------- Comment #3 from david at rothlis dot net 2010-04-30 06:05 ------- > a function with a missing return is valid
I just can't reconcile that with the following line from the C++ standard: "It is now invalid to return (explicitly or implicitly) from a function which is declared to return a value without actually returning a value." Any insights? Thanks for the "-Werror=return-type" tip. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43943
