ct: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: david at rothlis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43943
--- Comment #3 from david at rothlis dot net 2010-04-30 06:05 ---
> a function with a missing return is valid
I just can't reconcile that with the following line from the C++ standard: "It
is now invalid to return (explicitly or implicitly) from a function which is
declare
--- Comment #6 from david at rothlis dot net 2010-04-30 14:01 ---
OK, thanks for the explanation!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43943
