[Bug c++/43790] New: In lambda express, calling member function of non-captured class gives internal compiler error

, calling member function of non- captured class gives internal compiler error Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: darlingm at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43790

[Bug c++/43792] New: In lambda express, calling member function of non-captured class gives internal compiler error

, calling member function of non- captured class gives internal compiler error Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: darlingm at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43792

[Bug c++/43792] In lambda express, calling member function of non-captured class gives internal compiler error

--- Comment #1 from darlingm at gmail dot com 2010-04-19 07:23 --- (bad refresh) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 43790 *** -- darlingm at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/43790] In lambda express, calling member function of non-captured class gives internal compiler error

--- Comment #1 from darlingm at gmail dot com 2010-04-19 07:23 --- *** Bug 43792 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43790

[Bug c++/43790] [C++0x] In lambda express, calling member function of non-captured class gives internal compiler error

--- Comment #6 from darlingm at gmail dot com 2010-04-28 21:27 --- Looks good, thanks! No more internal compiler error, and now nicely says "error: '' is not captured", where is of course the name of the uncaptured variable. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugz

[Bug c/65999] New: c11 compliance - fopen_s not supported

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: darlingm at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Microsoft implemented fopen_s some time ago. According to http://en.cppreference.com/w/c/io/fopen, it was made part of the C11 standard. (Forgive me if they're wrong.) GCC v

[Bug c/66000] New: Suggestion: more than one "not declared in this scope" per line

nhancement Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: darlingm at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- With the code nonExistantClass varName = nonExistantFunction(); gcc 5.1.0 gives error: `nonExistantClass' was

[Bug c++/66231] New: -Werror=zero-as-null-pointer-constant - errors on -isystem function default values of NULL

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: darlingm at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- I'm using -Werror=zero-as-null-pointer-constant. I'm using a library with a header providing default

[Bug other/66259] New: Combined gcc and binutils build from git-master fails, with gas/as-new not existing

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: darlingm at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Posted this first at binutils. Alan Modra said "Not a binutils bug." and closed it, at https://sourceware.or

[Bug other/66259] Combined gcc and binutils build from git-master fails, with gas/as-new not existing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66259 --- Comment #1 from Michael Darling --- BTW, this happens on stage 2. Uncombined build works just fine... If I: mkdir binutils.build.gcc492 cd binutils.build.gcc492 ../gcc.binutils.combined/binutils-gdb.git/configure --disable-multilib && make

[Bug other/66259] Combined gcc and binutils build from git-master fails, with gas/as-new not existing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66259 --- Comment #4 from Michael Darling --- symlinking binutils source first, and overwriting symlinks with gcc source did not help - same error. Have to run out for a bit, but I almost have this narrowed down to the exact commit that caused this.

[Bug other/66259] Combined gcc and binutils build from git-master fails, with gas/as-new not existing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66259 --- Comment #5 from Michael Darling --- The commit that broke combined builds is: binutils # 35eafcc71b8a54330704656fb6df0b5d6665ed15 Fri Jul 4 12:59:42 2014 +0930 | Rename configure.in to configure.ac (HEAD) If I run binutils # 35eafcc combin