FORALL error

everity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35769

[Bug fortran/35770] New: implicit character(s) hides type of internal function

hides type of internal function Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail do

[Bug fortran/35779] New: error pointer wrong in PARAMETER

ion: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35779

[Bug fortran/35780] New: internal compiler error for complicated PARAMETER expressions

ity: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35780

[Bug fortran/35819] New: internal compiler error with forall

: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35819

[Bug fortran/35820] New: internal compiler error with forall

t org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35820

[Bug fortran/35819] internal compiler error with forall

--- Comment #1 from dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com 2008-04-03 18:37 --- Obviously, ignore this one. I must have hit "enter" by mistake -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35819

[Bug fortran/35820] internal compiler error with forall

--- Comment #2 from dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com 2008-04-03 22:12 --- Subject: Re: internal compiler error with forall On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 3:30 PM, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot e

[Bug fortran/34759] New: Assumed size array reference not allowed in SHAPE intrinsic, even though last subscript specified

cified Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34759

[Bug fortran/34760] New: PRIVATE variable not allowed as STAT variable in ALLOCATE

Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug fortran/34763] New: bare END not allowed in an interface block in a module procedure

procedure Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://

[Bug fortran/34784] New: implicit character(s) hides type of selected_int_kind intrinsic

of selected_int_kind intrinsic Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hend

[Bug fortran/34785] New: internal compiler error for array constructor for sequence type

Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34785

[Bug fortran/34784] implicit character(s) hides type of selected_int_kind intrinsic

--- Comment #1 from dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com 2008-01-15 20:49 --- Another example in executable code MODULE s_TESTS IMPLICIT CHARACTER (P) CONTAINS subroutine simple (u,j1) optional :: j1 if (present (j1)) stop end subroutine

[Bug fortran/34805] New: defined assignment not allowed to vector subscripted array

Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34805

[Bug fortran/34805] defined assignment not allowed to vector subscripted array

--- Comment #3 from dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com 2008-01-16 20:07 --- Subject: Re: defined assignment not allowed to vector subscripted array Why not put this one on hold for a while. I'll check some more. There never was a formal interpretation request. It's k

[Bug fortran/35932] New: internal compiler error: CHAR with array arg and also a KIND arg

KIND arg Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.or

[Bug fortran/35940] New: Array BACK ignored in INDEX intrinsic when other args scalar

Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35940

[Bug fortran/35940] Array BACK ignored in INDEX intrinsic when other args scalar

--- Comment #1 from dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com 2008-04-14 21:49 --- I forgot to include the output C:\gfortran>gfortran fa1031.f C:\gfortran>a T F T F T F T F T F 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 -- dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com c

[Bug fortran/35944] New: wrong result for MOD with kind=10 for some array argument values

argument values Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://

[Bug fortran/35946] New: wrong result with array constructor as argument to ATAN2

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35946

[Bug fortran/35947] New: wrong answers with array constructor argument to IEOR

ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35947

[Bug fortran/35960] New: run time abort with assignment of RESHAPEd zero sized array

array Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35960

[Bug fortran/35988] New: run-time abort for MATMUL of run-time zero sized array

omponent: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35988

[Bug fortran/35990] New: run-time abort for MATMUL of run-time zero sized array

time zero sized array Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35990

[Bug fortran/35991] New: run-time abort for CSHIFT of zero sized array

Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35991

[Bug fortran/35993] New: wrong answer for PRODUCT with scalar mask

mponent: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35993

[Bug fortran/35994] New: MAXLOC and MINLOC off by one with mask

roduct: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.

[Bug fortran/35995] New: ANY, ALL, and COUNT errors for zero sized sections

ned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35995