------- Comment #4 from dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com 2008-01-20 01:21 ------- Subject: Re: ICE in function with entry (and result?)
Sorry, basically a typo on my part. This is part of a large test suite and I cut it down to a small case. The "variable" NF3 has the value 3 and the value is set in a way that the compiler shouldn't be able to use the value in any optimizations. You can either replace the NF3 by 3, add NF3 to the argument list, or put the function in a module and declare NF3 above the contains. I try to run these small examples through another compiler as a check on my typing skills. This one clearly slipped by without the check. I hope it didn't cause too much trouble. Dick Hendrickson On 19 Jan 2008 18:42:13 -0000, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ------- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-01-19 18:42 > ------- > Is really "SIZE(IDA2,NF3)" done on purpose? or is this a typo for > "SIZE(IDA2,3)"? It does not change the ICE AFAICT. > > > > -- > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34861 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34861