[Bug target/117645] [15 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr29581-2.c execution test with late-combine

2024-11-20 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117645 --- Comment #5 from John David Anglin --- Problem goes away if I add support for small integers to addti3 (and subti3).

[Bug rtl-optimization/117770] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr37922.C -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test

2024-11-28 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117770 --- Comment #5 from John David Anglin --- I'm working on trying to split the code after reload.

[Bug target/117627] [15 Regression] build failure targeting hppa64-linux / hppa64-elf, pa/linux-atomic.c contains invalid C23 (trying typedef bool)

2024-11-16 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117627 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin --- bool is not used in the file and I think the typedef line can be removed.

[Bug target/117645] [15 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr29581-2.c execution test with late-combine

2024-11-18 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117645 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin --- I tried the following to disable late_combine2: diff --git a/gcc/config/pa/pa.cc b/gcc/config/pa/pa.cc index 941ef3a7128..4dfc7da0f2f 100644 --- a/gcc/config/pa/pa.cc +++ b/gcc/config/pa/pa.cc @@ -586,6

[Bug target/117525] [15 Regression] canvas.cc:1675:1: internal compiler error: in expand_fix, at optabs.cc:5952 since r15-2890

2024-11-20 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117525 --- Comment #17 from John David Anglin --- Should we reopen and change component?

[Bug target/117645] [15 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr29581-2.c execution test with late-combine

2024-11-20 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117645 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 59653 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59653&action=edit Prelinary patch to split TImode addti3 Still doesn't work. After reload we have: (code_label 163 15 160

[Bug target/117645] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr29581-2.c execution test

2024-11-17 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 59615 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59615&action=edit Reload RTL dump With LRA, we have the following test failure on

[Bug target/117645] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr29581-2.c execution test

2024-11-17 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117645 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 59616 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59616&action=edit late_combine2 RTL dump

[Bug tree-optimization/112358] [14/15 Regression] glibc -Wstringop-overflow= build failure on hppa since r14-4089-gd45ddc2c04e471

2024-11-23 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112358 --- Comment #14 from John David Anglin --- The warning is bogus. Theoretically, current_used + count can wrap around to zero without undefined behaviour. But as noted by Florian, these are counts of link maps (among other things). Link maps h

[Bug target/117564] a-comp.c:649:1: internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.cc:102

2024-11-15 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117564 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug rtl-optimization/117645] [15 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr29581-2.c execution test with late-combine

2024-11-25 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117645 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |rtl-optimization See Also

[Bug rtl-optimization/117770] New: FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr37922.C -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test

2024-11-25 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 59698 --> ht

[Bug target/117248] gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.h:232:25: internal compiler error: Arithmetic exception

2024-11-30 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117248 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Build|hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa64-hp-hpux11.11

[Bug target/117248] gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.h:232:25: internal compiler error: Arithmetic exception

2024-12-01 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117248 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug rtl-optimization/117248] gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.h:232:25: internal compiler error: Arithmetic exception

2024-12-01 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117248 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |rtl-optimization --- Comment #7 fro

[Bug rtl-optimization/117248] gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.h:232:25: internal compiler error: Arithmetic exception

2024-12-01 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117248 --- Comment #8 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 59760 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59760&action=edit Preprocessed source.

[Bug rtl-optimization/117248] gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.h:232:25: internal compiler error: Arithmetic exception

2024-12-01 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117248 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug rtl-optimization/117248] gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.h:232:25: internal compiler error: Arithmetic exception

2024-12-04 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117248 --- Comment #11 from John David Anglin --- LRA is not yet enabled by default on hppa. To enable, use "-mlra" option or hack pa.opt to enable by default: mlra Target Var(pa_lra_p) Init(1) Use LRA instead of reload (transitional). On linux, the

[Bug rtl-optimization/117770] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr37922.C -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test

2024-12-03 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117770 --- Comment #8 from John David Anglin --- The change breaks bootstrap. See PR 117248. When the instructions to setup the argument registers for millicode calls are split out before reload, they sometimes are deleted. This affects SImode modsi

[Bug rtl-optimization/117248] gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.h:232:25: internal compiler error: Arithmetic exception

2024-12-05 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117248 --- Comment #14 from John David Anglin --- That would be awesome!

[Bug rtl-optimization/117248] gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.h:232:25: internal compiler error: Arithmetic exception

2024-12-08 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117248 --- Comment #17 from John David Anglin --- The original problem on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 is fixed. The related problem on linux reported in comments 5 and 6 is also fixed. Only the testsuite fail reported in comment 16 remains.

[Bug rtl-optimization/117951] FAIL: 20_util/variant/run.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)

2024-12-08 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117951 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin --- Similar fails: FAIL: std/ranges/cartesian_product/1.cc -std=gnu++23 (test for excess errors) FAIL: std/ranges/cartesian_product/1.cc -std=gnu++26 (test for excess errors)

[Bug rtl-optimization/117951] FAIL: 20_util/variant/run.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)

2024-12-09 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117951 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug rtl-optimization/117951] FAIL: 20_util/variant/run.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)

2024-12-07 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117951 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 59816 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59816&action=edit Reload RTL dump for function std::_UninitDestroyGuard

[Bug rtl-optimization/117951] New: FAIL: 20_util/variant/run.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)

2024-12-07 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 59815 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59815&action=edit Preprocessed

[Bug rtl-optimization/117248] gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.h:232:25: internal compiler error: Arithmetic exception

2024-12-07 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117248 --- Comment #16 from John David Anglin --- Things are improved but a similar error occurs in the second umod:SI call in /testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/arith-rand-ll.c: (insn 339 337 341 31 (parallel [ (set (reg:SI 29 %r29)

[Bug rtl-optimization/117951] FAIL: 20_util/variant/run.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)

2024-12-24 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117951 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin --- run.cc compiles okay if I add -fno-gcse to compile command. dave@mx3210:~/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/testsuite$ cat xxx.sh /home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/xg++ -shared-libgcc -B/home/dav

[Bug rtl-optimization/117951] FAIL: 20_util/variant/run.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)

2024-12-28 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117951 --- Comment #5 from John David Anglin --- Jeff removed himself from CC list, so I presume he thinks this is not a gcse bug.

[Bug middle-end/118050] [15 Regression] timevar.cc:163:18: error: 'CLOCK_MONOTONIC' was not declared in this scope

2024-12-26 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118050 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/111709] [13/14/15 Regression] Miscompilation of sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/s_fma.c since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c50

2025-02-03 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111709 --- Comment #20 from John David Anglin --- Will investigate further but it's not the testcase but glibc's fma/fmal that is miscompiled.

[Bug rtl-optimization/117248] gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.h:232:25: internal compiler error: Arithmetic exception

2025-02-04 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117248 --- Comment #28 from John David Anglin --- Problem worked around on hppa by commit https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=88bb18ccd87d43abe401a1228cc337e4b46be88d.

[Bug target/111709] [13/14/15 Regression] Miscompilation of sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/s_fma.c since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c50

2025-02-05 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111709 --- Comment #22 from John David Anglin --- Actually, it appears the multiplication by 0.25 can be avoided by setting w directly.

[Bug target/111709] [13/14/15 Regression] Miscompilation of sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/s_fma.c since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c50

2025-02-05 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111709 --- Comment #26 from John David Anglin --- (In reply to Joseph S. Myers from comment #23) > hppa is an after-rounding architecture and this test is only meant to > produce underflow on before-rounding architectures. You should investigate > why

[Bug c++/70349] FAIL: g++.dg/abi/abi-tag18a.C -std=gnu++98 scan-assembler _ZZ1fB7__test1vEN1T1gB7__test2Ev

2025-02-09 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70349 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 60436 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60436&action=edit 64-bit assembler output

[Bug c++/111075] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE on g++.dg/torture/tail-padding1.C on darwin since r13-6145-gb2287a4d9a640fdc2caef6a067830ea65044deb7

2025-02-10 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111075 --- Comment #8 from John David Anglin --- trivial_fn_p (fun) returns true.

[Bug c++/111075] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE on g++.dg/torture/tail-padding1.C on darwin since r13-6145-gb2287a4d9a640fdc2caef6a067830ea65044deb7

2025-02-10 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111075 --- Comment #9 from John David Anglin --- (gdb) p debug_tree (fun) > DI size unit-size align:64 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set -1 canonical-type 83ffbfed0bd0 method basetype arg-types

[Bug c++/70349] FAIL: g++.dg/abi/abi-tag18a.C -std=gnu++98 scan-assembler _ZZ1fB7__test1vEN1T1gB7__test2Ev

2025-02-05 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70349 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin --- On hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 at revision r15-7342-gd3627c78be1, we have the following new fails: FAIL: g++.dg/abi/abi-tag18a.C -std=gnu++17 scan-assembler _ZZZ1fB7__test1vEN1T1gEvE1x FAIL: g++.dg/abi/abi-tag

[Bug target/111709] [13/14/15 Regression] Miscompilation of sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/s_fma.c since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c50

2025-02-05 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111709 --- Comment #21 from John David Anglin --- For the testcase in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111709#c16, the underflow bit is generated in this glibc code in s_fma.c: /* v.ieee.mantissa1 & 2 is LSB bit of the result bef

[Bug target/111709] [13/14/15 Regression] Miscompilation of sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/s_fma.c since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c50

2025-02-05 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111709 --- Comment #25 from John David Anglin --- The unions in this code have been completely optimized away making this code very difficult to debug. I worry that there is a disconnect between the floating and integer values in the unions. Float co

[Bug testsuite/118762] New: FAIL: g++.dg/modules/pr98893_b.C -std=c++2b scan-assembler __tcf_ZL1b:

2025-02-05 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org CC: nshead at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir64/gcc/testsuite/g++2/../../xg

[Bug target/111709] [13/14/15 Regression] Miscompilation of sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/s_fma.c since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c50

2025-02-06 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111709 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #60399|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/111709] [13/14/15 Regression] Miscompilation of sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/s_fma.c since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c50

2025-02-06 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111709 --- Comment #28 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 60399 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60399&action=edit Patch Fixes fma testcases on hppa. This is a glibc bug.

[Bug target/111709] [13/14/15 Regression] Miscompilation of sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/s_fma.c since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c50

2025-02-06 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111709 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |MOVED Status|WAITING

[Bug c++/111075] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE on g++.dg/torture/tail-padding1.C on darwin since r13-6145-gb2287a4d9a640fdc2caef6a067830ea65044deb7

2025-02-10 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111075 --- Comment #10 from John David Anglin --- Another bit of information: Breakpoint 5, type_has_trivial_fn (ctype=0x83ffbfeb1f18, sfk=sfk_copy_constructor) at ../../gcc/gcc/cp/method.cc:399 399 switch (sfk) (gdb) p debug_tree (ctype

[Bug rtl-optimization/117248] gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.h:232:25: internal compiler error: Arithmetic exception

2024-12-10 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117248 --- Comment #20 from John David Anglin --- It appears I again forgot to add -mlra to the compile command. The problem is clear in the generated assembly code: extrs %r5,31,16,%r26 extrs %r24,31,16,%r7 copy %r7,%r25

[Bug rtl-optimization/117248] gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.h:232:25: internal compiler error: Arithmetic exception

2024-12-10 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117248 --- Comment #21 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 59829 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59829&action=edit Reload RTL dump

[Bug rtl-optimization/117248] gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.h:232:25: internal compiler error: Arithmetic exception

2024-12-10 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117248 --- Comment #19 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 59828 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59828&action=edit Preprocessed source for arith-rand-ll.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/117248] gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.h:232:25: internal compiler error: Arithmetic exception

2024-12-10 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117248 --- Comment #22 from John David Anglin --- Oh, the $$remI millicode call implements mod:SI in the RTL.

[Bug target/118018] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/nestfunc-5.c -O1 execution test

2024-12-15 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118018 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/118050] New: [15 Regression] timevar.cc:163:18: error: 'CLOCK_MONOTONIC' was not declared in this scope

2024-12-15 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
NCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 Target: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 Build:

[Bug lto/118121] New: [15 Regression] lto-wrapper.cc:1878:20: error: 'mkstemps' was not declared in this scope

2024-12-18 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
NCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 Target: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 Build:

[Bug lto/118121] [15 Regression] lto-wrapper.cc:1878:20: error: 'mkstemps' was not declared in this scope

2024-12-18 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118121 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 59913 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59913&action=edit Patch Fixes compile error. Declaration for mkstemps was more or less placed randomly in libiberty.h.

[Bug rtl-optimization/118018] New: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/nestfunc-5.c -O1 execution test

2024-12-12 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 59850 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59850&action=edit Preprocessed source.

[Bug tree-optimization/118025] gcc.dg/field-merge-9.c FAILs

2024-12-14 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Target|sparc*-sun-solaris2.11, |sparc*-sun-solaris2.11, |powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu |powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu |, pru-unknown-elf, |, pru

[Bug target/118018] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/nestfunc-5.c -O1 execution test

2024-12-13 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118018 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Target||hppa*-*-linux* Build|

[Bug target/117627] [15 Regression] build failure targeting hppa64-linux / hppa64-elf, pa/linux-atomic.c contains invalid C23 (trying typedef bool)

2024-11-17 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117627 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/118417] New: Bootstrap comparison failure! gcc/range-op.o differs

2025-01-11 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- At commit a7ae0c31245a7db7abf2e80d0016510afe9c8ad0, we have a bootstrap comparison on 32-bit hppa-unknown-linux-gnu. Comparing stages 2 and 3 Bootstrap comparison

[Bug middle-end/118417] [15 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure! gcc/range-op.o differs

2025-01-12 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118417 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin --- We have the following new fails on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11: +FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c -O1 execution test +FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c -O2 execution test +FAIL: gcc.c-tortur

[Bug middle-end/118417] [15 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure! gcc/range-op.o differs

2025-01-12 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118417 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin --- The ifcombine change fixed build.

[Bug rtl-optimization/117248] gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.h:232:25: internal compiler error: Arithmetic exception

2025-01-24 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117248 --- Comment #26 from John David Anglin --- We have the following fails in the libgomp testsuite with lra: FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/lastprivate-conditional-3.c execution test WARNING: libgomp.c++/doacross-1.C execution test prog

[Bug c++/116524] FAIL: g++.dg/modules/permissive-error-1.C -std=c++17 (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault)

2025-01-27 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116524 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/116524] FAIL: g++.dg/modules/permissive-error-1.C -std=c++17 (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault)

2025-01-04 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116524 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug middle-end/118050] [15 Regression] timevar.cc:163:18: error: 'CLOCK_MONOTONIC' was not declared in this scope

2024-12-24 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118050 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin --- Will do.

[Bug tree-optimization/118186] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/field-merge-16.c scan-tree-dump-times ifcombine "optimizing" 6

2024-12-23 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: hppa*-*-linux* Target: hppa*-*-linux* Build: hpp

[Bug rtl-optimization/117248] gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.h:232:25: internal compiler error: Arithmetic exception

2024-12-23 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117248 --- Comment #25 from John David Anglin --- The problem noted in comment 20 is still present on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu. Compile command: /home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/cc1 -fpreprocessed ./arith-rand-ll.i -quiet -da - dumpdir ./ -dumpbase arith-

[Bug rtl-optimization/117770] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr37922.C -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test

2024-12-23 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117770 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/118121] [15 Regression] lto-wrapper.cc:1878:20: error: 'mkstemps' was not declared in this scope

2024-12-29 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118121 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/118238] [15 Regression] gcc/lto-wrapper.cc uses link which is not recommend and does not exist on mingw

2024-12-29 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118238 Bug 118238 depends on bug 118121, which changed state. Bug 118121 Summary: [15 Regression] lto-wrapper.cc:1878:20: error: 'mkstemps' was not declared in this scope https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118121 What|Removed

[Bug c++/116524] FAIL: g++.dg/modules/permissive-error-1.C -std=c++17 (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault)

2025-01-16 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116524 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin --- Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-January/673831.html

[Bug testsuite/116986] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr115387-2.c -O0 (test for excess errors)

2025-02-18 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116986 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/119089] New: FAIL: 23_containers/vector/debug/assign4_backtrace_neg.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)

2025-03-02 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/xg++ -shared-libgcc -B/home /dave

[Bug libstdc++/119089] FAIL: 23_containers/vector/debug/assign4_backtrace_neg.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)

2025-03-02 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119089 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin --- Maybe introduced by the following change: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=ad2908ed4ec5eff3cad3fd142cde5c1fac4788e9

[Bug libstdc++/119089] FAIL: 23_containers/vector/debug/assign4_backtrace_neg.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)

2025-03-02 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119089 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin --- Don't know. It's defined in generic code. All the initializers seem to have an extra set of `{}`.

[Bug libstdc++/119089] FAIL: 23_containers/vector/debug/assign4_backtrace_neg.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)

2025-03-02 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119089 --- Comment #8 from John David Anglin --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5) > Isn't this a glibc change, and you need to regenerate the gcc fixincludes > headers after updating glibc? That could have happened. Will investigate. Th

[Bug libstdc++/119089] FAIL: 23_containers/vector/debug/assign4_backtrace_neg.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)

2025-03-03 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119089 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/119089] FAIL: 23_containers/vector/debug/assign4_backtrace_neg.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)

2025-03-04 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119089 --- Comment #13 from John David Anglin --- Debian doesn't ship fixed pthread.h but they are in my personal builds. I will probably remove fixed pthread.h from my personal builds.

[Bug debug/119220] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2.c scan-assembler-times DW_AT_entry_pc 6

2025-03-11 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 Target: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 Build: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11

[Bug rtl-optimization/117645] [15 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr29581-2.c execution test with late-combine

2025-03-13 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117645 --- Comment #9 from John David Anglin --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8) >> > The current implementation of addti3 on hppa only allows register > > operands. The problem is avoided if we improve addti3 to support > > the addition o

[Bug testsuite/119220] [15 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2.c scan-assembler-times DW_AT_entry_pc 6

2025-03-13 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119220 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 60748 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60748&action=edit Patch Your suggestion works.

[Bug libstdc++/119089] FAIL: 23_containers/vector/debug/assign4_backtrace_neg.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)

2025-03-03 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119089 --- Comment #9 from John David Anglin --- The PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER initializer changed in glibc 2.41. In addition to regenerating the gcc fixincludes, I believe gcc needs rebuilding as the initializer is used in gthr.h. Debian doesn't ship

[Bug rtl-optimization/119362] tree-object-size.cc:1377:1: error: unrecognizable insn

2025-03-23 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119362 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 60856 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60856&action=edit ira-costs.cc patch to fix build on PA 1.x The hunk of code disabled in the attached patch was added in com

[Bug rtl-optimization/119362] [15 regression] tree-object-size.cc:1377:1: error: unrecognizable insn

2025-03-24 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119362 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug rtl-optimization/119362] New: tree-object-size.cc:1377:1: error: unrecognizable insn

2025-03-18 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org CC: vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: hppa*-*-linux* Target: hppa*-*-linux* Build: hppa*-*-linux

[Bug rtl-optimization/119362] [15 regression] tree-object-size.cc:1377:1: error: unrecognizable insn

2025-03-26 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119362 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin --- Build fixed by https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=6c443e128802bd93158a3db7c4edf5fc1fc76c8d. What bothers me is the above change was to fix a performance regression caused by a more aggressiv

[Bug ada/119698] New: gen_il-main: raised PROGRAM_ERROR : finalize/adjust raised exception

2025-04-09 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
Priority: P3 Component: ada Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org CC: dkm at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: hppa*-*-linux* Target: hppa*-*-linux* Build

[Bug libgomp/119570] New: FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/metadirective-4.c execution test

2025-04-01 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgomp Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 Target

[Bug other/119569] New: FAIL: c-c++-common/gomp/append-args-1.c (internal compiler error: in modify_call_for_omp_dispatch, at gimplify.cc:3957)

2025-04-01 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 Target

[Bug testsuite/119220] [15 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2.c scan-assembler-times DW_AT_entry_pc 6

2025-03-17 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119220 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug testsuite/118762] FAIL: g++.dg/modules/pr98893_b.C -std=c++2b scan-assembler __tcf_ZL1b:

2025-03-31 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118762 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 60931 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60931&action=edit Assembler output Looks like check should be xfailed on 64-bit hppa-hpux.

[Bug rtl-optimization/119538] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr117938.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test

2025-03-29 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: hppa64-hp

[Bug libstdc++/119840] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb73.C -std=gnu++26 (test for excess errors)

2025-04-16 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119840 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin --- I'm also seeing warnings from this file in build log. Probably, this warning was introduced in the following commit: 473dde525248a694c0f4e62b31a7fc24b238c5b0

[Bug target/19799] sibcall-3.c and sibcall-4.c xfailed on hppa64-*-hpux*

2025-04-19 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19799 --- Comment #10 from John David Anglin --- Yup: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2025-April/844452.html

[Bug libstdc++/119840] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb73.C -std=gnu++26 (test for excess errors)

2025-04-18 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119840 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug ada/119698] gen_il-main: raised PROGRAM_ERROR : finalize/adjust raised exception

2025-04-30 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119698 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin --- gcc-12 can no longer build itself: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-12&arch=hppa&ver=12.4.0-6&stamp=1746020966&raw=0

[Bug libstdc++/119840] New: FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb73.C -std=gnu++26 (test for excess errors)

2025-04-16 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 Target: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 Build: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11

[Bug testsuite/120085] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/modref-2 c_lto_modref-2_0.o-c_lto_modref-2_0.o link, -O2 -flto-partition=max -flto -fno-ipa-sra

2025-05-05 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120085 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug ada/119698] gen_il-main: raised PROGRAM_ERROR : finalize/adjust raised exception

2025-05-02 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119698 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c/120066] New: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr51694.c -O0 (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault)

2025-05-02 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir64/gcc/xgcc -B/home/dave/gnu/gcc/o bjdir64/gcc/ -fdiagnostics

[Bug gcov-profile/120086] FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-29.c

2025-05-04 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120086 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin --- (In reply to Jørgen Kvalsvik from comment #2) > Interesting. I looked at the attach'd .gcov file and it is filled with these: > > paths covered 1 of zu > > Does the target not support size_t with print

[Bug gcov-profile/120086] FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-29.c

2025-05-04 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120086 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin --- Guess this is a problem in other files: bash-5.1$ grep zu *.cc crc-verification.cc:fprintf (dump_file, "Checking %zu bit.\n", it_end); crc-verification.cc:fprintf (dump_file, "Checking %zu bit.\

<    18   19   20   21   22   23   24   >